TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
"Go away boy, you bother me" W.C.FieldsYou think you have in your little mind, but you really haven't.
Next?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Go away boy, you bother me" W.C.FieldsYou think you have in your little mind, but you really haven't.
Next?
Again, I did not say anything about vaxxing people against their wiilThere are numerous things which are far riskier than this virus. Your chance of getting killed in a car accident is orders of magnitude higher, but we don't ban cars (despite the prog desire to make us all ride bicycles instead).
Your fear is no reason for anyone to be vaxxed against his will.
Oh, I'm a commie for pushing the Vaxx? You get the stupid prize for the dayYeah, I guess some people dying after getting the shot, along with other life threatening reactions isn't a reason. Others know they are allergic to the ingredients, I guess that's not a reason either. You commies are pathetic.
.
Nope:That is utter nonsense. We all have the right to be secure in our persons - including our privacy - out in public.
Only when smokers, drinkers, and others who make poor lifestyle decisions have to sign away their rights as well.How about this we don't force anyone to get the vaccine against her will but anyone who chooses not to must sign an affidavit in court, affirming that they are refusing the vaccine of their own free will. Then if they get covid their insurance company doesn't have to cover their treatment and they are placed at the back of the line anyone who did get the vaccine that bill got sick if treated before them and if they died because they treatment takes too long too bad
Getting your ass kicked bothers you, Gomer?"Go away boy, you bother me" W.C.Fields
Again, I did not say anything about vaxxing people against their wiil
And you driving analogy is a fale equivelancy andred herring logical fallacy
Nope:
PDF]
Privacy in Public? A Look at Recent Efforts to Recognize ...
ing general privacy rights in public spaces. Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in Public Places The U.S. Supreme Court has long-held that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in “what a person knowingly exposes to the public.”1 In analyzing the constitution-ality of searches under the Fourth since this amounts to nothing more,
Cool. Please remember that next time you butt in on abortion.Does a woman need to state a reason for getting an abortion? No?
Then STFU. Nobody owes you any explanation about their personal medical choices, Dumbass.
Not until it is viable outside the womb
It should be obvious what I ment by viable in relation to a fetus . Unfortunatly it was lost on youEither you don't know what viable means or you think a kid can be killed until they can survive on their own. I can think of a lot of adults that aren't viable, should we be allowed to kill them as well?
.
Privacy most certainly is situational. Forinstance, you have a reasonable expectation of privacy in yoiur home, but not when out in public.
So about 8-9 years old?Not until it is viable outside the womb
Of course they are.Rights are not situational.
I didn't say that it did. My post was in response to your dumbed down contention that privacy either exists or it does notNon sequitur much?
This has nothing to do with forcing people to be vaccinated or to show their "papers".
What about them. Is it me or are you circling then brain drain?So about 8-9 years old?
Oh, I'm a commie for pushing the Vaxx? You get the stupid prize for the day
Stopping people from "buying and selling" is pretty much out there for all to see.Again, I did not say anything about vaxxing people against their wiil
And you driving analogy is a fale equivelancy andred herring logical fallacy