Here's Kamala Harris clearly explaining that she's Communist

[Moonglow]

If Jesus was a Communist he would have said so. He didn't.

He told people to give money to the poor. He never said the government should steal everything from everyone and make everyone poor.

He didn't want to give it away that he knew about Karl Marx.

 

[Blackrook]

He didn't want to give it away that he knew about Karl Marx.

He made it clear to Pontius Pilate that his Kingdom was not of Earth, but of heaven. That means he took no stand against the Roman Empire and he takes no stand in modern politics.

 

[Moonglow]

If Jesus was a Communist he would have said so. He didn't.

He told people to give money to the poor. He never said the government should steal everything from everyone and make everyone poor.

The whole concept is this; The planet belongs to God and everything taken from the planet is God's and should be shared...

According to Psalm 24:1-2 in the Bible, God claims the earth and everything in it, including the world and all people, because he founded it on the seas and built it on the ocean depths. The verse states that God is the owner of all creation, including human beings

 

[Moonglow]

He made it clear to Pontius Pilate that his Kingdom was not of Earth, but of heaven. That means he took no stand against the Roman Empire and he takes no stand in modern politics.

That was when he was alive when he died he changed positions.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

 

[Flopper]

I'm curious, does anyone here like how California is run, which is why a major replacement of the population is taking place? Reason I ask is, currently that's where the Democrat's most powerful politicians are from, and they have an eye on your State next. Communist Kamala wants you.

Here's Kamala clearly explaining that she is Communist. Read 45 declarations of communist takeover BTW, written in 1963, and adopted by the Democrats.

Children's Literature-bibliographies

Anytime someone starts writing about communism, I know they are iving in the 20th century. Russia is not even communist today. Although the Chinese Communist Party maintains the illusion that the economy is based on communist socialism, the fact is the country runs on capitalism. They just refuse to admit it.

 

[dudmuck]

If Jesus was a Communist he would have said so. He didn't.

He told people to give money to the poor. He never said the government should steal everything from everyone and make everyone poor.

 

[elektra]

I am sitting and you should watch what you call God.

Why

 

[elektra]

it was only two fish, and five loaves of bread. Jesus used the power of god to multiply them to feed at least five thousand people. They were given to the people. Not sold for profit.

Labor is capitalism. Capitalism is taught by God.

 

[Moonglow]

Labor is capitalism. Capitalism is taught by God.

So that's what the Garden of Eden was all about

 

[Flopper]

Jesus Christ and his Dad said the same thing, those darn communists.

I'm curious, does anyone here like how California is run, which is why a major replacement of the population is taking place? Reason I ask is, currently that's where the Democrat's most powerful politicians are from, and they have an eye on your State next. Communist Kamala wants you.

Here's Kamala clearly explaining that she is Communist. Read 45 declarations of communist takeover BTW, written in 1963, and adopted by the Democrats.

Children's Literature-bibliographies

California began to shrink in 2020 due to pandemic deaths, federal immigration restrictions and declining birth rates. It was the first time the state lost population since it began recording the numbers in 1900. California's population increased in 2023 by just over 67,000 to 39,128,162 people, according to the data. That's an annual growth rate of 0.17%.

The rush out of California has been greatly exaggerated for political reasons. I lived in California in the good old days over 50 years ago. Although it was not exactly a land of milk and honey, it was a great place to live. Unfortunately, the word got around causing huge population growth and today the state has big problems resulting in high cost of living and some of the highest taxes in the country. Yet the population is still growing, and most people think it is good place to live. Thankfully, the population growth is not as fast as it has been in the past.

 

[Flopper]

Well then, most the of the US govt must be Communist, as no matter who is in power, they seem to be giving money to someone for nothing.

Except Communism isn't about giving money away. Communism wants a world without money. Duh.

Your post illustrates quite well the misunderstanding of what communist actually is. It is certainly not about government giving money away.

