Here is the still photo taken by NY Times photographer of the bullet passing behind Trump's head.

[excalibur]

For the benefit of all my Trump Hater friends pushing the magic "glass shard" theory about Trump's ear. I'm sure they will all squeal that the NY Times has created a "cheap fake", but here it is.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid

Posted that a few days ago.

The question is, why did the photographer have his camera set at 1/8,000?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I don't tolerate fools. You're a massive one.

Cuck the Canuck

Don't contradict him. He wasn't brought up that way; his Mommy never told him "No!"

 

[luiza]

OF COURSE IT WAS A FAKE .
And here is Miles Mathis shredding the conspiracy that it was genuine

------ that was allegedly captured by a NYT photographer. Convenient.
So how fast was his shutter speed?
Well, they saw that question coming, because they tell us he was using a Sony A1 at 1/8000s.
Since Trump is not known to move 1000 feet per second himself, it is unclear why the photographer would be using that shutter speed.
But let's say he was.
At that shutter speed, how far would the bullet move?
Since this was an AR15, thebullet would have slowed to about 2000fps. So we just multiply. The bullet should have traveled ¼foot, or three inches..
Is that track 3 inches? No, it is about a foot, which is four times too long.
Obviously, the bullet would need to be moving 8000fps to make a track one foot long on a film open for 1/8000s.
Anyone can do that math. 8000/8000 = 1.

The NYT Photographer Doug Mills who allegedly took that photo is also covered in red flags.

He has won two Pulitzers, one for coverage of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which I have shown was also staged.
So, like the various government attorneys I have blown the cover of—Vincent Bugliosi,Marcia Clark, F. Lee Bailey, etc.—Mills appears to be a plant from Intel.

Just as the NYT is itself a CIA front asset---- my comment.

QED

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It doesn't line up with the top of his right ear, too low.

.

I thought the same thing.

.

 

[Mr Natural]

So close.





Yet so far away.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So close.





Yet so far away.

.

List candidate.







.

 

[PredFan]

Here is the meat of the picture blown up.

View attachment 979450

Two problems with it.

1. Where is the bullet. This is NOT a picture of a bullet.

2. On a clear day, there will be no contrails.


Conclusion. This is faked.

Contrail?? CONTRAIL??? Do you even know what a contrail is? lol. that's what a bullet looks like when it's supersonic. The shutter wasn't fast enough. Just how stupid are you?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Contrail?? CONTRAIL??? Do you even know what a contrail is? lol. that's what a bullet looks like when it's supersonic. The shutter wasn't fast enough. Just how stupid are you?

.

Stupid only just begins to describe it.

.

 

[luiza]

So close.





Yet so far away.

It's effing photo shopped .
See post 23 . Miles smashes the fact that it is Fake .
Anyhow , the blood is all wrong .
Hopeless .

 

[Vrenn]

Contrail?? CONTRAIL??? Do you even know what a contrail is? lol. that's what a bullet looks like when it's supersonic. The shutter wasn't fast enough. Just how stupid are you?

Got a ton of experience with weapons and unless the air is thick and wet, a bullet will NOT leave a contrail. Just like an Aircraft traveling in the subsonic range (like an airline) will only leave a contrail at over 20,000 feet and then when it gets to about 35,000+ feet the contrail disappears.

Being supersonic doesn't mean a thing. It has to be within a certain altitude and speed and a 556 far exceeds to speed required.

You MAGAts sure do like making crap up. Now, unless the picture was shot at some terrific shutter speed (not very damned likely) the bullet wouldn't have been seen on film.

I don't take away that a bullet might have been used. But unlike you, I am not going to try and sell a clearly doctored Paint Shop. Here's a good on for you. When you are dealing with pictures, the entire picture will have about the same background. Not the case on this one. Someone used the wind feature of a paint shop to create the so called bullet and then blended it in the original picture. What they didn't do was to fake the background. The main Background is in circulars while the added fake graphic is linear.

 

[PredFan]

Got a ton of experience with weapons and unless the air is thick and wet, a bullet will NOT leave a contrail. Just like an Aircraft traveling in the subsonic range (like an airline) will only leave a contrail at over 20,000 feet and then when it gets to about 35,000+ feet the contrail disappears.

Being supersonic doesn't mean a thing. It has to be within a certain altitude and speed and a 556 far exceeds to speed required.

You MAGAts sure do like making crap up. Now, unless the picture was shot at some terrific shutter speed (not very damned likely) the bullet wouldn't have been seen on film.

I don't take away that a bullet might have been used. But unlike you, I am not going to try and sell a clearly doctored Paint Shop. Here's a good on for you. When you are dealing with pictures, the entire picture will have about the same background. Not the case on this one. Someone used the wind feature of a paint shop to create the so called bullet and then blended it in the original picture. What they didn't do was to fake the background. The main Background is in circulars while the added fake graphic is linear.

It's not a contrail, dumbass. It's a picture of a bullet that moves faster than the shutter speed. Simple enough logic for most people, not for you though, apparently.

 

[pknopp]

Once again, you shoot at a fast shutter speed at an event like this because you are shooting the lens wide open. You shoot wide open to blur (bokeh) the background. With the lens wide open in bright daylight you don't want the shutter open any longer than necessary so less light get in.

Now if he was there to shoot a planned family photo then he would perhaps use different settings BUT in a fast moving event where the cameraman is moving around getting different shots he sets his camera to get the best shot he can get in many scenario's.

Shooting in RAW, any slight adjustments can be made in post processing. In this picture he was shooting from below but straight on there would have been the distraction of people and blurring them allows Trump to be the focus. To do this you need a fast lens shooting wide open.

He wasn't trying to shoot something very fast, he was blurring the background.

You also can't compare what you might have done 20, or even 10 years ago. The new camera's capabilities are far and away better than what once was. I have a Nikon D750 which is more than enough camera for me but the new ones make it appear obsolete to a professional.

 

[Vrenn]

It's not a contrail, dumbass. It's a picture of a bullet that moves faster than the shutter speed. Simple enough logic for most people, not for you though, apparently.

And it's faked.