Hegseth (at Trump's urging) is removing "Woke" policies from the military but in an overly aggressive way!

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Do you want a woke military defending you or a strong merit based military defending you?...

.

Left cultists want the army with the prettiest rainbow uniforms and matching nail polish.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yup, all you get from Luckeone is AI's, and memes to formulate his 'discussion'.

.

Yep, the cult actually believes that AI is valid.

.

 

[Luckyone]

This post is called Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Luchywun has got the TDS and it's a bad case of it.

Absolutely correct. I am 150% against Trump becoming a Trump Dictator Shepherd

 

[sartre play]

What an ugly web we weave, when we practice to deceive.

 

[marvin martian]

I experienced second-hand embarrassment for him seeing "AI Overview" over and over and over. For starters, as amazing as AI is, it still gets a lot wrong. I mean, a lot. Even the most basic stuff. Second, it just screams that liberals truly have no ability to think critically or even form their own original thoughts.

AI is going to be the total death of the left. They were already very easy to fool (think the "drinking bleach" lie). With AI, it's only going to be easier, and it will undo them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hegseth (at Trump's urging) is removing "Woke" policies from the military but in an overly aggressive way!

AI Overview

The term "woke policies" is a politically charged and controversial phrase, primarily used by critics to label policies perceived as excessively progressive on issues of race, gender, sexuality, and social justice.

A very rare (and over the top) meeting was arranged where over 776 U.S. generals from all over the world (more than 400 of them being oversees) were brought in to Quantico at a very high cost.

Hegseth's mystery meeting in Quantico could cost millions, require unprecedented security​

Ben Hodges, the former commanding general of U.S. Army Europe, posted to X, referencing when Adolf Hitler summoned German generals in 1935 to swear a "personal loyalty oath to the Führer."

The meeting was arranged for this reason:

AI Overview

News reports from late September 2025 indicate that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and former President Donald Trump are moving forward with plans to assert political control over the U.S. military leadership. This includes significant firings of senior military officials and the forced attendance of hundreds of generals and admirals at a highly unusual meeting at Marine Corps Base Quantico. Critics have voiced concern that these actions are an attempt to install military leaders based on loyalty rather than merit, which could undermine the military's traditional apolitical nature.

Hegseth slams 'fat generals,' says U.S. officers should resign if they don't support his agenda​

• Trump's executive order renamed Department of Defense to Department of War

WASHINGTON, Sept 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth slammed "fat generals" and diversity initiatives that he said led to decades of decay in the military and told a rare gathering of commanders on Tuesday they should resign if they don't support his agenda.

Why is this likely to be the reason for this meeting?

Following the "Dictator's Guideline Book":

AI Overview

According to the political theory outlined in The Dictator's Handbook, a leader's ability to maintain power relies on a "winning coalition" of loyal and essential supporters. For dictators, this small but powerful group often includes the military, making their loyalty a prime requirement for survival.

Are we on the way for this to happen?

View attachment 1167988

​

Uninformed sources tell me that they will demand a blood loyalty oath to MAGA!

They said they’ll fire more Generals than Obama for noncompliance

 

[Luckyone]

Proof positive of TDS from lukyone.
All though, Trump does have an ego, show me a billionaire who doesn't.
Dictator? BS He's a business man who knows how to run a business despite
what the left thinks or perceives. He's had success this year because he has for the most
part the right people in the right jobs. AND, they aren't trying to undermine every
move he makes.

Trump doesn't have an narcissistic (over the top of the scale) ego?

Hahahaha, that is hilarious

 

[Luckyone]

In other words, you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Got it. Now for a major dose of reality. "Dictators" don't reject power (as President Trump has done over and over by returning power back to the states in accordance with the U.S. Constitution). They assume powers they don't have (like Obama did egregiously pissing all over the U.S. Constitution over and over).

Isn't it scary that the left is so bat-shit crazy extremist, they lose their ever-loving-mind over small, limited, constitutional government? It's not surprise at all that you people turn to violence to achieve your political agenda. Just like the Nazi Brownshirts.