Classic Communism is a political theory derived from Karl Marx theory in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. It was a nice idea, but impossible to implement.

There was Communism under Stalin, also know as Stalinism in which Stalin ruled the country with an iron fist. The government controlled or owned almost everything. Farmers and factory workers were provide with food and shelter and little else. Most of the economic production in the country went to supporting a huge military and a system of controlling the lives of workers which required a huge government bureaucracy. There was very little consumer goods produced and most it went to top Party members.

Lastly, there was Communism after Stalin. After Stalin's death there were leaders such as Khrushchev who tried to implement classic communism emphasizing economic production with less control over the lives of the people. He believe he could incentivize workers with propaganda, praising workers for higher production, offering better goverment housing and various perks etc. However, offering monetary incentives or private ownership was unthinkable. Thus Khrushchev's 3 year plans and 5 years plans, all failed measurably. After Khrushchev, hardliners gain control of the government believing that Russia's future depending on outdoing the West militarily. That lead to worse economic failures and finally the breakup of the Soviet Union and the ending of communism in Russia.

Today, the Communist Party is no longer in control of the government and communism has been rejected by most of the people. Russia's economic system now is a mix of a planned economy and a market economy, which some say is a distinct system with its own rules. Although the economy is producing more goods and services for people than every before, real economic freedom is being smothered by the oligarchs and criminal syndicates.

Real Communist as proposed by Marx and Lenin was never really successfully implement in Russia because it does not provide the incentive needed for economic growth. People work for personal economic gain, not for the good others, at least not in this life.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Your post illustrates quite well the misunderstanding of what communist actually is. It is certainly not about government giving money away.

Classic Communism is a political theory derived from Karl Marx theory in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. It was a nice idea, but impossible to implement.

There was Communism under Stalin, also know as Stalinism in which Stalin ruled the country with an iron fist. The government controlled or owned almost everything. Farmers and factory workers were provide with food and shelter and little else. Most of the economic production in the country went to supporting a huge military and a system of controlling the lives of workers which required a huge government bureaucracy. There was very little consumer goods produced and most it went to top Party members.

Lastly, there was Communism after Stalin. After Stalin's death there were leaders such as Khrushchev who tried to implement classic communism emphasizing economic production with less control over the lives of the people. He believe he could incentivize workers with propaganda, praising workers for higher production, offering better goverment housing and various perks etc. However, offering monetary incentives or private ownership was unthinkable. Thus Khrushchev's 3 year plans and 5 years plans, all failed measurably. After Khrushchev, hardliners gain control of the government believing that Russia's future depending on outdoing the West militarily. That lead to worse economic failures and finally the breakup of the Soviet Union and the ending of communism in Russia.

Today, the Communist Party is no longer in control of the government and communism has been rejected by most of the people. Russia's economic system now is a mix of a planned economy and a market economy, which some say is a distinct system with its own rules. Although the economy is producing more goods and services for people than every before, real economic freedom is being smothered by the oligarchs and criminal syndicates.

Real Communist as proposed by Marx and Lenin was never really successfully implement in Russia because it does not provide the incentive needed for economic growth. People work for personal economic gain, not for the good others, at least not in this life.

Yeah, in the US a lot of people see Communism merely as "the enemy".

They don't understand what Communism is.

Also, it's hard to define a Communist country. It is said that a Communist country is one that is Communist or working towards Communism. However it's not very clear if the USSR was even working towards Communism at all. One aspect of Communism is the lack of strong leadership at the top. All people are equal, more or less, and decisions are taken by the commune, not by a powerful leader like Stalin.

 

[elektra]

So that's what the Garden of Eden was all about

What else could it he about

 

[Flopper]

Yeah, in the US a lot of people see Communism merely as "the enemy".

They don't understand what Communism is.

Also, it's hard to define a Communist country. It is said that a Communist country is one that is Communist or working towards Communism. However it's not very clear if the USSR was even working towards Communism at all. One aspect of Communism is the lack of strong leadership at the top. All people are equal, more or less, and decisions are taken by the commune, not by a powerful leader like Stalin.

