Have you noticed?

Yes it is. The Gaza Strip has been systematically destroyed. All infrastructure destroyed. Thousands murdered and maimed. All have been displaced.

GENOCIDE!!!!!

You need an education. There is no Palestinian country, there are no Palestinian people, there is no genocide. Palestinian is not a race or a people. Those are Arabs and they are not in danger of being wiped out.
 
If you don't deny the atrocities then why are quoting a slaver at me who used his right to bear arms to keep others in subjugation? You don't think that's kind of a detriment to the point you're trying to make? Which is what? I didn't make you use a tyrant as your rationale. You chose that all on your own.
You obviously don't understand how illogical your stance is. So tell me, what does "Throwing the baby out with the bath water mean"? Or maybe look up Genetic illogical fallacy
 
You need an education. There is no Palestinian country, there are no Palestinian people, there is no genocide. Palestinian is not a race or a people. Those are Arabs and they are not in danger of being wiped out.
And yet even Israelis consider themselves Palestinians.

SHUT OFF THE TV. GET INFORMED!!!!

 
Of course. That however does not mean you throw out all principles that our country was founded on when it comes to understanding the Federal Republic and our system of gov't. Now if you want to have a completely separate topic about the the treating of native americans, and african slave traders selling there own to slave owners here in the states, that's a completely separate topic that some of you don't seem to get. Again, the superior arguments are illogical as some of you throw the baby out with the bath water. Some may also refer to it as the "genetic fallacy". Try and look it up.
Nonsense.
 
Get your one way ticket yet? "Nonsense" that's all you got?
Clearly you don’t know our nation’s founding principles. Look it up. It’s not hard.
 
Clearly you don’t know our nation’s founding principles. Look it up. It’s not hard.
Clearly, you don't understand context and only want to deflect from the point of this discussion, normally called a Red Herring.

Summary:
OP: Have you noticed that not one Trump supporter has called for a ban on guns, or tougher gun restrictions?

Gipper and Jamaican Goat Boy: Our founding fathers were slavers and initiated genocide!! - This is a red herring and genetic fallacy (also throwing the baby out with the bath water). Your arguments hold no water. But here you are, yelling at clouds. Did you get that one way ticket out of the U.S. yet?
 
Clearly, you don't understand context and only want to deflect from the point of this discussion, normally called a Red Herring.

Summary:
OP: Have you noticed that not one Trump supporter has called for a ban on guns, or tougher gun restrictions?

Gipper and Jamaican Goat Boy: Our founding fathers were slavers and initiated genocide!! - This is a red herring and genetic fallacy (also throwing the baby out with the bath water). Your arguments hold no water. But here you are, yelling at clouds. Did you get that one way ticket out of the U.S. yet?
You doing your hilarious cosplay interpretation of our argument isn't the same thing as you being able to address our actual arguments, like a real proud boy. :itsok: :laugh:
 
My eyes, are not the issue. My brain is able to take facts and understand them. The fact is that there is no genocide.
Obviously you’re demented like Genocide Joe.

No thinking person supports genocide.
 
President Trump was shot at in an attempted assassination. I have even heard that the gunman used an "AR type" weap[on, whatever that means.

Have you noticed that not one Trump supporter has called for a ban on guns, or tougher gun restrictions?

Why, well three reasons.
So, he gives four! :rolleyes-41:

#NUFFSAID
 
You need an education. There is no Palestinian country, there are no Palestinian people, there is no genocide. Palestinian is not a race or a people. Those are Arabs and they are not in danger of being wiped out.
Step one to justifying ethnic cleansing is to take away their identity.
 
You doing your hilarious cosplay interpretation of our argument isn't the same thing as you being able to address our actual arguments, like a real proud boy. :itsok: :laugh:
Your arguments are off topic from the intent of the original post. I've stated that, you're clearly deflecting and throwing out red herrings, which in any formal debate/discussion, is... well... tossed out. You lose.
 
You obviously don't understand how illogical your stance is. So tell me, what does "Throwing the baby out with the bath water mean"? Or maybe look up Genetic illogical fallacy
Throwing the baby out with the bath water is a specific fallacy, namely the false analogy fallacy. In that analogy the baby is something to be protected. I'm challenging that very notion. The second amendment should be done away with because it's bad law and its rationale doesn't stand to scrutiny. It's bad law because it's original purpose was to arm gangs of white men so they could put down the attempts of their slaves to resist their subjugation. This also reveals how shoddy the rationale is. Rather than protecting against tyranny for much of this country's existence it has instead helped enforce tyranny and black Americans didn't eventually win their fight against tyranny with violent arms, they did so through peaceful dignity and allowing the indecency of white society to be laid bare and shame them into being better. Changing hearts and minds ends tyranny. Violence just perpetuates it.
 
Your arguments are off topic from the intent of the original post. I've stated that, you're clearly deflecting and throwing out red herrings, which in any formal debate/discussion, is... well... tossed out. You lose.
No, that's not clear at all. You have to show that, not simply allude to it Struggle Bus. The OP was about constitutional rights which is what I'm addressing.
 
Throwing the baby out with the bath water is a specific fallacy, namely the false analogy fallacy. In that analogy the baby is something to be protected. I'm challenging that very notion. The second amendment should be done away with because it's bad law and its rationale doesn't stand to scrutiny. It's bad law because it's original purpose was to arm gangs of white men so they could put down the attempts of their slaves to resist their subjugation.
Intent and usage are different. The usage of militias against slaves, is wrong. But that is not the intent. That's what you're hinging your argument on.
This also reveals how shoddy the rationale is. Rather than protecting against tyranny for much of this country's existence it has instead helped enforce tyranny and black Americans didn't eventually win their fight against tyranny with violent arms, they did so through peaceful dignity and allowing the indecency of white society to be laid bare and shame them into being better. Changing hearts and minds ends tyranny. Violence just perpetuates it.
Your not wrong in principal.

However, your throwing the baby out with the bath water, and you can't see that. The 2A should be protected as it allows citizens, if needed, the capacity to protect our freedoms and liberties from tyranny. The misuse of militias is the water, the 2A is the baby.
You can't see that?
 
Intent and usage are different. The usage of militias against slaves, is wrong. But that is not the intent. That's what you're hinging your argument on.
Is not who's intent? It was the intent of the slavers who you quoted to me.
Your not wrong in principal.

However, your throwing the baby out with the bath water, and you can't see that. The 2A should be protected as it allows citizens, if needed, the capacity to protect our freedoms and liberties from tyranny. The misuse of militias is the water, the 2A is the baby.
You can't see that?
What I'm doing and what you seem to be failing to understand is that I'm challenging your premise, namely that the second amendment is necessary, let alone can be used to end tyranny by showing you historically that it was used to promote tyranny, not end it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom