Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud

Of course. Everything that contradicts my political allegiance is fake news.

I forgot.
Not worth talking about. The traitor Obama has done his damage and is most likely behind the now systematic destruction of this country that you heartily approve of. Anything else? Maybe something on topic?
 
Not worth talking about. The traitor Obama has done his damage and is most likely behind the now systematic destruction of this country that you heartily approve of. Anything else? Maybe something on topic?
Lizard people?
 
It is not a quest. You are a useless troll.
il_1588xN.4137570393_jxij.jpg
 
Democrats doing everything they can to steal elections.

And the corrupt DoJ has and will ignore this.

Bill Barr, you've had so much to say what say you now?


Database latency -- a geeky term, but that’s how they did it!
A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store -- so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine -- except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database -- the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file -- months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new, and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games -- exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot gathering scammers know about latency -- it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business -- and they are great at it!
They know the Republicans have hundreds of diligent election sleuths working in basements and dining room tables checking voter rolls for the dead and the fakes.
They know those people rely on NCOA and Melissa and other highly latent services as their baseline. If someone moved, it shows up in NCOA -- two months later.
A real voter moved. They want to keep getting their St. Jude’s donation cards. They fill in their NCOA form to get mail forwarded to their new address. Our fraud detectives find this person -- and maybe someone voted for them. Cross out one phantom!
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
    • Count the in-person votes on election day.
    • Count the early, in-person votes.
    • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County everything).
    • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes, then changed them back.
    • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
    • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.


...


Read the rest here.


View attachment 732925
You are making the erroneous assumption that voter registrar offices can create programs to make mass changes in the voter database. Elections system are locked down; that is workers can only make specific types of changes with proper documentation which form an audit trail.
1. To Change the zip code of 31000 voter address records would require a change of address documents signed by the voters. No data entry person is going make any changes without property documentation which would be change address forms signed by the voters as required by state law.
2. Every transaction against the voter database is saved by the system as part of an audit tail regardless of what the transaction might be.
3. Even it was possible to create 31,000 mail-in ballots with bad zip codes, this would be detected in the mail sorting machines. The ballots would be returned to the registrars office and would certainly not be picked up by just someone at the post office.

The silly assumptions that people make that voting systems are totally lacking in any security or audit trails and data can be easy manipulated is just not true. These systems are designed with specific functional capability. They are turnkey systems. They will accept only certain transaction. And exceptional change to voter records such as mass change would be treated as an election exception and require prior approval and would likely be preformed by the company that created and maintains the system.

BTW, Data Latency is the time it takes to send, execute and receive a response for a minimal database query. The latency usually consists of the following components: database server latency itself. network latency for a network path between the application and the database server (including network routers and switches. The latency is typically measured in fractions of a second. You are either misusing the term or you just writing bullshit.
 
Amazing, now, with a corrupted judiciary how do we fix this?
Democrats will surely try to steal the 2024 presidential election as well. Liberal judges did nothing to stop the 2020 election travesty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top