Hey Nancy, Feel Like Going To Jail? Support For 9/11-Style Investigation of 6 Jan Event Growing

[bodecea]

Support growing for 9-11 style commission to investigate January 6 riot

Be careful what you wish for

hotair.com

The FBI warned Pelosi the 6 Jan violence was pre-planned and was coming...Pelosi let it happen to falsely use against Trump.

Removal from the House is the least she should face....but we all know her terrorist traitor co-conspiring Dems will protect her ass....

Support growing for 9-11 style commission to investigate January 6 riot

Be careful what you wish for

hotair.com

Why did the GOP stonewall any kind of investigation?

 

[Moonglow]

The FBI warned Pelosi the 6 Jan violence was pre-planned and was coming...Pelosi let it happen to falsely use against Trump.

Removal from the House is the least she should face....but we all know her terrorist traitor co-conspiring Dems will protect her ass....

I'm sorry, where was Pelosi in the chain of command here, exactly?

Let's not forget, it was Republicans who shut down a bi-partisan investigation of 1/6.

Probably because they didn't want anyone asking who gave the rioters floor plans to the Capitol.

She was in charge of ordering the support of the
National Guards and she purposely refused them against recommendations.

Show us the memo that put her in charge of the Army National guard, you know the units that the commander in chief is in charge of along with the Secretary of the Army? If she refused recommendations why did not Mitch McConnel order them since he was the head of capitol police in the Senate? Where was the president during this fiasco, the terlit? Was he deaf, blind and dumb to the situation while he doddled?

 

[bodecea]

Support growing for 9-11 style commission to investigate January 6 riot

Be careful what you wish for

hotair.com

The FBI warned Pelosi the 6 Jan violence was pre-planned and was coming...Pelosi let it happen to falsely use against Trump.

Removal from the House is the least she should face....but we all know her terrorist traitor co-conspiring Dems will protect her ass....

Support growing for 9-11 style commission to investigate January 6 riot

Be careful what you wish for

hotair.com

Well, let's hope it isn't a 9-11 style investigation, but rather one that arrives at the truth.

Sadly...(and I know this thread is months old)...the Republicans are afraid to have any kind of investigation.

 

[bodecea]

The FBI warned Pelosi the 6 Jan violence was pre-planned and was coming...Pelosi let it happen to falsely use against Trump.

Removal from the House is the least she should face....but we all know her terrorist traitor co-conspiring Dems will protect her ass....

I'm sorry, where was Pelosi in the chain of command here, exactly?

Let's not forget, it was Republicans who shut down a bi-partisan investigation of 1/6.

Probably because they didn't want anyone asking who gave the rioters floor plans to the Capitol.

For some reason they think Pelosi is in command of all security at the Capital..

It's the latest talking point.....just as wrong as most other trump cultist talking points.

 

[jc456]

m sorry, where was Pelosi in the chain of command here, exactly

In charge of the insurrection! I thought by now you’d have figured it out

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Imaginary actions? Hahaha dude, you’re defending the indefensible

I’m defending reality. Trump supporters are fighting for a shared delusion.

Leftism is a shared delusion.

 

[HaShev]

It

The FBI warned Pelosi the 6 Jan violence was pre-planned and was coming...Pelosi let it happen to falsely use against Trump.

Removal from the House is the least she should face....but we all know her terrorist traitor co-conspiring Dems will protect her ass....

I'm sorry, where was Pelosi in the chain of command here, exactly?

Let's not forget, it was Republicans who shut down a bi-partisan investigation of 1/6.

Probably because they didn't want anyone asking who gave the rioters floor plans to the Capitol.

She was in charge of ordering the support of the
National Guards and she purposely refused them against recommendations.

Show us the memo that put her in charge of the Army National guard, you know the units that the commander in chief is in charge of along with the Secretary of the Army? If she refused recommendations why did not Mitch McConnel order them since he was the head of capitol police in the Senate? Where was the president during this fiasco, the terlit? Was he deaf, blind and dumb to the situation while he doddled?

It's the job of the house majority leader and you can look it up. If you want to dispute if she did it on purpose or was playing the devils advocate to everything Trump would do, then that's your subjective opinion and right in doing so, but you can not argue over the fact it is soley her Job and she messed up bad, made a bad call and is deflecting and weaponizing her own failed actions. Now if you were to conclude she did it on purpose, what would that make her in your eyes? Can you be honest and answer that?

 

[jc456]

Imaginary actions? Hahaha dude, you’re defending the indefensible

I’m defending reality. Trump supporters are fighting for a shared delusion.

I’m defending Americans

 

[colfax_m]

Imaginary actions? Hahaha dude, you’re defending the indefensible

I’m defending reality. Trump supporters are fighting for a shared delusion.

