Winco
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2019
- 25,293
- 18,433
- 2,290
When and where did that ^^^^^ happen?yet, you just got challenged and answered with nothing more than, "yes it is"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When and where did that ^^^^^ happen?yet, you just got challenged and answered with nothing more than, "yes it is"
Evidence is great. Law is great as well.
Can you post the law, with a link?
Watch everyone. Another democrat that says it is so that wont link or quote the law.
I do not see any new filings. Go ahead and post the link for us.Sure, you just wait right there.
I imagine you found it already anyway
Focus - FatFuck Bragg charged Trump with falsifying records. What records did he falsify and how did he falsify them? And what was the crime he was allegedly covering up?
It violates nothing and was not required to be listed for the in the indictment.I do not see any new filings. Go ahead and post the link for us.
If it is anything other than the 3 laws I already mentioned, it would violate the judge's order from February. That order was based on the Grand Jury record- no new theories are permitted because the Grand Jury has not seen the evidence.
FOUR MORE YEARS PAUSE
This has been explained to you hundreds of times at this point.Where is the crime??![]()
EACH of those stories was vetted for truthfulness; the doorman was obviously WRONG and the other two highly suspect. It was sensible not to run with them even for a stupid "tabloid" rag. lmaoAt the center of the case is the accusation that Trump took part in a scheme to turn The National Enquirer and its sister publications into an arm of his 2016 presidential campaign. The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending. And, Bragg argued, because Trump created paperwork to make the payments seem like regular legal expenses, that amounted to a criminal effort at a coverup. Trump has denied the charges against him.
BUT HUNTER!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Still no crime quite frankly!!This has been explained to you hundreds of times at this point.
just stop, you are embarrassing yourself.
Couldn't have anything to to do with relieving a crushing burden of debt on our younger generation, could it?Biden has spent $146 billion in taxpayer funds on student loan forgiveness with the goal of helping his election chances.
Uh, you're talking about the Enquirer.EACH of those stories was vetted for truthfulness; the doorman was obviously WRONG and the other two highly suspect. It was sensible not to run with them even for a stupid "tabloid" rag. lmao
Greg
Still no crime quite frankly!!
Greg
Where is the crime??![]()
The crime is fabricated in the weak minds of leftists by the dems and their media allies.
Try 100%You'll find that most of MAGA outrage at the law is them just ignoring evidence and not having a clue about how the law works.
Greg
Oopsie.
Well, this is why, like a mob boss, Trump doesn't like people around him taking notes, using email, or recording anything in any way ever.
Notes are usually pretty good evidence. I guess we'll see.
Try 100%