H2O vs. CO2 Yet another observation the AGW Cult will ignore

Yeah, scientists are so stupid. They cannot notice that rain and snow prove that H2O must be in the atmosphere.

They cannot possibly figure out that putting more CO2 into the atmosphere that does not precipitate out will increase the amount of H2O in the atmosphere that evaporates and eventually precipitates out to repeat the cycle.

Stupid Scientists!
 
Water vapor is a more powerful GHG that CO2. H2O is Mike Tyson and CO2 is Woody Allen

The "theory" of Manmade Global Climate Warming Change is that the relatively recent CO2 increase from 280 to 420PPM will cause an extinction level event rivaled by the dinosaur killing asteroid. "

But..."Water vapor is Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas. It’s responsible for about half of Earth’s greenhouse effect — the process that occurs when gases in Earth’s atmosphere trap the Sun’s heat." Steamy Relationships: How Atmospheric Water Vapor Amplifies Earth's Greenhouse Effect – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

If H2O is more powerful where are the studies showing H2O back in 1850? What are they today? Does an additional 100PPM H2O raise temperature more that CO2
Frank, we can actually track H2O like temperature by registering humidity! And can you fking believe it tracks those most uncomfortable days of the year? Temperature humidity readings. Now myself ask, where’s the temperature CO2 reading for those uncomfortable days?

And will you believe one doesn’t exist?

Then I laugh like you
 
Water vapor is a more powerful GHG that CO2. H2O is Mike Tyson and CO2 is Woody Allen

The "theory" of Manmade Global Climate Warming Change is that the relatively recent CO2 increase from 280 to 420PPM will cause an extinction level event rivaled by the dinosaur killing asteroid. "

But..."Water vapor is Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas. It’s responsible for about half of Earth’s greenhouse effect — the process that occurs when gases in Earth’s atmosphere trap the Sun’s heat." Steamy Relationships: How Atmospheric Water Vapor Amplifies Earth's Greenhouse Effect – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

If H2O is more powerful where are the studies showing H2O back in 1850? What are they today? Does an additional 100PPM H2O raise temperature more that CO2
A pretty silly argument. Increased CO2 causes a rise in water vapor. Are you really that delusional that You have to disagree with EVERY climate research facility in the world,.
Increased CO2 causes a rise in temp which causes an increase in, guess what ?
 
A pretty silly argument. Increased CO2 causes a rise in water vapor. Are you really that delusional that You have to disagree with EVERY climate research facility in the world,.

Can ANY ONE of these imaginary "climate research facilities" provides us with the relationship between CO2 and temperature controlling for CO2? What? No?! They only have models and no experiments showing the relations between temperature and CO2 varying between 280 and 400PPM?

How sad!

How anti-science

Are you a Cult?
 
Can ANY ONE of these imaginary "climate research facilities" provides us with the relationship between CO2 and temperature controlling for CO2? What? No?! They only have models and no experiments showing the relations between temperature and CO2 varying between 280 and 400PPM?

How sad!

How anti-science

Are you a Cult?
Imaginary ? Before you make anymore stupid remarks…
here is a list.

Btw, all govt related agencies, related corporations throughout the world, officially think your views are FOS.

You’re welcome to address your silly little assertions to any of them.
 
Last edited:
But you didn't answer the question!!
Why should I ? Your problem isn’t with my answer, it’s with you stupidly thinking you know more then literally, EVERYONE OF THESE AGENCIES, institutions and govts . Geesus, why should I post the same answer from Everyone of them. Do you need help ? Or, are you just trolling and blowing smoke ?
 
A pretty silly argument. Increased CO2 causes a rise in water vapor. Are you really that delusional that You have to disagree with EVERY climate research facility in the world,.
Increased CO2 causes a rise in temp which causes an increase in, guess what ?
How much rise in water vapor per 10 ppm?
 
Why should I ? Your problem isn’t with my answer, it’s with you stupidly thinking you know more then literally, EVERYONE OF THESE AGENCIES, institutions and govts . Geesus, why should I post the same answer from Everyone of them. Do you need help ? Or, are you just trolling and blowing smoke ?
Are you curious why you can’t answer the question??
 
Can ANY ONE of these imaginary "climate research facilities" provides us with the relationship between CO2 and temperature controlling for CO2? What? No?! They only have models and no experiments showing the relations between temperature and CO2 varying between 280 and 400PPM?

How sad!

How anti-science

Are you a Cult?
Ever heard of Global Dimming?

When we burn stuff not just CO2 is created. Our industry puts aerosols into the air. These aerosols interact with H20 in the atmosphere making clouds more reflective. There was a BBC Horizon episode about this that aired in 2005. This has an opposite effect of increasing CO2. This effect is why some people are proposing putting chemicals high in the atmosphere.

We are doing too many different things simultaneously that have side effects that we cannot predict.
 
How much rise in water vapor per 10 ppm?
This is why you don’t even deserve a seat at the table.
This is why it’s silly to get into debates with science illiterates and why you need to go to the web sites of each and get a whole lot more background.

Of course, your questions omits the ambient temperature
, atmospheric pressure and the presents of o2 and other gasses, nitrogen being the most abundant which has a different effect. Really, web sites will have pictures…..you need that kind of help.
 
Last edited:
This is why you don’t even deserve a seat at the table.
This is why it’s silly to get into debates with science illiterates and why you need to go to the web sites of each and get a whole lot more background.

Of course, your questions omits the ambient temperature
, atmospheric pressure and the presents of o2 and other gasses, nitrogen being the most abundant which has a different effect. Really, web sites will have pictures…..you need that kind of help.
So nothing huh? Go fking figure
 
So nothing huh? Go fking figure
Learn to ask a question correctly or not at all. You actually think there is a direct variation between CO2 and water vapor when there are other green house and inert gases and within varying temp ranges ? You’re hilarious. It’s called a combined variation in math and to omit other factors means one thing, you are Dumb….and unqualified like ALL DENIERS.
Go fking figure. This is simple HS shit you don’t even have to be a college grad to get…..you flunked.
 
Can't they just cause it to rain? They claim humans can change global climate. Just make it rain enough to ease climate change. :cool:
 
Can't they just cause it to rain? They claim humans can change global climate. Just make it rain enough to ease climate change. :D
Maybe we can use one of Trumps ideas and nuke the atmosphere. Go ahead. See what MIT or NASA says about the idea.
 
Learn to ask a question correctly or not at all. You actually think there is a direct variation between CO2 and water vapor when there are other green house and inert gases and within varying temp ranges ? You’re hilarious. It’s called a combined variation in math and to omit other factors means one thing, you are Dumb….and unqualified like ALL DENIERS.
Go fking figure. This is simple HS shit you don’t even have to be a college grad to get…..you flunked.
Whoa, so you lied?
 
Can't they just cause it to rain? They claim humans can change global climate. Just make it rain enough to ease climate change. :cool:
Yep, end all desert regions. Melt the ice in the Arctic water so we can waterski
 
How is this "Science" if they can't answer the simple bedrock, fundamental question that forms the base of their "Theory"?

Q. How much does temperature increase when CO2 is increased from 280 to 400PPM?

A. Close to zero, maybe .001F
 

Forum List

Back
Top