I’m defending Americans

Who are you defending from what exactly?

 

[JoeB131]

It's the job of the house majority leader and you can look it up. If you want to dispute if she did it on purpose or was playing the devils advocate to everything Trump would do, then that's your subjective opinion and right in doing so, but you can not argue over the fact it is soley her Job and she messed up bad, made a bad call and is deflecting and weaponizing her own failed actions. Now if you were to conclude she did it on purpose, what would that make her in your eyes? Can you be honest and answer that?

Or maybe she had a reasonable expectation that a president wouldn't stoop so low as to incite a riot because he couldn't admit he lost an election.

The only person who messed up is Trump in ignoring 250 years of history of respecting peaceful transfers of power.

 

[HaShev]

It's the job of the house majority leader and you can look it up. If you want to dispute if she did it on purpose or was playing the devils advocate to everything Trump would do, then that's your subjective opinion and right in doing so, but you can not argue over the fact it is soley her Job and she messed up bad, made a bad call and is deflecting and weaponizing her own failed actions. Now if you were to conclude she did it on purpose, what would that make her in your eyes? Can you be honest and answer that?

Or maybe she had a reasonable expectation that a president wouldn't stoop so low as to incite a riot because he couldn't admit he lost an election.

The only person who messed up is Trump in ignoring 250 years of history of respecting peaceful transfers of power.

There's a problem with what you said, because inciting non violent protest (Most protestors) by calling for peaceful protest is selectively ignored by you and the media avoids the word peaceful on purpose, because it goes against the false narrative to call blame to the then President Trump as inciteful.
And the lefts and medias incitement to violence and lockdown policies that enrage the mixed political and anti political crowd, thus incite, is magically removed from your conversation. Then there is an issue of other protests elsewhere that by your standard is incited by Waters, Pelosi, media etc. That don't get your same wrath, making you phoney in concern and inconsistant with what is incitement and what is people doing what they want even after you say the word peaceful.
Lastly the issue you bring forward is problematic because you are saying certain people have no rights to protest and others do, even though what you permit is more likely to be non peaceful then those you want to violate their rights on.-oops. That's called fascism.

 

[JoeB131]

There's a problem with what you said, because inciting non violent protest (Most protestors) by calling for peaceful protest is selectively ignored by you and the media avoids the word peaceful on purpose, because it goes against the false narrative to call blame to the then President Trump as inciteful.
And the lefts and medias incitement to violence and lockdown policies that enrage the mixed political and anti political crowd, thus incite, is magically removed from your conversation. Then there is an issue of other protests elsewhere that by your standard is incited by Waters, Pelosi, media etc. That don't get your same wrath, making you phoney in concern and inconsistant with what is incitement and what is people doing what they want even after you say the word peaceful.
Lastly the issue you bring forward is problematic because you are saying certain people have no rights to protest and others do, even though what you permit is more likely to be non peaceful then those you want to violate their rights on.-oops. That's called fascism.

Uh, guy, they have every right to protest.

They don't have a right to storm government buildings and disrupt government proceedings and threaten elected officials.

As for the BLM riots, this country had more than a decade to fix police brutality. We didn't. Instead, we ignored the issue, we destroyed the careers of people who protested it like Colin Kapernaek. The sad thing is, White people only do the right thing when you threaten to break their stuff.

Now, yes, I do think the TRUMP RIOTS (TM) last year were a lot worse than they should have been because TRUMP PLAGUE (TM) and TRUMP RECESSION(TM) caused a higher level of anxiety.

 

[HaShev]

There's a problem with what you said, because inciting non violent protest (Most protestors) by calling for peaceful protest is selectively ignored by you and the media avoids the word peaceful on purpose, because it goes against the false narrative to call blame to the then President Trump as inciteful.
And the lefts and medias incitement to violence and lockdown policies that enrage the mixed political and anti political crowd, thus incite, is magically removed from your conversation. Then there is an issue of other protests elsewhere that by your standard is incited by Waters, Pelosi, media etc. That don't get your same wrath, making you phoney in concern and inconsistant with what is incitement and what is people doing what they want even after you say the word peaceful.
Lastly the issue you bring forward is problematic because you are saying certain people have no rights to protest and others do, even though what you permit is more likely to be non peaceful then those you want to violate their rights on.-oops. That's called fascism.

Uh, guy, they have every right to protest.

They don't have a right to storm government buildings and disrupt government proceedings and threaten elected officials.

As for the BLM riots, this country had more than a decade to fix police brutality. We didn't. Instead, we ignored the issue, we destroyed the careers of people who protested it like Colin Kapernaek. The sad thing is, White people only do the right thing when you threaten to break their stuff.

