Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey....moron......there are millions of veterans who suffer from some form of PTSD, especially after our long fight against muslim terrorists....and those millions are not murdering other people....
Your post is exactly why we can't let you set up the rules for mental health background checks...all of our veterans would lose their 2nd Amendment Rights......
How about the right of VA Staffers to not be shot by a crazy person when they are having an office party? Or did the Founding Slave Rapists not think of that one?
Yet Bush signed the first law and they changed it, it still means it had bipartisan support....And your point is as salient as a myopic dog...Recognize the facts if you want any damn respect from me....It's not and never has been a partisan issue till 2018....And the Goddamned pigs are armed that are assigned to schools so technically they have someone there to help protect....But it doesn't do any good to have arms if those with the arms are cowards....Pretty sad when a teen can outmaneuver a bunch of old fucks that can't do their jobs....You want retirees and mental patients to all be armed? Yeah that's a catastrophe waiting to happen...`
A decorated Army veteran with a high-powered rifle returned to the Veterans Home of California in Yountville, where he had recently been kicked out of a program for treatment of combat stress, and killed three mental health workers Friday, officials said.
He and the victims were found dead about 8 hours after he exchanged gunfire with a Napa County sheriff’s deputy, officials said.
The attack, just after 10 a.m., touched off a daylong lockdown at the nation’s largest veterans home, which occupies a sprawling 600-acre state campus. The victims died in a building where they worked with The Pathway Home, a private organization that helps traumatized veterans transition to civilian life.- Source
`
Another GUN massacre for the gun nuts to celebrate. What the NRA's response to this going to be? Arm the residents, CNA'a, nurses, doctors and staff?
Well.....it was a democrat gun free zone...why don't you ask the democrats why they keep gun free killing zones open for business...
Bush signed the order for gun free zones-derpa...
Wrong! It was Bubba Clinton and only applied to schools. Check your sources. The original law, signed by G. H. W. Bush, was declared unconstitutional and was not corrected until 1996. Who was POTUS in 1996?
"The Supreme Court of the United States subsequently held that the Act was an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). This was the first time in over half a century that the Supreme Court limited Congressional authority to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Following the Lopez decision, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno proposed changes to 18 U.S.C. § 922(q) that were adopted in section 657 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, Pub.L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3009, enacted September 30, 1996"
Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 - Wikipedia
Again....millions of veterans, one guy shoots people......this is why we don't trust you...any excuse and you will use it to take Rights away from Americans...you just can't fucking help yourselves.
When one child was killed with a lawn dart, we banned lawn darts.
When one guy failed to blow up a plane with a shoe bomb, we all had to take off our shoes and scan them.
11,000 gun murders, every year, and you guys don't take even the most obvious step to keep guns out of the hands of crazy people.
Probably because if we applied any kind of mental health standard to gun ownership, most NRA fanatics wouldn't pass.
Technically, that is not a rifle as it does not spin the projectile, but I appreciate the thought!Can someone explain to me what a "low-powered rifle" is because every journalist cannot help themselves but use "high-powered rifle" when describing any rifle? Surely one exists, but I have never heard of any use for one.
Sad, people die and the left goes straight to their gun grabbing.
It's getting tiresome watching the loons politicize tragedy to further the agenda
Um, no, the sad thing was this mentally disturbed person was able to get a gun and kill people with it because it's too easy to get guns.
Sorry you don't see that.
Yet Bush signed the first law and they changed it, it still means it had bipartisan support....And your point is as salient as a myopic dog...Recognize the facts if you want any damn respect from me....It's not and never has been a partisan issue till 2018....And the Goddamned pigs are armed that are assigned to schools so technically they have someone there to help protect....But it doesn't do any good to have arms if those with the arms are cowards....Pretty sad when a teen can outmaneuver a bunch of old fucks that can't do their jobs....You want retirees and mental patients to all be armed? Yeah that's a catastrophe waiting to happen...`
A decorated Army veteran with a high-powered rifle returned to the Veterans Home of California in Yountville, where he had recently been kicked out of a program for treatment of combat stress, and killed three mental health workers Friday, officials said.
He and the victims were found dead about 8 hours after he exchanged gunfire with a Napa County sheriff’s deputy, officials said.
