Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
^^^^^^^
There he goes spamming that mutilated document for the 10000th time.
We've already shown you that the same documents clearly state that Palestinian identity and nationality are a NEW CONCEPT. Moron.
There is not government capable or taking control. PA gave up on gaza. How can they represent the palestinians let alone for a new government?
Hamas is even making it's own truce with Israel.
Who is going to pay wages, supply services, arrange trade deals, seek investments police the people, speak for the state, negotiate.......
They certainly can't arrange election. They can't protect their people in refugee camps or save those trapped and dying in Syria. They would not even let Israel arrange safe passage to the WB.
wasn't the point I was trying to make. The point that Zionism Apologists make is that the League of Nations or the UN gave Palestine to the Jews, like it was theirs to give away. (It wasn't.)
The Ottoman collapsed. The land became a mandate. It was to be divided into states.
The Ottoman had already encouraged Jews to return to their historic homeland in the 19th C.
It was the responsibility of the mandate to divide the land. With the exception of Lebanon, which was autonomous under the Ottoman, there was no sense of unity or identity as a people.
It was not so much giving land away as building states.
There were Jews that had their own identity. Jews from other parts of the Ottoman had already settled in land that was under populated and unable to create enough income to even pay taxes.
There had already been migration out of the Ottoman due to hardships and crop failure. Many tried to make it to the US.
There were a 500,000 on an land that was capable in the time of the Romans of supporting several million. Most were tenants, share croppers and migrants farmers. Most did not own the land. There was a lack of land registration because people did not want to pay taxes or do military service. Even during the mandate when give the chance they did not register land. For economic and tax purposes it was a land without a people. The arabs that did live there did not own the land they worked and most were tribal. The land was run as a feudal system. When land was sold the workers had no right to stay. When a building is sold for development, the tenants have to move out, they do not own their apartments. When buildings go condo, not everyone can afford to buy their apartments. Many building have association and new buyers have to be voted in before they can buy. It was much the same in the mandate.
Jews built communities and started business creating jobs for the arabs. Many of those that had land would rather sell the land. Even the churches were selling land. It was not arabs but jews that were willing to buy.
The mandate did not 'give' land away, they divided the land the land in a way to create states. Jordan, Iraq and Syria came to be rules by arabs from Mecca. They had been forced out by another tribe. Syria was originally divided into five state. King in Iraq and syria. There were internal fighting and massacres. The people were not a unite group of state. After the Ottoman there was no identity or cohesion among the people. Every state had it's division and problems creating a national identity, they still are.
When the time came, arabs and jews were offered statehood. Arabs rejected the idea, the jews accepted.
The palestinians couldn't form a united government. They just resigned. The palestinians are too divided to become a state. The problem is not Israel, it is the palestinians themselves. They are not ready.
Zionist propaganda again. All bullshit.
Yes, the concept of a Palestinian people was unheard of before. Would you like a tissue?^^^^^^^
There he goes spamming that mutilated document for the 10000th time.
We've already shown you that the same documents clearly state that Palestinian identity and nationality are a NEW CONCEPT. Moron.
Relatively new in 1921 you moron.
By the way, you now demonstrate your misogynistic character by including a little video of "bitch slapping" . Reall nice you little coward.
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
The land was LoN gained in 1917 when the Ottomans surrendered. It had not been arab muslim land since 1099
So if the UN votes to give palestine back to the Palestinians, you are going to be cool with that, right?
Hey did you hear about that suicide vest thing your Islamic brethren started?
Wouldn't know. I don't need to believe in Magic Sky fairies that make you fight over a strip of desert. Eventually, those guys are probably going to win because you Zionists don't have that level of commitment...
They cant as they don't have the authority to alter International law, but if you mean the original Palestinians named by the Romans and then the muslims I will applaud them. You see until 1960 the only Palestinians in the M.E. where the Jews.
What does the arab muslim suicide vests have to do with your neo Marxist dogma. I want them all to wear suicide vests and show their commitment, then they will wipe themselves out in the biggest chain reaction ever seen
Usual Zionist propaganda. You will note that the Jews called themselves Zionists and the Arabs called themselves the people of Palestine.
PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.
No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.
HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
From 1922
Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable. If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration.
- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
Wow, you certainly have a logical mind. The British communicate with the people of Palestinian in writing in 1921 and Ruddy says it means there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people".
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
Wow, you certainly have a logical mind. The British communicate with the people of Palestinian in writing in 1921 and Ruddy says it means there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people".
Because they don't see themselves as Palestinians, just as syrians
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
NOPE freddy boy that is what the British called them if you look
Who was this Zionist Organization representing?
PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.
They accepted the LoN Covenant, but not the convoluted "interpretation" of the colonizers and their facilitators, the British. They certainly did not accept the Mandate which, turns out, was simply a vehicle to facilitate the colonization of Palestine.
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
Wow, you certainly have a logical mind. The British communicate with the people of Palestinian in writing in 1921 and Ruddy says it means there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people".
Because they don't see themselves as Palestinians, just as syrians
Why would they call themselves the people of Palestine instead of the people of Syria?
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
NOPE freddy boy that is what the British called them if you look
How can that be, as the Palestinians wrote the text in the letter? It was the Palestinian delegation that was staying at the Hotel Cecil.
HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir, -
.............................Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
Wow, you certainly have a logical mind. The British communicate with the people of Palestinian in writing in 1921 and Ruddy says it means there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people".
It was heard of in 1921, that's what the official documents prove. Need a shoulder to cry on? Phoney is there for you.
Which means no such thing as a "Palestinian people". Thank you for proving my point.
Wow, you certainly have a logical mind. The British communicate with the people of Palestinian in writing in 1921 and Ruddy says it means there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people".
Because they don't see themselves as Palestinians, just as syrians
Why would they call themselves the people of Palestine instead of the people of Syria?
The palestinians couldn't form a united government. They just resigned. The palestinians are too divided to become a state. The problem is not Israel, it is the palestinians themselves. They are not ready.
In 1923 when the LoN had sovereignty over the whole of the M.E. they could dispose of that land any way they wanted.
:
