bendog
Diamond Member
Assuming he loses, I wonder if his vote total will be smaller and if so how much. I'm also curious about how many will vote overall
Has The Curtain Finally Been Pulled Back On Candidate Trump?
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,370
- 2,140
PROGS rip it down then complain about it. It's how they were raised
Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
First, I would say that Tax Cuts do not lead to deficits. SPENDING leads to deficits. That includes unnecessary MILITARY spending. If there was ZERO spending, we would have a $3 Trillion surplus WITH the tax cuts. If you want to complain about the order of operations, fine, but if we are NEVER going to stop spending, fuck them. Give us the fucking tax cuts.
The main thing Trump accomplished was what he didn't do. He didn't continue the march toward government takeover of all industry.
I did not agree with his protectionist policies, but I STRONGLY SUPPORTED his efforts to get the rest of the world's hands out of our pockets. Even if it didn't work, at least he is doing SOMETHING other than doubling down on American Ass Rape.
If you ask yourself who will be better for America on the global trade issue, and you say "Biden" then you are very much in denial.
As for guns, most Americans do not mind background checks (even if I do). Most Americans also do not support further limitations on what law abiding citizens can purchase. I would bet most Americans do not want to expand what we already have either. They want the status quo. If I don't push for machine guns, the status quo will not hold. Get my drift? Leave well enough alone on what we can purchase right now. Anything more, and I am going to push for belt-fed machine guns legally carried by felons in every school and courthouse in America. Don't push it further. Be pleased with what you have now.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
The child in the White House tweets this out, then wonders why seniors are leaving him:
www.politico.com
Why Senior Citizens Are Flipping on Trump
If polls hold, Joe Biden will be the first Democratic presidential nominee in 20 years to win a majority of senior citizens. Nora Super, a researcher on the politics of aging, explains why.
www.politico.com
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
Well the tax cuts hurt revenue growth and trump drastically increased military spending. The combination gave us a trillion dollar deficit last year. This year will be over $3 trillion.
I think we really disagree on trade. I think it’s great China has been sending us their resources for next to nothing. Getting stuff cheap is the point of trade. Tariffs are the government trying to influence industry so I’d say he did increase government.
For me the country was just so much better 4 years ago. I look around and see huge deficits, giant bailouts, riots, increasing crime, recession, most pandemic deaths . Repubs just offering excuses. I really don’t think trump figured out he is president of the whole USA, not just republican areas.
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
He always makes fun of short people too. There are lots of reasons not to vote for him...The child in the White House tweets this out, then wonders why seniors are leaving him:
Why Senior Citizens Are Flipping on Trump
If polls hold, Joe Biden will be the first Democratic presidential nominee in 20 years to win a majority of senior citizens. Nora Super, a researcher on the politics of aging, explains why.
WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,370
- 2,140
Know how folks know you're a PROG without reading your material?
It's because you sport a brain for an avatar, and PROGS consistently describe themselves with antonyms.
Everything you said here supports that. Change your avatar to Stain for more appropriate.
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
I’m a fiscally responsible free market capitalist. Is that PROG now? It sure isn’t Trump.
bendog
Diamond Member
Assuming he gets elected, I think Biden may surprise on trade. But then I don't think the EU was truly assraping us. GM and Ford just don't build cars that compete with BMW and Mercedes. Leaving out car engines and parts assembled here, there wasn't that much an imbalance. Not that I'd want either of those.
And Lexus is imo superior to both. And for the life us, we can't build as good a small suv as Honda.
Jina is a true predator, and it has no interest in participatory democracy.
I'm not doing cartwheels here, though. But the bar is soooooo low. Maybe not so low as Buchanan, but Lincoln started a war that should have lasted weeks, but lingered for 4 years and at a casualty rate that would have left 10 million casualties plus today. And even then he's rates as the GOAT! JFC, if Biden can just stay upright for 4 years, he'll punk Trump's enomouslyfatass! (-:
WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,370
- 2,140
Hah, you're PROG. I only read your first two sentences, PROG through & through
Last edited:
bendog
Diamond Member
You managed TWO sentences? I doubt this.
Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.
You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.
But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.
Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .
Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message
What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?www.npr.org
Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.
Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?
Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?
Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.
Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.
The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.
And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.
You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.
You don't care that it won't be mandatory, people will like it and therefore it's bad.
Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.
Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.
What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!
Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.
.
So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.
Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.
.
You mean other than the author of it admitted it?
.
Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.
.
I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?
It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.
Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?
.
The Big Bang model is supported by evidence
What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)
The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.www.space.com
Unlike “intelligent design”
Still laughing, the op-ed dude said the universe was once the size of a peach, yet he never even speculated where the peach came form. How about you tell me, where did the tiny ball of densely packed matter come from?
And I thank you for the video, it was great for several belly laughs. That dude is a fucking idiot.