The attack, just after 10 a.m., touched off a daylong lockdown at the nation’s largest veterans home, which occupies a sprawling 600-acre state campus. The victims died in a building where they worked with The Pathway Home, a private organization that helps traumatized veterans transition to civilian life.- Source
`
Another GUN massacre for the gun nuts to celebrate. What the NRA's response to this going to be? Arm the residents, CNA'a, nurses, doctors and staff?
Well.....it was a democrat gun free zone...why don't you ask the democrats why they keep gun free killing zones open for business...
Bush signed the order for gun free zones-derpa...
Wrong! It was Bubba Clinton and only applied to schools. Check your sources. The original law, signed by G. H. W. Bush, was declared unconstitutional and was not corrected until 1996. Who was POTUS in 1996?
"The Supreme Court of the United States subsequently held that the Act was an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). This was the first time in over half a century that the Supreme Court limited Congressional authority to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Following the Lopez decision, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno proposed changes to 18 U.S.C. § 922(q) that were adopted in section 657 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, Pub.L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3009, enacted September 30, 1996"
Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 - Wikipedia
Technically, that is not a rifle as it does not spin the projectile, but I appreciate the thought!Can someone explain to me what a "low-powered rifle" is because every journalist cannot help themselves but use "high-powered rifle" when describing any rifle? Surely one exists, but I have never heard of any use for one.
Sad, people die and the left goes straight to their gun grabbing.
It's getting tiresome watching the loons politicize tragedy to further the agenda
Um, no, the sad thing was this mentally disturbed person was able to get a gun and kill people with it because it's too easy to get guns.
Sorry you don't see that.
It was in California, strict gun laws....don't YOU see that you befuddled twit?
Yet Bush signed the first law and they changed it, it still means it had bipartisan support....And your point is as salient as a myopic dog...Recognize the facts if you want any damn respect from me....It's not and never has been a partisan issue till 2018....And the Goddamned pigs are armed that are assigned to schools so technically they have someone there to help protect....But it doesn't do any good to have arms if those with the arms are cowards....Pretty sad when a teen can outmaneuver a bunch of old fucks that can't do their jobs....You want retirees and mental patients to all be armed? Yeah that's a catastrophe waiting to happen...`
`
Another GUN massacre for the gun nuts to celebrate. What the NRA's response to this going to be? Arm the residents, CNA'a, nurses, doctors and staff?
Well.....it was a democrat gun free zone...why don't you ask the democrats why they keep gun free killing zones open for business...
Bush signed the order for gun free zones-derpa...
Wrong! It was Bubba Clinton and only applied to schools. Check your sources. The original law, signed by G. H. W. Bush, was declared unconstitutional and was not corrected until 1996. Who was POTUS in 1996?
"The Supreme Court of the United States subsequently held that the Act was an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). This was the first time in over half a century that the Supreme Court limited Congressional authority to legislate under the Commerce Clause.
Following the Lopez decision, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno proposed changes to 18 U.S.C. § 922(q) that were adopted in section 657 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, Pub.L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3009, enacted September 30, 1996"
Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 - Wikipedia
The second law is a dodge also. The federal government has no right to dictate laws on school campuses based on Interstate Commerce.
By rights, I could build my own gun and take it on campus today of it was never involved in interstate commerce.
As for respect from you I don't need it, because you continuously show disrespect for yourself by publicly displaying your ignorance.
Then you need better security and you need law enforcement to do their job....this guy did not just go nuts.....his doctors knew him and ignored him...that is on them, not law abiding gun owners......moron.
The problem is you asswipes keep letting violent gun criminals out of jail...over and over again.......
The problem isn't John and Jane Q. Citizen who own guns to protect themselves from the criminals you let out of jail.....and we know this because as more Americans own and carry guns...our crime rates have gone down, not up....
It was in California, strict gun laws....don't YOU see that you befuddled twit?
Then you need better security and you need law enforcement to do their job....this guy did not just go nuts.....his doctors knew him and ignored him...that is on them, not law abiding gun owners......moron.
No, it's on the fact he could buy a gun when he had no business owning a gun.
His doctors knew him.....they knew his issues but it was the VA, the health care system created by the government specifically to care for Veterans like him....and it failed......because the government can't run anything well......and people like you want all of us to have VA style healthcare......that is the problem...
Right, so lets pass some more useless laws, huh?The problem is you asswipes keep letting violent gun criminals out of jail...over and over again.......
