Heat and the Universe

[trevorjohnson83]

Heat and the universe
The one main element that is universal is heat. Even empty space (which really isn't empty) has a background temperature and density from the heat squeezing on the universal medium.
A gravity field is heat and density at a standstill. Since it originates at the nucleus we can assume the nucleus is very dense and hot itself. Unlike energy which is heat and density expanding to areea's that are cooler, the heat and density of a gravity field is at a standstill. We can then assume the cold background temperature of near empty space actually originates from a core nucleues to our own universe. This would explain away how much matter is actually in the universe.
When we look at an explosion like the big bang or a supernovae, we can assume that a sudden change in temperature is responsible for the sudden expansion of density and heat. If the outside of the universe had suddenly changed temperatures from departing a 'warmer' area, this would release a lot of heat and density for the universe to expand and be habitable.
Energy is an area of heat/density that has been set free from a source of density, whether its fusion or a lightbulb. If you bang something long enough it heats up because you are converting momentum energy into heat/density at the spot of banging.
When energy that has temperature and is free moving enters the gravity field of the nucleus, it penetrates up to the point that matches the temperature of heat and density coming from the nucleus, then gets stuck in the appropriate shell for reasons unknown.
When the heat and density of two gravity fields touch, they squeeze on each other and pull together the two masses based on there size.

 

[Grumblenuts]

The Aether field consists of complementary magnetic and dielectric fields which produce space and counterspace respectively. Space allows matter. Counterspace allows energy.

So matter? Think magnetic / space.
Energy? Think (di)electric / counterspace.

Each is constantly emerging from and disappearing into the other at every imaginable scale thanks to the incommensurable nature of the Aether. Flowers appear to grow outward from their center and cease growing at their periphery. But the Aether actually connects each bit into a continuous circuit through the local environment and guides its growth until no longer sustainable for lack of one key resource or another. This endless cycle of life / death reveals nature to be simultaneously constructive and destructive. Matter is constantly being created and destroyed. The Aether insists upon always recycling whether we like it or not.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Heat and the universe
The one main element that is universal is heat. Even empty space (which really isn't empty) has a background temperature and density from the heat squeezing on the universal medium.

A). Presuming our "Universe" to be only what we can observe through our fancy telescopes as always..

The temperature of the cosmic background radiation they measured was 5.08 Kelvin (+/- 0.10 Kelvin). This is extremely cold, but significantly warmer than the temperature which scientists measure in today’s universe, 2.73 Kelvin. Scientists measure temperatures in Kelvin above absolute zero (0 Kelvin = -273 degrees Celsius). One Kelvin is the same size as one degree Celsius. The temperature of the cosmic background radiation in the past has been measured before, at even larger distances. But this is the most precise measurement yet of the ambient temperature when the universe was younger than it is now. According to the Big bang theory, the temperature of the cosmic background radiation drops smoothly as the universe expands. That’s just what the astronomers measure. The universe of a few billion years ago was a few degrees warmer than it is now, exactly as the Big bang theory predicts.

Coincidently, one can safely bet that everything else shall always turn out to be "exactly as the Big bang theory predicts" since A). shall always apply. Circular reasoning remaining astoundingly circular!

But Trevor, as you can see, they're really measuring the temperature "of the cosmic background radiation," not that of "the Universe" or "Even empty space (which really" is empty by definition . Plus you even said yourself before changing your mind. "Space" can also be used to mean space + all matter, but see, there's still that pesky empty space part one simply can't ignore.

 

[Grumblenuts]

So what is it? What are they actually measuring if not

the cold background temperature of near empty space

? The apparent temperature or heat (of the local universe) remaining some 13.7 billion years ago as matter first materialized some 380,000 or so years after the "Bang" (or "Big" energy release from counterspace). Please do not fail to notice how we're still just measuring a temperature of matter, not that of any kind of "empty space."