Donald Trump: The 'Fascist' Who Cuts Taxes And Deregulates

Everybody knows by now that President Trump is a fascist. He's a Nazi just like the white supremacists who marched in Charlottesville, Va., on Aug. 12. We know this because... Read More

www.investors.com

Opposing Trump Dictator Shepherd is certainly tied in to (and be a good reason) to have the TDS you talk about.

 

[marvin martian]

Trump doesn't have an narcissistic (over the top of the scale) ego?

Hahahaha, that is hilarious

You dummies are SO easy to troll. And President Trump is the master. He plays you like a fiddle. Every time.

 

[Meister]

Trump doesn't have an narcissistic (over the top of the scale) ego?

Hahahaha, that is hilarious

This is just more of your TDS affliction. It just can't be helped.

 

[Luckyone]

This is just more of your TDS affliction. It just can't be helped.

Wow, Trump himself proving you wrong is MY TDS?

I have to believe that it is you that has TDS (Trump DEVOTION Syndrome)

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[Luckyone]

 

[Luckyone]

I seriously cannot get over that statement. Removing DEI in an "overly aggressive way". How beta-male weak does one have to be to find eliminating policy "overly aggressive"?

"I'm so weak, I can only handle 1 policy changes per month"

Let me make as clear as I can for you.

The one thing that rules the military in a Democratic (not Dictatorship) nation is defending the people in the nation and that also includes defending human rights.

The difference between a Democratic nation military and a Dictatorship military is that in the latter, human rights are thrown out the window and the ONLY rights that exist are those of the leader (Dictator) of the nation. In a Democratic nation, the military will not step on and tear the rights away from the people, no matter what the leader says.

Here and in more of a specific way:

"The Role of the Military in a Democracy"​

The Role of the Military in a Democracy is an ever-relevant concern which was already raised by Plato 2500 years. The principle of political control of armed forces as we know it today is rooted in the concept of a representative democracy. It refers to the supremacy of civilian institutions, based on popular sovereignty, over the de-fense and security policy-making apparatus, including the military leadership.

Democratic control should always be a two-way process between armed forces and society. In a democracy, firm constitutional guarantees should protect the state - including the armed forces - from two types of potential dangers: from politicians, who have military ambitions, and from military with political ambitions.

Here, what Trump and Hegseth are doing, is taking control of the military exclusively for what THEY decide to do and the Constitution and the human rights of the people are to be thrown away!!!!

 

[marvin martian]

Let me make as clear as I can for you.

The one thing that rules the military in a Democratic (not Dictatorship) nation is defending the people in the nation and that also includes defending human rights.

The difference between a Democratic nation military and a Dictatorship military is that in the latter, human rights are thrown out the window and the ONLY rights that exist are those of the leader (Dictator) of the nation. In a Democratic nation, the military will not step on and tear the rights away from the people, no matter what the leader says.

Here and in more of a specific way:

"The Role of the Military in a Democracy"​

The Role of the Military in a Democracy is an ever-relevant concern which was already raised by Plato 2500 years. The principle of political control of armed forces as we know it today is rooted in the concept of a representative democracy. It refers to the supremacy of civilian institutions, based on popular sovereignty, over the de-fense and security policy-making apparatus, including the military leadership.

Democratic control should always be a two-way process between armed forces and society. In a democracy, firm constitutional guarantees should protect the state - including the armed forces - from two types of potential dangers: from politicians, who have military ambitions, and from military with political ambitions.

Here, what Trump and Hegseth are doing, is taking control of the military exclusively for what THEY decide to do and the Constitution and the human rights of the people are to be thrown away!!!!

Your AI cut and pastes are shit. Why can't you think for yourself?

 

[WEATHER53]

Your AI cut and pastes are shit. Why can't you think for yourself?

I thought they were required to attribute where their instantaneous responses come from??

 

[leftwinger]

Hegseth (at Trump's urging) is removing "Woke" policies from the military but in an overly aggressive way!

AI Overview

The term "woke policies" is a politically charged and controversial phrase, primarily used by critics to label policies perceived as excessively progressive on issues of race, gender, sexuality, and social justice.