The problem isn't John and Jane Q. Citizen who own guns to protect themselves from the criminals you let out of jail.....and we know this because as more Americans own and carry guns...our crime rates have gone down, not up....
Our crime rates are still horrible for an advanced country... and if they are going down it's because as a population, we are getting older and less likely to do that kind of thing.
Yeah, the problem really is John Q Citizen shooting Jane over who ate the last strip of bacon. And John Q. Citizen shooting up his boss because he got fired. And John Q. Citizen shooting up a VA home because he was a nut who could get a gun.
It was in California, strict gun laws....don't YOU see that you befuddled twit?
Strict Gun laws are like arguing over which leper has the most fingers.
NONE of our gun laws are particularly effective when you can drive over to the next state and buy all the guns you want.
You frag your CO?His doctors knew him.....they knew his issues but it was the VA, the health care system created by the government specifically to care for Veterans like him....and it failed......because the government can't run anything well......and people like you want all of us to have VA style healthcare......that is the problem...
I've used the VA a bunch of times... they are actually pretty awesome.
But that's not the point here, this was a non-profit participating in a VA program, not the VA itself.
(I also wouldn't be surprised if this guy was never near a battlefield, he was just a nut who likes him some guns.)
The problem is you asswipes keep letting violent gun criminals out of jail...over and over again.......
The problem isn't John and Jane Q. Citizen who own guns to protect themselves from the criminals you let out of jail.....and we know this because as more Americans own and carry guns...our crime rates have gone down, not up....
Our crime rates are still horrible for an advanced country... and if they are going down it's because as a population, we are getting older and less likely to do that kind of thing.
Yeah, the problem really is John Q Citizen shooting Jane over who ate the last strip of bacon. And John Q. Citizen shooting up his boss because he got fired. And John Q. Citizen shooting up a VA home because he was a nut who could get a gun.
It was in California, strict gun laws....don't YOU see that you befuddled twit?
Strict Gun laws are like arguing over which leper has the most fingers.
NONE of our gun laws are particularly effective when you can drive over to the next state and buy all the guns you want.
The problem is you asswipes keep letting violent gun criminals out of jail...over and over again.......
The problem isn't John and Jane Q. Citizen who own guns to protect themselves from the criminals you let out of jail.....and we know this because as more Americans own and carry guns...our crime rates have gone down, not up....
Our crime rates are still horrible for an advanced country... and if they are going down it's because as a population, we are getting older and less likely to do that kind of thing.
Yeah, the problem really is John Q Citizen shooting Jane over who ate the last strip of bacon. And John Q. Citizen shooting up his boss because he got fired. And John Q. Citizen shooting up a VA home because he was a nut who could get a gun.
It was in California, strict gun laws....don't YOU see that you befuddled twit?
Strict Gun laws are like arguing over which leper has the most fingers.
NONE of our gun laws are particularly effective when you can drive over to the next state and buy all the guns you want.
Then you need better security and you need law enforcement to do their job....this guy did not just go nuts.....his doctors knew him and ignored him...that is on them, not law abiding gun owners......moron.
No, it's on the fact he could buy a gun when he had no business owning a gun.
You frag your CO?His doctors knew him.....they knew his issues but it was the VA, the health care system created by the government specifically to care for Veterans like him....and it failed......because the government can't run anything well......and people like you want all of us to have VA style healthcare......that is the problem...
I've used the VA a bunch of times... they are actually pretty awesome.
But that's not the point here, this was a non-profit participating in a VA program, not the VA itself.
(I also wouldn't be surprised if this guy was never near a battlefield, he was just a nut who likes him some guns.)
Everyone behind bars was once a "law-abiding citizen". Letting anyone who wants a gun have a gun isn`t going so well.Then you need better security and you need law enforcement to do their job....this guy did not just go nuts.....his doctors knew him and ignored him...that is on them, not law abiding gun owners......moron.
No, it's on the fact he could buy a gun when he had no business owning a gun.
No law aimed at law-abiding citizens will stop that. There's a law against having Heroin.
Everyone behind bars was once a "law-abiding citizen". Letting anyone who wants a gun have a gun isn`t going so well.Then you need better security and you need law enforcement to do their job....this guy did not just go nuts.....his doctors knew him and ignored him...that is on them, not law abiding gun owners......moron.
No, it's on the fact he could buy a gun when he had no business owning a gun.
No law aimed at law-abiding citizens will stop that. There's a law against having Heroin.
