Herman CAIN vs President UnABLE

[Truthmatters]

I would vote for Obama.

I think he is Very qualified also and I like his postions for the solutions to our problems better than the republicans stance.

Please list his qualifications.

His education

His temperment.

His experience.

His law work.

His work with people at the grass roots level.

His ideas

 

[Ernie S.]

I thank for the apology.

It was owed.
If followed, it would keep everyone from votingNo, it will keep ineligible voters from voting. Eligible voters need only present a photo ID that can be had at little or no cost

One you care about the other you dont.

WHY?????

I care about both. In one case, a Democrat Governor would like to suspend the rights of everyone to vote for Congress, and in the other, Conservatives would like to assure that only those legally entitled to vote, do so.
So, do I find one case more reprehensible than the other?
You betcha!

But the facts dont agree with you

Negged for stupidity!
Now THAT is funny! What you meant to say is the facts are irrelevant. I'm voting for obama and I don't really care that Cain is vastly better qualified.

 

[Truthmatters]

There is next to NONE of the type of fraud this law claims to prevent happening in this country.

Bush admin study of five years concluded that.

There are studies that show it keeps people from voting.

It costs millions to achieve.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Herman Cain is a very bright man and an able businessman.

I like that now the right will have to recognize that Morehouse college produces great men.

I do not however agree with Cains proposals for the country.

I am loving the prospect of two educated and bright balck men running for president of this nation.

IT WOULD BE AWESOME!


lets do it guys.

It would be pretty to have cain to vote for. I would actually look forward to voting.....i mean i'll vote romney and all but I would much rather vote cain.

 

[Ernie S.]

I would vote for Obama.

I think he is Very qualified also and I like his postions for the solutions to our problems better than the republicans stance.

Please list his qualifications.

His education

His temperment.

His experience.

His law work.

His work with people at the grass roots level.

His ideas

His education is suspect seeing we have no transcripts.
His temperament is elitist and condescending.
His experience is sadly lacking. What he has gained as POTUS, should alone disqualify him.
His law work has been mundane and barely significant.
His work at the grass roots level has been racially motivated.
His ideas are socialistic and anti-American.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Dennis Miller -- I'm pretty sure the real Dennis Miller went to sleep one night and that pod in his basement took over. He's just not that same guy on a rant that used to crack me up on HBO.

He actually is, you just used to not know his political leanings.

 

[Si modo]

There is next to NONE of the type of fraud this law claims to prevent happening in this country.

Bush admin study of five years concluded that.

There are studies that show it keeps people from voting.

It costs millions to achieve.

No, there are NOT studies that indicate that.

Lair [sic]

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Herman Cain: "Stupid People Are Ruining America" - YouTube

there may be some truth to that.. you know, in thinking back:

Pointing to a conservative woman and a progressive republican dolt doesn't dimish the truth in that video of cain.

Sorry Jillian, you need to do better than that with me.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Lets try to remember this thread is about Herman Cain and his vast resume.

he is VERY qualified for the postion he seeks

yes he is.

Please tell me what he has that say....Mitt Romeny doesnt have.

A conservative core set of values that I haven't seen compromised, on record.

 

[Jarhead]

Lets try to remember this thread is about Herman Cain and his vast resume.

he is VERY qualified for the postion he seeks

yes he is.

Please tell me what he has that say....Mitt Romeny doesnt have.

A conservative core set of values that I haven't seen compromised, on record.

True...but that would be a turn off to TM....I am trying to see her justify her claim that her feeling he is the best qualified candidate is not based on the color of his skin.

 

[Seawytch]

Tell me why you think he is crazy Seawytch ?

Start with his views on the separation of church and state and just go from there.

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

 

[Si modo]

Start with his views on the separation of church and state and just go from there.

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

If he had said the block is OK when a community doesn't like a religion, you might have a point.

He didn't, and you don't.

Judge upholds ruling for Murfreesboro mosque | The Tennessean | tennessean.com

 

[Samson]

Start with his views on the separation of church and state and just go from there.

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

A position that differs from the constitution!!!!!

O.M.G.

Has that ever happened before?


idiot.

 

[Jarhead]

Start with his views on the separation of church and state and just go from there.

