RadiomanATL
Senior Member
So all you birthers have to do is get someone to order up a copy of their long form birth certificate from Hawaii and prove us wrong.Nope and nope and nope!
§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.
Yeah. Like the COLB that is the only form of birth certificate Hawaii issues now.
(c) Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c 327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1]
There are many different ways to make a certified copy and even different forms can be made.
They even have a price structure posted for different forms and have different names for the different forms based on what legal weight they have applied to them.
Certificates of live birth, certifications of live birth, and even the originaal BC, etc. can be photographed and get a stamp and be a legal document as shown.
"IF" they have his "original BC" on file as Okubo infers it can then be photographed and stamped and then it becomes a legal document!
Unfortunately Okubo is not quoting Hawaiian law when twisting the meaning of "is"
to make it apear that the truth is coming out when in truth it is not especially according to what Hawaiian law states as shown.
Just another example of why Okubo cannot be relied upon as a source in this matter.
'Course not. She's part of the conspiracy doncha know
Are you saying she broke Hawaiian law to verify Barry was born in Hawaii?
I posted the law that said it was illegal for her to do so and the statement that Barry's was being handled like all of the other in the vital statistic files means I could get her to discuss any of the others right just like she did his?
I don't think breaking Hawaiian law bodes well for much veracity on her giving a thumbs up on Barry's authenticity especially as a law breaker she hasn't been crossexamine da s to why she would make a statement that she knows violates Hawaiian law.
Unless court give much weight to the tesimony of people that knowingly break their own document rules and state laws.
If she actually disclosed pertinent information on Barry's BC....
Why isn't she up on charges?