trevorjohnson83
Gold Member
- Nov 24, 2015
- 1,461
- 169
- 138
- Thread starter
- #61
what was your point if any tube?I wouldn't want to cut off your air supply.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what was your point if any tube?I wouldn't want to cut off your air supply.
what was your point if any tube?
You're a tube of science tube, and when people wipe you on their butt, they begin to become really impressed! But seriously WTHey are you saying? It's so clouded with emotion from you being a d***** a 5 star d , that's what I give you is a D and 5 stars.My point is that you only know enough to talk gibberish to people who know nothing at all hoping to impress others about "science."
I meant to say "an electron."Film an election? LOL
The Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor was all the rage at my school even before 1980. I think they're still at it, still promising the Moon in exchange for continued government funding. Anyway, the stumbling block has always been finding a reliable way to contain enough heat to sustain the reaction, mainly through use of electromagnets and plasma. Sorry to inform you that "cold" definitely does not "allow for fusion." There was considerable talk about "cold fusion" for a while, but even that supposedly takes place at room temperature.I would say the further we are from the hot nucleus of the universe, the colder and reactions become so explosive that it allows for fusion.
The cold space a star sits in allows for reactions to be much more energetic. Not saying coldness causes fusion, but it is necessary to accelerate matter to pressures where they collide with enough force to join. If every point in space were hot and dense then matter would have a hard time moving through it as opposed to being cold and less dense.Note,
I meant to say "an electron."
The Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor was all the rage at my school even before 1980. I think they're still at it, still promising the Moon in exchange for continued government funding. Anyway, the stumbling block has always been finding a reliable way to contain enough heat to sustain the reaction, mainly through use of electromagnets and plasma. Sorry to inform you that "cold" definitely does not "allow for fusion." There was considerable talk about "cold fusion" for a while, but even that supposedly takes place at room temperature.
Dr. Nuts, are there any theories you've ever read that suggest a nucleus to the universe? Or is string theory not cover that?I hate winters. Can't get shit done and always bust your knuckles trying anyway.
No and I consider string theory utter nonsense. I subscribe to K.I.S.S. and Occam's Razor theory.Dr. Nuts, are there any theories you've ever read that suggest a nucleus to the universe? Or is string theory not cover that?
Not the early universe. It cooled down quite a lot in the first 100 seconds.The universe cooled down slowly
may have been. may haaave been, but no one knows for sure.Not the early universe. It cooled down quite a lot in the first 100 seconds.
There's tons of evidence that it did.may have been. may haaave been, but no one knows for sure.
There's tons of evidence that it did.![]()
yeah right you turkey.Even more than that--- tons of evidence taken from independent measurements taken by different people at different times and in different ways with differing equipment that all closely agree with and support one-another that the basic premises are sound.