Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

This investigation has been underway for months. It got to the point that it was decided to release doc's associated with the investigation.... criminal referrals probably preceeded release of the doc's.

lol.....but you do.


Who's said that?
I think it’s telling that your belief in this scandal requires belief in unseen evidence.
 
Not opinion - simply fact. Third and last time, neither you nor I know what evidence the DOJ is presenting to the GJ. Your presumptuousness regarding this evidence is 100% partisan wishful thinking.
It is your opinion that Gabbard’s claims offer no insight to what Bondi is investigating.

I disagree.

I believe you have this opinion because Gabbard’s claims are not sustainable based on the evidence presented despite the claims otherwise.
 
Neither here nor there......it will be up to a GJ to decide.

Why's everyone lawyering up?
If I thought a political DoJ run by a man with a serious vendetta and lack of adherence to the law was coming after me, I’d lawyer up. It’s the logical thing to do.
 
Well, I doubt Mueller will be showing up to Congress for his subpoena.
 
It is your opinion that Gabbard’s claims offer no insight to what Bondi is investigating.

I disagree.

I believe you have this opinion because Gabbard’s claims are not sustainable based on the evidence presented despite the claims otherwise.
I have not offered any opinion on Ms. Gabbard's claims.
 
I have not offered any opinion on Ms. Gabbard's claims.
I think you’re playing silly semantic games rather than engaging in a honest conversation.

Have a blessed day, douchebag.
 
Are you sure? I believe the Durham report comments on the nature from this meeting including reviewing the notes.

Gabbard is saying things about treason and a coup. I don’t think that helps her credibility
Well I think it doesn't help traitors. 😐
 
Well I think it doesn't help traitors. 😐
You know what does help traitors? Having their indictments withdrawn because a sitting prez can't be prosecuted.
 
Of course there’s reason. This investigation is being managed by the Trump DoJ and we have reason to believe their department is infused with politics. Trump has a personal vendetta.

The investigation itself is inexplicable.

Please tell us how the investigation and prosecution of a crime is a vendetta. It is simply an investigation and prosecution of a crime. Do the crime, do the time.

What is the old liberal saying we heard a million + times the last several years

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
 
Please tell us how the investigation and prosecution of a crime is a vendetta. It is simply an investigation and prosecution of a crime. Do the crime, do the time.

What is the old liberal saying we heard a million + times the last several years

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
I’ve yet to understand what crime is being investigated.
 
15th post
Depends on the extent of the corruption in the DoJ and courts.
"God, he (Trump), is a loathsome, human being." "Hillary should win by a hundred million to zero." "I was in walmart, and I could smell the Trump support."

Do you know where those quotes come from?

From official texts by the senior FBI administrator in charge of the investigation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

So keep crying! I'll mix your tears with my bourbon.
 
Somewhere around here somebody quoted the US code for several possible 'outcomes'.
I haven’t seen it.

Saying it’s a coup or treason makes absolutely no sense.

Someone said lying to Congress. Even if you could prove something, which is doubtful, statute of limitations is 5 years. Long time passed.

Someone said election interference which isn’t really a thing for people who live in this country and also doesn’t make sense since the supposed offense is after the election.
 
Saying it’s a coup or treason makes absolutely no sense.
Heard 'seditious conspiracy'. Sealyboohoo was going on about that.

Someone said lying to Congress.
Clapper, Brennan and Comey are on record and recent revelations in the doc's prove otherwise.
Even if you could prove something, which is doubtful, statute of limitations is 5 years. Long time passed.

Brennan, Comey and HRC testified in 2020. From what i read, it doesn't jibe with the recent revelations.
 
Back
Top Bottom