HERE THEY ARE: The Five Most Obvious Acts of Fraud in the 2020 Election that You Are No Longer Allowed to Discuss

[Cellblock2429]

Dragonlady /——/ They didn’t take the cases, they didn’t look at the evidence, they refused to consider them. Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

 

[Care4all]

Dragonlady /——/ They didn’t take the cases, they didn’t look at the evidence, they refused to consider them. Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

As your article states even if the Pennsylvania supreme court hadn't ruled to allow post marked by election day absentee ballots to be accepted 3 days later, due to the actions of Trump and Post Master General DeJoy's cheating by purposely slowing down mail delivery on election ballots in big cities by reducing staff, removing fast sorting machines, and mail boxes, those ballots received under these PA Supreme court set rules, Joe Biden still would have won.


...the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election.

 

[jbrownson0831]

OldLady waah waah waah what kind of new leftyvirus pandemic are you cooking up for the midterms??

 

[busybee01]

Dragonlady /——/ They didn’t take the cases, they didn’t look at the evidence, they refused to consider them. Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

The Supreme Court only takes a tiny fraction of requests it gets. One justice's opinion means nothing except there are not 4 justices that want to take up the case.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Dragonlady /——/ They didn’t take the cases, they didn’t look at the evidence, they refused to consider them. Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

The Supreme Court only takes a tiny fraction of requests it gets. One justice's opinion means nothing except there are not 4 justices that want to take up the case.

/—-/ Thanks for making my point. The USSC didn’t examine the evidence or make a ruling. They passed on it.