A very rare (and over the top) meeting was arranged where over 776 U.S. generals from all over the world (more than 400 of them being oversees) were brought in to Quantico at a very high cost.

Hegseth's mystery meeting in Quantico could cost millions, require unprecedented security​

Ben Hodges, the former commanding general of U.S. Army Europe, posted to X, referencing when Adolf Hitler summoned German generals in 1935 to swear a "personal loyalty oath to the Führer."

The meeting was arranged for this reason:

AI Overview

News reports from late September 2025 indicate that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and former President Donald Trump are moving forward with plans to assert political control over the U.S. military leadership. This includes significant firings of senior military officials and the forced attendance of hundreds of generals and admirals at a highly unusual meeting at Marine Corps Base Quantico. Critics have voiced concern that these actions are an attempt to install military leaders based on loyalty rather than merit, which could undermine the military's traditional apolitical nature.

Hegseth slams 'fat generals,' says U.S. officers should resign if they don't support his agenda​

• Trump's executive order renamed Department of Defense to Department of War

WASHINGTON, Sept 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth slammed "fat generals" and diversity initiatives that he said led to decades of decay in the military and told a rare gathering of commanders on Tuesday they should resign if they don't support his agenda.

Why is this likely to be the reason for this meeting?

Following the "Dictator's Guideline Book":

AI Overview

According to the political theory outlined in The Dictator's Handbook, a leader's ability to maintain power relies on a "winning coalition" of loyal and essential supporters. For dictators, this small but powerful group often includes the military, making their loyalty a prime requirement for survival.

Are we on the way for this to happen?

View attachment 1167988

​

Tl:dnr

Who cares? As long as its cleaned out. You're wasting time on homeo fruitcakes in dresses and red pumps. SHUP about it.

 

[Luckyone]

Tl:dnr

Who cares? As long as its cleaned out. You're wasting time on homeo fruitcakes in dresses and red pumps. SHUP about it.

Who cares? Really? You mean that losing our Democratic Republic and replacing it with a Dictatorship is not important enough to talk about it?

Or is it that YOU don't care and you do not want anyone bringing that situation to the attention of all?

 

[Meister]

Let me make as clear as I can for you.

The one thing that rules the military in a Democratic (not Dictatorship) nation is defending the people in the nation and that also includes defending human rights.

The difference between a Democratic nation military and a Dictatorship military is that in the latter, human rights are thrown out the window and the ONLY rights that exist are those of the leader (Dictator) of the nation. In a Democratic nation, the military will not step on and tear the rights away from the people, no matter what the leader says.

Here and in more of a specific way:

"The Role of the Military in a Democracy"​

The Role of the Military in a Democracy is an ever-relevant concern which was already raised by Plato 2500 years. The principle of political control of armed forces as we know it today is rooted in the concept of a representative democracy. It refers to the supremacy of civilian institutions, based on popular sovereignty, over the de-fense and security policy-making apparatus, including the military leadership.

Democratic control should always be a two-way process between armed forces and society. In a democracy, firm constitutional guarantees should protect the state - including the armed forces - from two types of potential dangers: from politicians, who have military ambitions, and from military with political ambitions.

Here, what Trump and Hegseth are doing, is taking control of the military exclusively for what THEY decide to do and the Constitution and the human rights of the people are to be thrown away!!!!

From YOUR source

The Role of the Military in a Democracy.....

• They participate in maintaining public order, with and without arms, by

• providing administrative assistance

• performing protective functions

• assisting the police in emergencies

To avoid any misunderstanding - in the latter case, armed forces are the ultima ratio when police and border guard forces are not able to handle the situation in a common effort.



By the way, can you name any dictators that relinquishes their power and gives it back to the states?
I'm sure you can answer that, after all, you're spewing your shit all over the board about dictators.

 

[marvin martian]

Who cares? Really? You mean that losing our Democratic Republic and replacing it with a Dictatorship is not important enough to talk about it?

Or is it that YOU don't care and you do not want anyone bringing that situation to the attention of all?

^^^Here's the guy whining about a "dictatorship" now: