Here is What Disqualifies Trump From Running for President

[IM2]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

 

[sparky]

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C1-1/ALDE_00013790/

which refers to>>>

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-3-1/ALDE_00001160/

So, is all ^^^this^^^ applicable to the old potus on 1-6 , before the swearing in of the new potus???

~S~

 

[IM2]

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C1-1/ALDE_00013790/

which refers to>>>

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-3-1/ALDE_00001160/

So, is all ^^^this^^^ applicable to the old potus on 1-6 , before the swearing in of the new potus???

~S~

According to Michael Luttig who would actually know, yes.

 

[theHawk]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

There is nothing in the Constitution that says you aren’t allowed to challenge an election. There is a legal process to do so, which is what President Trump believed should be followed. But it wasn’t even attempted anyway.

There was no armed “insurrection”, only a protest against an obviously rigged election.

 

[MinTrut]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

He didn't attempt to overturn anything; it's a deranged witch hunt.

INCREDIBLY dangerous sedition/treason/insurrection by the DeepSwamp/Democrats.

 

[MinTrut]

There is nothing in the Constitution that says you aren’t allowed to challenge an election. There is a legal process to do so, which is what President Trump believed should be followed. But it wasn’t even attempted anyway.

There was no armed “insurrection”, only a protest against an obviously rigged election.

Thread.

 

[Arlette]

He didn't attempt to overturn anything; it's a deranged witch hunt.

INCREDIBLY dangerous sedition/treason/insurrection by the DeepSwamp/Democrats.

Of course he did. He even knew it would get wild.

 

[MinTrut]

Of course he did.

Nope.

He even knew it would get wild.

He worried it might, so he both asked for more security - turrned down - and specifically called for a peaceful protest.

Worst. "Insurrectionest." EVER.

 

[Mac1958]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

Luttig is a brave man, and it's clear his heart is broken over what has happened to the GQP. Or, perhaps more accurately, what has been exposed about it.

He's probably fighting a losing battle, though, and I think it's because a lot of this country just doesn't give a shit any more.

 

[MinTrut]

Luttig = DeepSwamp Reptile

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

Funny how you loons will agree with this supposedly Conservative former Judges opinion on Trump, but any other thing from him would be meet with rabid disagreement. By the way Luttig identifies as an Independent.

 

[scruffy]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

Accusing your opponents of cheating is NOT a rebellion against the rules, you dumb fucktard.

Goddammit, these leftards have SHIT for brains. Stinky, smelly, ugly, disgusting SHIT comes out of them.


And AGAIN, a leftard in bed with a Neo-Con.

There's only one group of dumbass fucktards I despise more than the Neo-Scum, and I'll let you guess who they are.

 

[OKTexas]

According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Judge Luttig explains why Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency

The conservative retired jurist broke down the 14th Amendment, Trump's immunity argument, and what a second Trump term would mean.

www.msnbc.com

So what would the punishment for this be, considering he left the WH as prescribed in that clause? Come on race baiter, dazzle us with your brilliance.

.

 

[IM2]

Funny how you loons will agree with this supposedly Conservative former Judges opinion on Trump, but any other thing from him would be meet with rabid disagreement. By the way Luttig identifies as an Independent.

You are the loon. Trump violated the constitution. Unike other conservative judges, he's not trying to help trump stay above the law.

 

[IM2]

So what would the punishment for this be, considering he left the WH as prescribed in that clause? Come on race baiter, dazzle us with your brilliance.

.

I don't race bait. And if you could read you would see the punishment is disqualiification from running for President.

 

[IM2]

Accusing your opponents of cheating is NOT a rebellion against the rules, you dumb fucktard.

Goddammit, these leftards have SHIT for brains. Stinky, smelly, ugly, disgusting SHIT comes out of them.


And AGAIN, a leftard in bed with a Neo-Con.

There's only one group of dumbass fucktards I despise more than the Neo-Scum, and I'll let you guess who they are.

Since that's not what trump did, you need to just be quiet because no one cares what you like or don't like.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well I have to say I’m shocked and amazed that the OP is NOT saying Trump’s racism disqualifies him

 

[OKTexas]

I don't race bait. And if you could read you would see the punishment is disqualiification from running for President.

Disqualification for leaving office as constitutionally prescribed? Feel free to expand on that, if your extremely limited intellect will allow. BTW there's nothing in the Constitution that says anyone has to leave quietly, is there?

.

 

[IM2]

There is nothing in the Constitution that says you aren’t allowed to challenge an election. There is a legal process to do so, which is what President Trump believed should be followed. But it wasn’t even attempted anyway.

There was no armed “insurrection”, only a protest against an obviously rigged election.

Trump challenged the election. Hiis cclaim was found without meriit. It's time you trump cum gurgling bitches stopped lying abouut what trump did. In this case, we're looking at the opinion from an expert on the constitution. So if any of you have a problem with this, I'm sure Mr. Luttig has an email address or some kind of social meda presence whereby you all can argue using your vast legal knowledge to explain to Mr. Luttig how much he is in error.

 

[IM2]

Well I have to say I’m shocked and amazed that the OP is NOT saying Trump’s racism disqualifies him

That's a given.