Now, yes, I do think the TRUMP RIOTS (TM) last year were a lot worse than they should have been because TRUMP PLAGUE (TM) and TRUMP RECESSION(TM) caused a higher level of anxiety.

True they (the few)have no right to break a window and storm in depending on how and position in doing so is debatable, since it happens all the time in protest of congress and the same exact energy and punishment should be applied to them as was applied to people who storm in and disrupt congress for all kinds of activist statements like womans rights, and whatever those other outbursts were numerous times. Those who violated the law were given charges of disorderly conduct like probably those protestors from years ago were given, but calling it Trump incitement or insurrection or armed riots is dissingenous and once again you can't defend Maxine Waters incitement nor the lefts incited violent riots, so you deflect and smokescreen and take the argument away that you are accusing your own party of things through the lens of 1 event that had a good proportion Trump followers. One which is falsely claimed about elections when just as many people were there protesting the lockdowns and other issues they had with congress.

 

[JoeB131]

True they (the few)have no right to break a window and storm in depending on how and position in doing so is debatable, since it happens all the time in protest of congress and the same exact energy and punishment should be applied to them as was applied to people who storm in and disrupt congress for all kinds of activist statements like womans rights, and whatever those other outbursts were numerous times. Those who violated the law were given charges of disorderly conduct like probably those protestors from years ago were given, but calling it Trump incitement or insurrection or armed riots is dissingenous

Actually, I can call it exactly that... Trump invited tens of thousands of people to this rally and got them riled up. This is a lot worse than a few Feminists complaining about a federal judge. It's kind of the threat level.

I've never seen Congressmen run and hide from the scary feminists...

once again you can't defend Maxine Waters incitement nor the lefts incited violent riots,

Maxine Waters isn't president, and those people were going to riot no matter what she said. Geo. Floyd was the straw that broke the camel's back.

so you deflect and smokescreen and take the argument away that you are accusing your own party of things through the lens of 1 event that had a good proportion Trump followers. One which is falsely claimed about elections when just as many people were there protesting the lockdowns and other issues they had with congress.

You're babbling. The 1/6 Riots were about elections. Trump invited hoardes of crazy people to Washington and set them loose on Congress. If Trump had accepted his loss in November and wished Biden well, we wouldn't have an issue here.

 

[HaShev]

True they (the few)have no right to break a window and storm in depending on how and position in doing so is debatable, since it happens all the time in protest of congress and the same exact energy and punishment should be applied to them as was applied to people who storm in and disrupt congress for all kinds of activist statements like womans rights, and whatever those other outbursts were numerous times. Those who violated the law were given charges of disorderly conduct like probably those protestors from years ago were given, but calling it Trump incitement or insurrection or armed riots is dissingenous

Actually, I can call it exactly that... Trump invited tens of thousands of people to this rally and got them riled up. This is a lot worse than a few Feminists complaining about a federal judge. It's kind of the threat level.

I've never seen Congressmen run and hide from the scary feminists...

once again you can't defend Maxine Waters incitement nor the lefts incited violent riots,

Maxine Waters isn't president, and those people were going to riot no matter what she said. Geo. Floyd was the straw that broke the camel's back.

so you deflect and smokescreen and take the argument away that you are accusing your own party of things through the lens of 1 event that had a good proportion Trump followers. One which is falsely claimed about elections when just as many people were there protesting the lockdowns and other issues they had with congress.

You're babbling. The 1/6 Riots were about elections. Trump invited hoardes of crazy people to Washington and set them loose on Congress. If Trump had accepted his loss in November and wished Biden well, we wouldn't have an issue here.

So not only do you want to control people's right to assemble and protest, now you claim to want to control rallies of your opposition. Which they also did under the guise of covid, so you can't deny your fascist leanings.-Busted!

 

[JoeB131]

So not only do you want to control people's right to assemble and protest, now you claim to want to control rallies of your opposition. Which they also did under the guise of covid, so you can't deny your fascist leanings.-Busted!

You're babbling now, buddy.

Here's the ugly truth of 1-6. The Republican party didn't have the balls to stand up to Trump and tell him to knock it off.

They got a big old black eye when the crazies he incited stormed the Capitol.

 

[HaShev]

So not only do you want to control people's right to assemble and protest, now you claim to want to control rallies of your opposition. Which they also did under the guise of covid, so you can't deny your fascist leanings.-Busted!

You're babbling now, buddy.

Here's the ugly truth of 1-6. The Republican party didn't have the balls to stand up to Trump and tell him to knock it off.

They got a big old black eye when the crazies he incited stormed the Capitol.

