Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

CIA Director Brennan and the IC misled lawmakers by referencing the debunked Steele Dossier to assess “Russian plans and intentions,” which falsely suggested the dossier had intelligence value.
And yet correctly found that Russia helped trump.and that the Trump campaign staff had a mountain of ties to various Russian spies and gangsters.
 
the due process played out, and in the end, resulted on all of it being overturned on a technicality that the Supreme Court invented on the spot. he could have been retried on several of the charges and would have been convicted.. It's just true. I know you REALLY wanted some of my attention, but you don't have to make up lies to get it, shmoopy.
Absolutely false. You don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about.

It’s either that or you just can’t stop being a lying little rodent

And you have strange belief in your own adequacy. Newsflash: it doesn’t exist. You’re just a flatulent troll.
 
CIA Director Brennan and the IC misled lawmakers by referencing the debunked Steele Dossier to assess “Russian plans and intentions,” which falsely suggested the dossier had intelligence value.
I don't really care what you think it "suggested" because it says very clear in black and white that it was not used to inform their analysis.
 
Absolutely false. You don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about.

It’s either that or you just can’t stop being a lying little rodent

And you have strange belief in your own adequacy. Newsflash: it doesn’t exist. You’re just a flatulent troll.
Yep, went through due process. To the Supreme Court, even. And they ruled that the instructions given to the jury about what constitutes an official act were too broad.

And that's it. That's all. The DOJ could have brought charges again, but decided not to do so.

No idea what you're trying to make hay about tonight, but I can guarantee it is neither important nor germane.
 
A weak one, and often insufficient if the prosecutor is particularly unscrupulous.
That is not what Democrats and "not Democrats" said when the New York grand jury indicted Trump.

Y'all said all that suff about "no innocent person . . . "
 
That is not what Democrats and "not Democrats" said when the New York grand jury indicted Trump.

Y'all said all that suff about "no innocent person . . . "
i don’t recall seeing that. I’d say a jury trial is protection.
 
I think Moroner is actually that Rachel Madcow dude from MSNBC. Every post by that idiot could be word for word out of Madcow.
 
15th post
Oh, well then they shall have it!

Fear not!
I do. Everyone should fear a highly politicized and weaponized system of justice.

Impartial justice typically sets functioning democracies apart from authoritarian illiberal countries.
 
Is it a felony if it’s in a Signal Chat?
It's not a felony for her, given no intent, just as Pence and Biden were not charged.

Cooperation matters. That's why Trump DID get in trouble: He lied to the investigators and to the court. And he refused to return the things he illegally took. We teach 4 year olds that this is "stealing". Still, to this day, they have not recovered all of the classified materials.
 
I’ve yet to understand what crime is being investigated.
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has opened an investigation into Jack Smith and is examining whether Smith violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official authority for political purposes.

 
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has opened an investigation into Jack Smith and is examining whether Smith violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official authority for political purposes.

Yes, theater for gullible people. Expensive theater. Hey, we can look at it as Trump creating jobs, I guess. 'Bout time he did.
 
Back
Top Bottom