Helping the blind see again, yet another Zionist Israeli contribution to humanity and peace

[JoeB131]

Wrong again. There are almost two million Arab Muslim citizens in Israel that have the same exact rights as do the Jews and Christians. But let's talk about the topic of this thread, something you cannot absorb

So 2 million out of 10 million Palestinians have limited rights in an apartheid state, and this is good for you.

The rest of the world... not so much.

APARTHEID!!!

 

[Roudy]

Wrong again. There are almost two million Arab Muslim citizens in Israel that have the same exact rights as do the Jews and Christians. But let's talk about the topic of this thread, something you cannot absorb

So 2 million out of 10 million Palestinians have limited rights in an apartheid state, and this is good for you.

The rest of the world... not so much.

APARTHEID!!!

Yeah why not go for 20 million while you're at it. Another fulla shit asshole.

 

[Phoenall]

The palestinians couldn't form a united government. They just resigned. The palestinians are too divided to become a state. The problem is not Israel, it is the palestinians themselves. They are not ready.

No, the problem is that you have an apartheid European occupation. Any claims about how the "brown people" aren't ready is ... racism.

Still waiting for you to provide a link from an unbiased source proving your claims

 

[Phoenall]

In 1923 when the LoN had sovereignty over the whole of the M.E. they could dispose of that land any way they wanted.

Okay, two can play at that game.

In 1940, Germany had sovereignty over Poland and could dispose of the land (and the people on it) any way they wanted.

So quit whining about the fucking Holocaust.

The real problem was the Woodrow Wilson had it right. Self-Determination of nations. The French and British just wanted to extend their empires. Resettle Europe's Jews in a colony.

We are still dealing with all the fuckups of how the LoN disposed of that land.

No they didn't they did not have a surrender treaty giving them sovereignty. So they could not dispose of Poland at all, they where just occupiers of the land.
You are the one who brought up the holocaust not me, invoking Godwins law
Show where the Palestinians have shown any real self determination since 1967. 80% of the Jews in Israel were born there so have no ties to Europe, Russia, America etc.
Nope we are dealing with an arrogant, violent, aggressive 7C cult that believe they own the world, and the sooner we pull the rug from under their feet the better

 

[Phoenall]

Wrong again. There are almost two million Arab Muslim citizens in Israel that have the same exact rights as do the Jews and Christians. But let's talk about the topic of this thread, something you cannot absorb

So 2 million out of 10 million Palestinians have limited rights in an apartheid state, and this is good for you.

The rest of the world... not so much.

APARTHEID!!!

LINK proving your claim.

AND STOP GOING OFF TOPIC

 

[JoeB131]

No they didn't they did not have a surrender treaty giving them sovereignty. So they could not dispose of Poland at all, they where just occupiers of the land.

Exactly. Just like the Zionists are. so when the Palestinians Push you into the sea, they will be totally justified.

 

[Phoenall]

No they didn't they did not have a surrender treaty giving them sovereignty. So they could not dispose of Poland at all, they where just occupiers of the land.

Exactly. Just like the Zionists are. so when the Palestinians Push you into the sea, they will be totally justified.

The LoN transferred sovereignty to the Jews in 1923, or are you now saying that Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt don't exist as they where created under the same mandates.

 

[JoeB131]

The LoN transferred sovereignty to the Jews in 1923, or are you now saying that Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt don't exist as they where created under the same mandates.

the LoN did no such thing.

Leaving aside that Iran existed in it current borders before the LON (Being hemmed in by the British, Russian and Ottoman Empires).

Egypt was an exant nation before WWI as well, as a British Client state with its own Monarchy. So second argument fail.

Jordan, Iraq and Syria ARE artificial nations, which is why two of them are in anarchy today.

 

[Phoenall]

The LoN transferred sovereignty to the Jews in 1923, or are you now saying that Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt don't exist as they where created under the same mandates.

the LoN did no such thing.

Leaving aside that Iran existed in it current borders before the LON (Being hemmed in by the British, Russian and Ottoman Empires).

Egypt was an exant nation before WWI as well, as a British Client state with its own Monarchy. So second argument fail.

Jordan, Iraq and Syria ARE artificial nations, which is why two of them are in anarchy today.

Wrong much as you would like it to true. Iran was part of the Ottoman empire, or at least parts of it where. Egypt was part of the Ottoman empire and had to be granted borders by the LoN after 1817. It was the three mandated powers Russia, France and Britain that controlled the land until such a time as the nations could stand on their own feet. The LoN as the sovereign rulers could do what the wanted back in 1923 as there were no international laws stopping them.

 

[Roudy]

No they didn't they did not have a surrender treaty giving them sovereignty. So they could not dispose of Poland at all, they where just occupiers of the land.

Exactly. Just like the Zionists are. so when the Palestinians Push you into the sea, they will be totally justified.

But Joehammad, the topic of this thread isn't yet another Muslim jerkoff session of Arabs pushing Israel into the sea.

 

[Roudy]

The LoN transferred sovereignty to the Jews in 1923, or are you now saying that Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt don't exist as they where created under the same mandates.

the LoN did no such thing.

Leaving aside that Iran existed in it current borders before the LON (Being hemmed in by the British, Russian and Ottoman Empires).

Egypt was an exant nation before WWI as well, as a British Client state with its own Monarchy. So second argument fail.

Jordan, Iraq and Syria ARE artificial nations, which is why two of them are in anarchy today.

Hah! Jordan, Syria, and Iraq are artificial nations, but Palestine isn't!

It doesn't get any better. A laugh a minute.

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong much as you would like it to true. Iran was part of the Ottoman empire, or at least parts of it where.

Uh, no, actually, t wasn't. Here's the borders of Iran in 1914. And in 1922. They are the same borders they have today.

Egypt was part of the Ottoman empire and had to be granted borders by the LoN after 1817.

There was no League of nations in 1817. Or 1917 in case you try to claim that was a typo. In fact, the British had taken over Egypt in the 19th century. It's how they were able to loot all the archaeological treasures and build the Suez Canal.

It was the three mandated powers Russia, France and Britain that controlled the land until such a time as the nations could stand on their own feet.

Wrong again. By 1917, Russia was out of the War because the Commies took over. France and England did divy up someone else's land, which was pretty shitty of them, but that didn't make it right. Nor their attempt to solidify their hold on Palestine by transplanting a bunch of European Jews there.

 

[JoeB131]

Hah! Jordan, Syria, and Iraq are artificial nations, but Palestine isn't!

It doesn't get any better. A laugh a minute.

Point is, the Arabs belong there. The Jews don't.

 

[aris2chat]

The LoN transferred sovereignty to the Jews in 1923, or are you now saying that Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Egypt don't exist as they where created under the same mandates.

the LoN did no such thing.

Leaving aside that Iran existed in it current borders before the LON (Being hemmed in by the British, Russian and Ottoman Empires).

Egypt was an exant nation before WWI as well, as a British Client state with its own Monarchy. So second argument fail.

Jordan, Iraq and Syria ARE artificial nations, which is why two of them are in anarchy today.

That was the Ottoman Empire, and most of Lebanon was autonomous

 

[Phoenall]

Wrong much as you would like it to true. Iran was part of the Ottoman empire, or at least parts of it where.

Uh, no, actually, t wasn't. Here's the borders of Iran in 1914. And in 1922. They are the same borders they have today.

Egypt was part of the Ottoman empire and had to be granted borders by the LoN after 1817.

There was no League of nations in 1817. Or 1917 in case you try to claim that was a typo. In fact, the British had taken over Egypt in the 19th century. It's how they were able to loot all the archaeological treasures and build the Suez Canal.

It was the three mandated powers Russia, France and Britain that controlled the land until such a time as the nations could stand on their own feet.

Wrong again. By 1917, Russia was out of the War because the Commies took over. France and England did divy up someone else's land, which was pretty shitty of them, but that didn't make it right. Nor their attempt to solidify their hold on Palestine by transplanting a bunch of European Jews there.

Did you see Iran on that map because I didn't. I also see where the ottoman Empire dissects Egypt and Saudion both sides, How many nations are now occupying that land created under the same mandate as Israel was.

The LoN negotiated the surrender of the ottoman empire in 1917 if you look at the history books, Russia was given a mandate the same as France and Britain

 

[Phoenall]

Hah! Jordan, Syria, and Iraq are artificial nations, but Palestine isn't!

It doesn't get any better. A laugh a minute.

Point is, the Arabs belong there. The Jews don't.

No the arabs belong in Arabia the Jews belong in Judea

 

[aris2chat]

Wrong much as you would like it to true. Iran was part of the Ottoman empire, or at least parts of it where.

Uh, no, actually, t wasn't. Here's the borders of Iran in 1914. And in 1922. They are the same borders they have today.

Egypt was part of the Ottoman empire and had to be granted borders by the LoN after 1817.

There was no League of nations in 1817. Or 1917 in case you try to claim that was a typo. In fact, the British had taken over Egypt in the 19th century. It's how they were able to loot all the archaeological treasures and build the Suez Canal.

It was the three mandated powers Russia, France and Britain that controlled the land until such a time as the nations could stand on their own feet.

Wrong again. By 1917, Russia was out of the War because the Commies took over. France and England did divy up someone else's land, which was pretty shitty of them, but that didn't make it right. Nor their attempt to solidify their hold on Palestine by transplanting a bunch of European Jews there.

Using a map of the empire after WWI? Empire was already falling apart.

As for Russia....
Eastern Front World War I - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[aris2chat]

Hah! Jordan, Syria, and Iraq are artificial nations, but Palestine isn't!

It doesn't get any better. A laugh a minute.

Point is, the Arabs belong there. The Jews don't.

No the arabs belong in Arabia the Jews belong in Judea

They belonged in the sanjuk of Jerusalem

 

[JoeB131]

That was the Ottoman Empire, and most of Lebanon was autonomous

Yeah- WAS back in the 1600. By 1918, it was the "Sick Man of Europe" and they were looking for ways to steal their remaining possessions.

 

[JoeB131]

No the arabs belong in Arabia the Jews belong in Judea

The Arabs are middle eastern and the Jews are European. They need to go back to Europe where they came from.