Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[schmidlap]

They should be studying the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record. Computer models are not evidence. Especially flawed ones that produce feedback 4 times greater than the instantaneous effect itself.

Your advice to climatologists - who already study their data concerning the geologic record of climate - is noted.

​

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s Summary for Policymakers reads: “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land.” ​

​

The report, which was approved by 195 national governments, shows the rapid human-induced change that is occurring in our climate. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is the highest it has been in 2 million years...​

Faster, more intense, with more devastating impacts: New IPCC report lays out the scientific basis of the climate emergency – CityTalk

talkofthecities.iclei.org

​

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^

All this science invalid parrot can do is parrot....

 

[schmidlap]

^^^^^^

All this science invalid parrot can do is parrot....

Science-deniers do not like people being informed about science.

Scientific knowledge is the enemy of MAGAdogma.

The Trump administration on Monday took another step to make it harder to find major, legally mandated scientific assessments of how climate change is endangering the nation and its people.​

​

Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative, peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it...​

​

“This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly,” said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments...​

MSN

www.msn.com

​

MAGAdogmatists are unable to refute the science, so they must suppress it.

Trump administration shuts down U.S. website on climate change​

 

[westwall]

Your advice to climatologists - who already study their data concerning the geologic record of climate - is noted.

​

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s Summary for Policymakers reads: “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land.” ​

​

The report, which was approved by 195 national governments, shows the rapid human-induced change that is occurring in our climate. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is the highest it has been in 2 million years...​

Faster, more intense, with more devastating impacts: New IPCC report lays out the scientific basis of the climate emergency – CityTalk

talkofthecities.iclei.org

​

All of which doesn't matter. CO2 concentrations have been much higher than the present day and there were no high temperatures.

CO2 atmospheric increases are a byproduct of global warming.

Not a cause.

 

[Mashmont]

The consensus among the world’s climatologists, scientists in general, national and local governments, and savvy folks everywhere is that humans cannot endlessness poop into the heavens with impunity. The consequences are predictable, and are already exacting a hefty toll.

Nation's top climate science assessments removed from federal websites​

Trump… seeks to shut down the laboratory atop a peak in Hawaii where scientists have gathered the most conclusive evidence of human-caused climate change since the 1950s.​

​

The Mauna Loa laboratory in Hawaii has measured atmospheric carbon dioxide, which — along with other planet-warming pollution — has led directly to climate change, driving sea level rise, supercharging weather and destroying food systems.​

​

Trump’s budget proposal would also defund many other climate labs, including instrument sites comprising the US government’s greenhouse gas monitoring network, which stretches from northern Alaska to the South Pole.​

​

But it’s the Mauna Loa laboratory that is the most prominent target of Trump’s climate ire, as measurements that began there in 1958 have steadily shown CO2’s upward march as human activities have emitted more and more of the planet-warming gas each year.​

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-admin-tries-to-kill-the-most-indisputable-evidence-of-human-caused-climate-change-by-shuttering-observatory/ar-AA1HLdjJ?ocid=BingNewsVerp​

View attachment 1131455
​

Trump, monumentally ignorant concerning climatology, has been spewing his baseless crap for many years, and has presented no scientific evidence to support his ludicrous dogma:

View attachment 1131458
"The concept of global warming was created by and for the
Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.”

View attachment 1131453
"This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop.
Our planet is freezing, record low temps,and our GW scientists are stuck in ice.”

View attachment 1131454
“It's a hoax. I mean, it's a money-making industry, OK?”


The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial
View attachment 1131456

Climate change will cost about $38 trillion a year by 2049.​

"Climate change will cost about $38 trillion a year by 2049." The leftwing predictions haven't been correct in the short term, so why would we hand over trillions to the same folks making long range predictions?

 

[HikerGuy83]

Science-deniers do not like people being informed about science.

Your sentence makes no sense given the lack of definition around your terms.

It's amazing you somehow think this is "logic" when in reality it really is mental laziness.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Your advice to climatologists - who already study their data concerning the geologic record of climate - is noted.

​

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s Summary for Policymakers reads: “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land.” ​

​

The report, which was approved by 195 national governments, shows the rapid human-induced change that is occurring in our climate. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is the highest it has been in 2 million years...​

Faster, more intense, with more devastating impacts: New IPCC report lays out the scientific basis of the climate emergency – CityTalk

talkofthecities.iclei.org

​

Yeah...nobody is looking for a reason to ask the U.S. for more dollars.

What a joke.