I agree. There are no real communist countries only those that claim to be and very few of those exist.

North Korea is a totalitarian state ruled by a ruthless dictator. The Supreme People's Assembly is the legislature of North Korea. It is ostensibly the highest organ of state power but in reality it is totally controlled by the party and thus it's leader, Kim Jong Un. Most of everything in country is underdeveloped. Just about everyone works for government in one way or another. Public officials live off bribery. Wealth flows to the top and very little flows down to the people that created it. Any resemblance to Marx's view of socialism and life in North Korea would be purely coincidental.

In China, the Communist Party leadership holds ultimate authority and directly controls economic activity. However, the 362,000 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and their subsidiaries, are less than 3% of the 32.8 million corporate enterprises in the country. Very few of these corporate enterprises are run by the communist party but the party or it's members do have nonworking interest that provides the goverment enormous revenues. The management is both Chinese and foreign. The unwritten rule of business in China is you stay out of government business and the government will stay out of your business. A singe derogatory statement directed at the government will almost surely result in fast and severe actions such as cancellation of licenses, government contracts, increased export taxes, etc.

In America calling a person or organization communist is a derogatory statement generally targeting a liberal or someone believed to be. In the mid 20th century it was considered to be the ultimate political insult. Today it just identifies the user as being of that era.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Kamala need to keep her panties on straight.....

 

[Blackrook]

I agree. There are no real communist countries only those that claim to be and very few of those exist.

North Korea is a totalitarian state ruled by a ruthless dictator. The Supreme People's Assembly is the legislature of North Korea. It is ostensibly the highest organ of state power but in reality it is totally controlled by the party and thus it's leader, Kim Jong Un. Most of everything in country is underdeveloped. Just about everyone works for government in one way or another. Public officials live off bribery. Wealth flows to the top and very little flows down to the people that created it. Any resemblance to Marx's view of socialism and life in North Korea would be purely coincidental.

In China, the Communist Party leadership holds ultimate authority and directly controls economic activity. However, the 362,000 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and their subsidiaries, are less than 3% of the 32.8 million corporate enterprises in the country. Very few of these corporate enterprises are run by the communist party but the party or it's members do have nonworking interest that provides the goverment enormous revenues. The management is both Chinese and foreign. The unwritten rule of business in China is you stay out of government business and the government will stay out of your business. A singe derogatory statement directed at the government will almost surely result in fast and severe actions such as cancellation of licenses, government contracts, increased export taxes, etc.

In America calling a person or organization communist is a derogatory statement generally targeting a liberal or someone believed to be. In the mid 20th century it was considered to be the ultimate political insult. Today it just identifies the user as being of that era.

Stalin killed milllions.

Mao killed millions.

Pol Pot killed millions.

Castro turned his country into an island prison. He outlawed Christmas.

North Korea is a primitive state that doesn't even have electricity for most of its people. The people starve.

The Communists say, "But none of those regimes were TRUE COMMUNISM. Communism hasn't actually ever been tried."

 

[Flopper]

Stalin killed milllions.

Mao killed millions.

Pol Pot killed millions.

Castro turned his country into an island prison. He outlawed Christmas.

North Korea is a primitive state that doesn't even have electricity for most of its people. The people starve.

The Communists say, "But none of those regimes were TRUE COMMUNISM. Communism hasn't actually ever been tried."

I have always thought of true communism as having a religious significance. The idea that people will work for the of good all, putting the state above there own needs and desires is just not of this world.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Stalin killed milllions.

Mao killed millions.

Pol Pot killed millions.

Castro turned his country into an island prison. He outlawed Christmas.

North Korea is a primitive state that doesn't even have electricity for most of its people. The people starve.

The Communists say, "But none of those regimes were TRUE COMMUNISM. Communism hasn't actually ever been tried."

Just because you don't understand it.....