.
The previous article explained the evidence for the model. You can dismiss science all you want, flat earthier.
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
Well Trump is neither fiscally responsible or a free market capitalist.
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,121
- 2,220
- Banned
- #154
God gives great battles to great warriors. It’s one more war that you will win, President Trump!
- Moderator
- #155
Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.
You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.
But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.
Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .
Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message
What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?
Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.
Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?
Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?
Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.
Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.
The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.
And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.
You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.
Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.
Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.
What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!
Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.
.
So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.
Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.
.
You mean other than the author of it admitted it?
.
Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.
.
I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?
It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.
Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?
.
The Big Bang model is supported by evidence
What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)
The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.
Unlike “intelligent design”
Still laughing, the op-ed dude said the universe was once the size of a peach, yet he never even speculated where the peach came form. How about you tell me, where did the tiny ball of densely packed matter come from?
And I thank you for the video, it was great for several belly laughs. That dude is a fucking idiot.
.
The previous article explained the evidence for the model. You can dismiss science all you want, flat earthier.
No it didn't, it explained the evidence of the expansion of the universe, it dodged the question of the origin of the universe, like you just did.
.
Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.
Rubbish.
In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.
Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts
The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.thebulwark.com
After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.
Even if Trump were to lose, he just beat Hillary and spent four years as President after having no political experience. Then he did more than Clinton, W and Obama did in 24. And more than Biden did in 47. That you think that isn't a win is of course the useless partisan hack you are
Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.
You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.
But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.
Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .
Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message
What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?
Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.
Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?
Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?
Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.
Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.
The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.
And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.
You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.
Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.
Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.
What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!
Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.
.
So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.
Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.
.
You mean other than the author of it admitted it?
.
Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.
.
I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?
It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.
Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?
.
The Big Bang model is supported by evidence
What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)
The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.
Unlike “intelligent design”
Still laughing, the op-ed dude said the universe was once the size of a peach, yet he never even speculated where the peach came form. How about you tell me, where did the tiny ball of densely packed matter come from?
And I thank you for the video, it was great for several belly laughs. That dude is a fucking idiot.
.
The previous article explained the evidence for the model. You can dismiss science all you want, flat earthier.
No it didn't, it explained the evidence of the expansion of the universe, it dodged the question of the origin of the universe, like you just did.
.
The Big Bang is a model to explain the origins of the universe. It is supported by evidence, unlike “intelligent design” which is supported by fairy dust and faith. You have gone beyond ridiculous in opposing teaching about slavery while embracing schools teaching actual fairytales.
Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Oh, he’s done more all right. He’s been more corrupt, he’s been a bigger danger to national security, and his incompetence has probably killed more Americans. Winning!!!Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.
Rubbish.
In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.
Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts
The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.
After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.
Even if Trump were to lose, he just beat Hillary and spent four years as President after having no political experience. Then he did more than Clinton, W and Obama did in 24. And more than Biden did in 47. That you think that isn't a win is of course the useless partisan hack you are
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
More? Like biggest deficits and bailouts? More crime and riots? More pandemic deaths?Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.
Rubbish.
In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.
Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts
The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.
After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.
Even if Trump were to lose, he just beat Hillary and spent four years as President after having no political experience. Then he did more than Clinton, W and Obama did in 24. And more than Biden did in 47. That you think that isn't a win is of course the useless partisan hack you are
Clinton was way better. Balanced the budget with a stronger economy. Welfare reform. Crime went way down...
- Moderator
- #160
Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.
You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.
But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.
Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .
Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message
What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?
Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.
Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?
Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?
Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.
Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.
The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.
And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.
You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.
Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.
Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.
What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!
Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.
.
So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.
Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.
.
You mean other than the author of it admitted it?
.
Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.
.
I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?
It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.
Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?
.
The Big Bang model is supported by evidence
What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)
The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.
Unlike “intelligent design”
Still laughing, the op-ed dude said the universe was once the size of a peach, yet he never even speculated where the peach came form. How about you tell me, where did the tiny ball of densely packed matter come from?
And I thank you for the video, it was great for several belly laughs. That dude is a fucking idiot.
.
The previous article explained the evidence for the model. You can dismiss science all you want, flat earthier.
No it didn't, it explained the evidence of the expansion of the universe, it dodged the question of the origin of the universe, like you just did.
.
The Big Bang is a model to explain the origins of the universe. It is supported by evidence, unlike “intelligent design” which is supported by fairy dust and faith. You have gone beyond ridiculous in opposing teaching about slavery while embracing schools teaching actual fairytales.
You're really a pathetic liar.
.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
White People MUST PAY??? She Wants YOUR House, YOUR Money – And Says It's Your Fault- Started by YoursTruly
- Replies: 9
-
-
Core Inflation Falls to Lowest Rate in Four Years - Wage Growth Outpaces Inflation- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 6
-
-