In what sane society is it ok to accept the harrassment of Judge Kavanaugh with a phoney false charge of rape just so your party can stop an appointment that you merely assume would more likely side against than may not side against your pro abortion stance?
In what sane society is it ok to accept fake scandal ploys against Judge Roy Moore running for AL Senate, so you can steal a seat in the Senate?
In what sane society is it ok to railroad your own Senator Al Franken simply because he refused to take MSM Comcast(msnbc) and Time Warner (CNN) money to overlook the monopolization of a Merger, and squelched that attempt?

In what sane society do you inadvertantly call yourselves insane without even seeing it, because you are that deflective?
Did you ever lock up in an insane assylum, that banana suit guy in Seattle C.h.a.z.? If not, then you proved my point.

 

[JoeB131]

In what sane society is it ok to accept the harrassment of Judge Kavanaugh with a phoney false charge of rape just so your party can stop an appointment that you merely assume would more likely side against than may not side against your pro abortion stance?

In what sane world do you put a drunken rapist with anger control issues in a lifetime appointment where he can decide women's issues?

Yea fathead their ancestors were the ones doing the raping. Don’t you get it moron?

In what sane society is it ok to accept fake scandal ploys against Judge Roy Moore running for AL Senate, so you can steal a seat in the Senate?

Except Moore's creepy behavior was documented. The real problem you guys have is that you keep nominating people like him and Trump and call yourselves "The Party of Family Values".

In what sane society is it ok to railroad your own Senator Al Franken simply because he refused to take MSM Comcast(msnbc) and Time Warner (CNN) money to overlook the monopolization of a Merger, and squelched that attempt?

Except Comcast and Time Warner didn't merge their flailing Cable Businesses. The real problem is, Cable is a dying industry. It's being replaced by streaming. As for Franken himself, he let himself get railroaded, and frankly, the Democrats kind of brought this on themselves with the Pound Me Too movement.

In what sane society do you inadvertantly call yourselves insane without even seeing it, because you are that deflective?
Did you ever lock up in an insane assylum, that banana suit guy in Seattle C.h.a.z.? If not, then you proved my point.

Who?

Uh, this is your guy... storming the capitol.

 

[HaShev]

In what sane society is it ok to accept the harrassment of Judge Kavanaugh with a phoney false charge of rape just so your party can stop an appointment that you merely assume would more likely side against than may not side against your pro abortion stance?

In what sane world do you put a drunken rapist with anger control issues in a lifetime appointment where he can decide women's issues?

View attachment 503874

Yea fathead their ancestors were the ones doing the raping. Don’t you get it moron?

In what sane society is it ok to accept fake scandal ploys against Judge Roy Moore running for AL Senate, so you can steal a seat in the Senate?

Except Moore's creepy behavior was documented. The real problem you guys have is that you keep nominating people like him and Trump and call yourselves "The Party of Family Values".

In what sane society is it ok to railroad your own Senator Al Franken simply because he refused to take MSM Comcast(msnbc) and Time Warner (CNN) money to overlook the monopolization of a Merger, and squelched that attempt?

Except Comcast and Time Warner didn't merge their flailing Cable Businesses. The real problem is, Cable is a dying industry. It's being replaced by streaming. As for Franken himself, he let himself get railroaded, and frankly, the Democrats kind of brought this on themselves with the Pound Me Too movement.

In what sane society do you inadvertantly call yourselves insane without even seeing it, because you are that deflective?
Did you ever lock up in an insane assylum, that banana suit guy in Seattle C.h.a.z.? If not, then you proved my point.

Who?

Uh, this is your guy... storming the capitol.

View attachment 503877

Thank you for showing us your political stance has made you insane or at least your news source helped make you that way long before your progressive cities lockdowns.
You have to be insane to think bannana suit man is cooler and less criminal then buffalo soldier.-case closed! ;-)

 

[mamooth]

It
It's the job of the house majority leader and you can look it up.

"You can look it up" is the Trump cult code phrase for "I'm just making crap up."

Pelosi did not reject appeals for troops to secure US Capitol

Facebook posts claim that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused six pleas from the sergeant at arms for National Guard troops to be deployed at the US Capitol, the scene of deadly violence on January 6, 2021. This is false; the petitions came from a different security official, the House sergeant...

factcheck.afp.com

CNN's Facts First searchable database - CNN

Search CNN’s Facts First database for fact checks related to the U.S. economy, mail-in voting, coronavirus, police reform and more.

www.cnn.com

https://www.fresnobee.com/news/california/article249315725.html

There’s no proof for Trump claim that Pelosi denied troops

Asked in an interview about the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, former President Donald Trump claimed that he had mad

www.politifact.com