Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is much more precise than 1 or 2 meters. The NYT says it is. They would not lie would they?
Opinion | Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy (Published 2019)
What we learned from the spy in your pocket.www.nytimes.com
I do not give a fuck what you do.Great, then I'll wait for it to be proven.
How in the world do you communicate with that?
Oh. it is. You have always treated the NYT opinions as facts. What happened?That's an opinion piece.
Tired old excuses do nothing to debunk this new evidence. Fail.
Someone has a sad.You cannot. I was just told that the lack of law enforcement action is not due to lack of evidence but that every law enforcement agency in the entire country is complicit on the stealing of the election.
One would have a better argument debating flat earthers than these morons
It is the same technology that allowed the FBI to arrest people at the Capitol days and weeks after Jan. 6th. Their pings placed them at the Capitol and was the reason enough for the arrests. You lose. Game fucking over.There is nothing new, there is just a movie. movies are not evidence, movies are not proof. Movies are made up things
It is the same technology that allowed the FBI to arrest people at the Capitol days and weeks after Jan. 6th. Their pings placed them at the Capitol and was the reason enough for the arrests. You lose. Game fucking over.
The silly ass reasons you losers have for the multiple drop box and non-profits trips are just that. The only plausible explanation is fraud. Do not tell if situations were reversed you would object to the conclusions. Try being honest for a change.
One of the non-profits has already been connected with Stacy Abrams. That was said in the movie by Charlie Kirk. Fact.You can't name a single non-profit supposedly involved. You can't provide even a sliver of evidence that any of those unknown non-profits collected or made up ballots. You can't even begin to show they passed off ballots to these supposed mules whom you can't even prove went to multiple drop boxes.
In a nutshell, you have no proof of anything you're claiming.
The movie explained how it was exactly the same. You lose, dickhead.Yes, it is the same technology, but that does not mean it is being used correctly in your movie. I saw the same technology in a movie on Netflix, does that make the movie on Netflix real?
Oh. it is. You have always treated the NYT opinions as facts. What happened?
It is the same technology that allowed the FBI to arrest people at the Capitol days and weeks after Jan. 6th. Their pings placed them at the Capitol and was the reason enough for the arrests. You lose. Game fucking over.
For the doubters edification, True the Vote will be publishing the names and addresses of the non-profits visited by the mules.
The movie explained how it was exactly the same. You lose, dickhead.
What a childish take. It's a serious movie about election fraud. Go watch cartoons.
OK. Family members. Does it take 30 trips to drop boxes to drop all of your families ballots? You cannot get around the multiple trips that went on for days before the election or discount the same people going to non -profits and back to more drop boxes. Period.
Such lame excuses are laughable.
You only do that with the ones you do not agree with. Your opinion is the one that means nothing.You're lying again, FruitLoops. Unlike you, I can discern an op/Ed from journalism.
Of course I am. He is incredibly corrupt.Then you are claiming that Raffesberger the Republican lied when he said it was investigated and no crimes were committed.