 

[trevorjohnson83]

The Aether field consists of complementary magnetic and dielectric fields which produce space and counterspace respectively. Space allows matter. Counterspace allows energy.

So matter? Think magnetic / space.
Energy? Think (di)electric / counterspace.

Each is constantly emerging from and disappearing into the other at every imaginable scale thanks to the incommensurable nature of the Aether. Flowers appear to grow outward from their center and cease growing at their periphery. But the Aether actually connects each bit into a continuous circuit through the local environment and guides its growth until no longer sustainable for lack of one key resource or another. This endless cycle of life / death reveals nature to be simultaneously constructive and destructive. Matter is constantly being created and destroyed. The Aether insists upon always recycling whether we like it or not.

Do you think the aether is responsible for magnetic fields? how?

So what is it? What are they actually measuring if not

? The apparent temperature or heat (of the local universe) remaining some 13.7 billion years ago as matter first materialized some 380,000 or so years after the "Bang" (or "Big" energy release from counterspace). Please do not fail to notice how we're still just measuring a temperature of matter, not that of any kind of "empty space."

I suppose you're right. The outside must still vary in temperature influencing the temperature of our universe. But excuse me for assuming, are you saying the universe is still cooling off like an oven? At what temperature does that stop?

And what about heat at a standstill? could that have been what Planck was describing in black box radiation that made him crazy?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Do you think the aether is responsible for magnetic fields? how?

Not going over all that here again. You're welcome to search "Ken Wheeler - magnetism" and unpack it all like I had to.

I suppose you're right. The outside must still vary in temperature influencing the temperature of our universe. But excuse me for assuming, are you saying the universe is still cooling off like an oven? At what temperature does that stop?

And what about heat at a standstill? could that have been what Planck was describing in black box radiation that made him crazy?

Empty space has no temperature. We can't measure a temperature of literally nothing. Ergo, when they say "the temperature of our universe" think "the average temperature of all matter" and likely billions of years ago, not now. Zero degrees K is where we believe all cooling (of matter) must end. A perfect "black body" is an abstraction for a perfect absorber. Google it and draw your own conclusions like you always do anyway

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Not going over all that here again. You're welcome to search "Ken Wheeler - magnetism" and unpack it all like I had to.

Empty space has no temperature. We can't measure a temperature of literally nothing. Ergo, when they say "the temperature of our universe" think "the average temperature of all matter" and likely billions of years ago, not now. Zero degrees K is where we believe all cooling (of matter) must end. A perfect "black body" is an abstraction for a perfect absorber. Google it and draw your own conclusions like you always do anyway

I would agree with you that space is never completely empty or else it would have negative infinite temperature.

You yourself said gravity is due to a density in the aether. Could this density be caused by a squeezing of heat from the nucleus?

 

[JoeMoma]

Much of what is discussed in the Science and Tech Forum is way over my head, and I'm more science knowledgeable than "the average bear". That being said, take most everything said her with a grain of salt because the most knowledgeable people on these topics aren't going to be wasting their time posting about them on USMB.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Much of what is discussed in the Science and Tech Forum is way over my head, and I'm more science knowledgeable than "the average bear". That being said, take most everything said her with a grain of salt because the most knowledgeable people on these topics aren't going to be wasting their time posting about them on USMB.

I find that the forums and Quora do a pretty good job of answering obscure questions though.

 

[Grumblenuts]

I would agree with you that space is never completely empty or else it would have negative infinite temperature.

I wouldn't and have no idea where you get "negative infinite temperature" from as if "absolute zero" or -273.15K just weren't low enough for ya or something.

You yourself said gravity is due to a density in the aether. Could this density be caused by a squeezing of heat from the nucleus?