 

[ding]

Your advice to climatologists - who already study their data concerning the geologic record of climate - is noted.

​

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s Summary for Policymakers reads: “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land.” ​

​

The report, which was approved by 195 national governments, shows the rapid human-induced change that is occurring in our climate. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is the highest it has been in 2 million years...​

Faster, more intense, with more devastating impacts: New IPCC report lays out the scientific basis of the climate emergency – CityTalk

talkofthecities.iclei.org

​

They haven’t presented their study and conclusions from the geologic record because they haven’t studied it.

 

[schmidlap]

All of which doesn't matter. CO2 concentrations have been much higher than the present day and there were no high temperatures.

CO2 atmospheric increases are a byproduct of global warming.

Not a cause.

Your belief that you know more about climate than the world's climatologists is amusing.

MAGAdogma conquers all.

 

[schmidlap]

They haven’t presented their study and conclusions from the geologic record because they haven’t studied it.

Why do you believe that the world's climatologists are all ignorant concerning paleo-climate and its import whilst MAGAdogmatists are privy to such data?

Paleoclimatology data are derived from natural sources such as tree rings, ice cores, corals, stalagmites, and ocean and lake sediments. These proxy climate data extend the weather and climate information archive by hundreds to millions of years. The data include geophysical or biological measurement time series and some reconstructed climate variables such as temperature and precipitation. Scientists use paleoclimatology data and information to understand natural climate variability and future climate change.​

 

[schmidlap]

Yeah...nobody is looking for a reason to ask the U.S. for more dollars.

What a joke.

If you wish to believe that the dirty fuel lobby is selfless, MAGAdogmatism is clearly your substitute for climate science.

 

[ding]

Why do you believe that the world's climatologists are all ignorant concerning paleo-climate and its import whilst MAGAdogmatists are privy to such data?

Paleoclimatology data are derived from natural sources such as tree rings, ice cores, corals, stalagmites, and ocean and lake sediments. These proxy climate data extend the weather and climate information archive by hundreds to millions of years. The data include geophysical or biological measurement time series and some reconstructed climate variables such as temperature and precipitation. Scientists use paleoclimatology data and information to understand natural climate variability and future climate change.​

Mostly bias but some incompetence and fraud as well though.

Not to worry though because when the AMOC collapses it will all come out as they point fingers at each other.

 

[schmidlap]

Mostly bias but some incompetence and fraud as well though.

Not to worry though because when the AMOC collapses it will all come out as they point fingers at each other.

Science be damned, MAGA love of the dirty fuel cartel is priceless.

 

[ding]

Science be damned, MAGA love of the dirty fuel cartel is priceless.

I think I’ll go with empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.

 

[schmidlap]

I think I’ll go with empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.

Yes, the world's climatologists who compiled that data obviously take it into account in reaching their consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

Of course, MAGAdogma is not impacted by science.

 

[ding]

Yes, the world's climatologists who compiled that data obviously take it into account in reaching their consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

Of course, MAGAdogma is not impacted by science.

You are a political ideologue. You know nothing about science. You only believe what you are told to believe.

 

[EMH]

Science-deniers do not like people being informed about science.

Scientific knowledge is the enemy of MAGAdogma.

The Trump administration on Monday took another step to make it harder to find major, legally mandated scientific assessments of how climate change is endangering the nation and its people.​

​

Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative, peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it...​

​

“This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly,” said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments...​

MSN

www.msn.com

​

MAGAdogmatists are unable to refute the science, so they must suppress it.

Trump administration shuts down U.S. website on climate change​

PARROT goes BAWK

Schmidlap is parroting the climatologists.
Schmidlap cannot answer basic climate questions.
Schmidlap cannot respond to actual data refuting the CO2 FRAUD and hence the climatologists.

Schmidlap will respond with parroting the climatologists...

BAWK...

• 
  
• 
  

 

[EMH]

compiled that data

FUDGED that data, already documented...

 

[westwall]

Your belief that you know more about climate than the world's climatologists is amusing.

MAGAdogma conquers all.

What I know is I am qualified to teach any climatology class there is. Climatologists, on the other hand, can safely teach up to undergrad level in my field.

After that though...they aren't capable of teaching graduate level geology classes.

Nice try there skippy, but as usual, you fail.

 

[HikerGuy83]

If you wish to believe that the dirty fuel lobby is selfless, MAGAdogmatism is clearly your substitute for climate science.

Funny....I never said I believe that.

Strange....how you constantly make stuff up to argue against.

I am more of a scientist than you'll ever hope to be.