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

you know...I have heard some far left pundits claim he had said that but I have yet to find any evidence of it.
DO you have a link of some kind?
For if he did say it, then he just dropped out of consideration my me.....and by no means of any less imporatnace, I would owe you a sincere apology.

 

[Nosmo King]

Someone who has little or no political experience (therefore he does not firmly grasp the ways of D.C. and how legislation gets through congress) and he can deliver a good speech.

Am I talking about the 2008 Barack Obama or the 2011 Herman Cain?

 

[Si modo]

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

you know...I have heard some far left pundits claim he had said that but I have yet to find any evidence of it.
DO you have a link of some kind?
For if he did say it, then he just dropped out of consideration my me.....and by no means of any less imporatnace, I would owe you a sincere apology.

I myself checked on that because it doesn't sit well with me, either.

So, I looked at what he said and I looked at the community's argument in the suit (link posted above).

I agree with him.

 

[Rocko]

Oh....I see. If someone sees something differently than you..well...then they must be crazy.

Well...lets see....You are a lesbian....I do not see you as crazy even though I am not gay.....but since I do not have a preference of same sex attraction, you must think I am crazy to be a heterosexual.

Interesting.....and you complain when people discriminate against the gay community?

You ma'am, are a hypocrite.

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

you know...I have heard some far left pundits claim he had said that but I have yet to find any evidence of it.
DO you have a link of some kind?
For if he did say it, then he just dropped out of consideration my me.....and by no means of any less imporatnace, I would owe you a sincere apology.

I don't agree with Cain on this, but I can appreciate his point of view.

Herman Cain Says U.S. Communities 'Have The Right' To Ban Mosques | Fox News



He retracted after though.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/07/27/politics/main20084560.shtml

 

[Jarhead]

His position differs from the constitution. Saying a community should be able to block the building of a place of worship if they don't like the religion is ******* crazy, period. Zero hypocrisy involved.

you know...I have heard some far left pundits claim he had said that but I have yet to find any evidence of it.
DO you have a link of some kind?
For if he did say it, then he just dropped out of consideration my me.....and by no means of any less imporatnace, I would owe you a sincere apology.

I myself checked on that because it doesn't sit well with me, either.

So, I looked at what he said and I looked at the community's argument in the suit (link posted above).

I agree with him.

Yes....I agree with what he said...but I do not agree with what the left is claiming he meant.

But seeing as he did not mean what the left claims he meant, and that is quite obvious, ........Cain has not lost my consideration

He is not interested in banning the building of Mosques.

He is interested in preserving American Laws on American soil...and maintianing the separation of Church and State.

Pretty much as constitutional as you can get.

For anyone to spin what he meant...and many are doing it...is a sign of them fearing him as a candidate against Obama.

 

[Si modo]

you know...I have heard some far left pundits claim he had said that but I have yet to find any evidence of it.
DO you have a link of some kind?
For if he did say it, then he just dropped out of consideration my me.....and by no means of any less imporatnace, I would owe you a sincere apology.

I myself checked on that because it doesn't sit well with me, either.

So, I looked at what he said and I looked at the community's argument in the suit (link posted above).

I agree with him.

Yes....I agree with what he said...but I do not agree with what the left is claiming he meant.

But seeing as he did not mean what the left claims he meant, and that is quite obvious, ........Cain has not lost my consideration

He is not interested in banning the building of Mosques.

He is interested in preserving American Laws on American soil...and maintianing the separation of Church and State.

Pretty much as constitutional as you can get.

For anyone to spin what he meant...and many are doing it...is a sign of them fearing him as a candidate against Obama.

Exactly.

This is also exactly why I verify pretty much anything that is said here.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Someone who has little or no political experience (therefore he does not firmly grasp the ways of D.C. and how legislation gets through congress) and he can deliver a good speech.

Am I talking about the 2008 Barack Obama or the 2011 Herman Cain?

Your description sounds more like Cain than Obama.

In 2008 Obama had a TON of political experience and could deliver a good speech
In 2011 Cain Has little political experience and can deliver a decent speech.


However, in 2008 Obama had ZERO executive experience (AKA the president being the head of the executive branch) while in 2011 Cain has A TON of it.