Here is What Disqualifies Trump From Running for President

Most ridiculous analogy ever.

Trump did nothing wrong.

That you believe he did is genuinely frightening.

Please wake up.
no what i watched him do, for 4 long years, is genuinely disgusting. i will remain awake until we have cut the head from this snake.
 
no what i watched him do, for 4 long years, is genuinely disgusting. i will remain awake until we have cut the head from this snake.
Oh he's deplorable, as are many of his followers.

But he did nothing wrong in this matter, and is the victim of the most vicious, dangerous witch hunt in US history.
 
Oh he's deplorable, as are many of his followers.

But he did nothing wrong in this matter, and is the victim of the most vicious, dangerous witch hunt in US history.
we shall see in the fullness of time.
 
I don't race bait. And if you could read you would see the punishment is disqualiification from running for President.
The last judge approved for the Supreme Court and African American Female Progressive Socialist Communist would vote for animals and humans to have sexual relations. Disqualifications run rampant in politics.
 
That's a given.

democrat Party Presidents who are not racists

FDR: Tuskegee Experiments, perverted a legitimate scientific experiment and denied black treatments so the Administration could watch how black men died from syphilis; appointed a genuine Klansmen to SCOTUS

LBJ: Stalled IKE's Civil Rights Bill in the Senate, calling it the "****** Bill" until such time as he could pawn it off as his own; Said of his SCOTUS pick Thurgood Marshall 'Son, when I appoint a ****** to the bench, I want everybody to know he's a ******'; Passed the Great Society which replaced the black male head of household with a government check and made good on hos promise to “...have them ******* voting democrats for 200 years.”

BJ Clinton on Born in Kenya Barack “A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”


fwg7w-iacaapqek-jpg.853936
 
Last edited:
Just another attention whore drama queen looking for some air time. The 14th already addresses this issue, if it existed in the first place, which it doesn't. Congress can waive the disqualification. That's a post facto action, it can only be waived after an election. Not to mention the dozens of other Constitutional issues with this bogus witch hunt.
 
It is strange how the OP and the left seem to focus narrowly on just one section of the 14th while ignoring what the rest of the Amendment says.

Fourteenth Amendment​

Fourteenth Amendment Explained

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

So we see that the presumption of innocence is in full force by the language of Section 1. That there is no legal challenge to a citizen by dent of 'public opinion'. That absent a conviction for rebellion or insurrection, only Congress can set aside the right of a person to run for office.

That all of this deals with the Congress acting and that there is no provision in this Amendment for a court action against any candidate running for any office.
 
According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."


Concise, eloquent, and an utter waste of breath.
 
According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Even Democrats realize Trump will be on the ballot and are terrified he will win. Your fantasies are nothing but fantasies.
 
Trump challenged the election. Hiis cclaim was found without meriit. It's time you trump cum gurgling bitches stopped lying abouut what trump did. In this case, we're looking at the opinion from an expert on the constitution. So if any of you have a problem with this, I'm sure Mr. Luttig has an email address or some kind of social meda presence whereby you all can argue using your vast legal knowledge to explain to Mr. Luttig how much he is in error.
So did your 'heroine' SHillary and the Democratic Party, from about Nov.9th, 2016 thru to about Nov. 9th, 2020 which is when they fine tuned their methods to rig/steal a National Election.

One of many was to hamper and ham-string Trump's presidency was the continuous efforts to apply the false claim of "Trump colluded with the Russians"* with assorted kangaroo courts and "investigations" to fabricate "evidence" for convictions of Trump.

Trump's "crime" was that he wasn't from the fraternity of the Establishment Elite - de-facto Rulers of Earth - and since he was elected via means outside of their manipulative control, he had to go and his supporters be invalidated. Recall the many claims that "Trump stole the election from Hillary Clinton".

* If there was any Russian Collusion or aid to a candidate in the 2016 POTUS election it would have been to S'Hillary C. since she, her husband, and most of the DNC have been Russian "tools, fools, & stooges" for decades now.
 
Go tell Judge Luttig about how limited his knowledge of the constitution is. This man was a Federal Judge on the highest Federal District Court. Trump did not leave office as constitutionally prescribed.
As with all former POTUS, he is not required to leave office until the new POTUS has been sworn in.

Guess you don't know your Constitution. :rolleyes:
 
Yes, he tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
He questioned the validity of the 2020 election.
Which to you fascist, socialist/communists thugs is an "attempt to overturn" since it isn't submitting to your crimes and theft of that election.

Joe Stalin*: "Doesn't matter whom the people vote for, what matters is who is counting the ballots."
* = And a few other would be tyrants and fascists.
 
Last edited:
no what i watched him do, for 4 long years, is genuinely disgusting. i will remain awake until we have cut the head from this snake.
You remain a non-productive, parasitic wealth stealing piece of deadwood whom along with the rest of your "awake~woke" crowd of AntiFa insurrectionists are the real internal threat the survival of the USA.

You and your ilk are the seditious snakes that need to have their heads cut off, should it come to that. Knowing that some might grow-up out of the 'awake' ~ 'woke' delusions is one reason to "hold fire" for now.
 
According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

Only leftwing boobs fall for shit like this. You believe what you want to believe.
 
Go tell Judge Luttig about how limited his knowledge of the constitution is. This man was a Federal Judge on the highest Federal District Court. Trump did not leave office as constitutionally prescribed.
You mean he is still in office?
 
According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

I think it is hilarious that people actually still want Trump as president.
 
According to CONSERVATIVE Judge Michaeel Luttig, a constitutional expert, what disqualifies Trump from running for President is his violation of the Executive Vesting Clause of tthe Constitution.

"I would only say this: All that any of us are able to do is evaluate the positive, objective law — in this instance, the Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Under the plain, clear terms of Section 3, the former president would be disqualified from holding the presidency again — specifically, for the reason that his plan and effort and attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that the American people had voted to confer the powers of the presidency on Joe Biden, constitutes a clear violation of the Executive Vesting Clause in the Constitution, which prescribes that a president will hold office for only a four-year term, unless and until he is re-elected to the presidency by the American people. The former president’s effort to overturn the election and remain in power is precisely what constitutes a rebellion against the Constitution of the United States."

well said ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top