No, I didn't, and no, gravity is caused by the Aether force in general producing a Le Sage effect which we sense as a pull rather than a push. The Aether does build up some around large masses which causes light (not space or time!) to bend around them. Heat is just electromagnetic radiation. As I just said, the cosmic background "radiation" apparently all comes from a short period when 'matter first materialized some 380,000 or so years after the "Bang" (or "Big" energy release from counterspace).' Just because they hate crediting the Aether doesn't mean they're wrong about the math or timing. They just insist upon way overcomplicating everything to substantiate their continued existence, jobs, government funding, book sales, and oversized egos.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Much of what is discussed in the Science and Tech Forum is way over my head, and I'm more science knowledgeable than "the average bear". That being said, take most everything said her with a grain of salt because the most knowledgeable people on these topics aren't going to be wasting their time posting about them on USMB.

Knowledge is one thing, wisdom another, and reason can be exist independent of both. A flock will often select a leader from the eldest and/or most experienced. But having tons of experience watching porn really isn't all that.

 

[JoeMoma]

Knowledge is one thing, wisdom another, and reason can be exist independent of both. A flock will often select a leader from the eldest and/or most experienced. But having tons of experience watching porn really isn't all that.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

I wouldn't and have no idea where you get "negative infinite temperature" from as if "absolute zero" or -273.15K just weren't low enough for ya or something.

No, I didn't, and no, gravity is caused by the Aether force in general producing a Le Sage effect which we sense as a pull rather than a push. The Aether does build up some around large masses which causes light (not space or time!) to bend around them. Heat is just electromagnetic radiation. As I just said, the cosmic background "radiation" apparently all comes from a short period when 'matter first materialized some 380,000 or so years after the "Bang" (or "Big" energy release from counterspace).' Just because they hate crediting the Aether doesn't mean they're wrong about the math or timing. They just insist upon way overcomplicating everything to substantiate their continued existence, jobs, government funding, book sales, and oversized egos.

Could you explain the difference between the density of matter and the density of a wave using your aether knowledge sir?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Thanks for proving my point.

You're welcome
Next time, sharpen your own pencil for a change

Could you explain the difference between the density of matter and the density of a wave using your aether knowledge sir?

No Aether knowledge necessary for that. Electromagnetic waves possess no mass so no density (mass per unit volume). Matter is mass which obviously takes up some amount of space (volume).

I do understand how my loose use "density" in the past to modify "Aether" -- meaning more Aether (field, force, pressure lines) per unit volume -- could have been somewhat confusing.

 

[Innocynioc]

In the part of Alabama where I grew up we learned all of that in sixth grade science.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

In the part of Alabama where I grew up we learned all of that in sixth grade science.

What did you learn?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

loose use "density"

Do you think the word looseuse could be an opposite word to density? But seriously if we are going to continue this conversation we should put on are monkey shit fight helmets. Get ready for it!

 

[trevorjohnson83]

You're welcome
Next time, sharpen your own pencil for a change


No Aether knowledge necessary for that. Electromagnetic waves possess no mass so no density (mass per unit volume). Matter is mass which obviously takes up some amount of space (volume).

I do understand how my loose use "density" in the past to modify "Aether" -- meaning more Aether (field, force, pressure lines) per unit volume -- could have been somewhat confusing.

You've said this before and I can't find a quote to go along with but you believe that magnetic fields cause gravity. Wha? That sounds pretty confusing. Magnetic fields are common with the electrons moving, gravity fields are at a standstill? care to comment?

 

[Grumblenuts]

You've said this before and I can't find a quote to go along with but you believe that magnetic fields cause gravity. Wha? That sounds pretty confusing. Magnetic fields are common with the electrons moving, gravity fields are at a standstill? care to comment?

Sure. You're talking nonsense. Study this..


When you truly understand everything he's talking about get back to me..

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Sure. You're talking nonsense. Study this..


When you truly understand everything he's talking about get back to me..

I think my easy to understand theory on magnets being like fans has much more evidence that is clear and concise. Ain't nobody understanding what all that guys talking about, he seems to be using a madman's vocabulary.