Talking gibberish you need to translateDo you have a right to murder someone
-?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Talking gibberish you need to translateDo you have a right to murder someone
-?
A right is something that cannot be legally denied, such as the rights to free speech, press, religion, and raising a family. A privilege is something that can be given and taken away and is considered to be a special advantage or opportunity that is available only to certain people.Untrue. Can you name any other right that has no restrictions on it? (hint: copyright, libel and slander vs 1st)
Again untrue. The freedom of assembly is restricted by states and localities when they require permits for concerts and parades.
Do you even know what a right is?
You need to live in a fascist country that fits your life style. Pig.All guns must be registered with the local police.
You register your gun an get a security permit for the gun
can get a home security permit
You can get a carry permit
If you are caught with a firearm in public without a permit for the gun you are fined $10,000
If you are caught a second time in public with a gun, you are fined $10,000, the gun is confiscated, and you are forbidden to buy a gun for life.
-
So you assume everyone who might choose to commit suicide is somehow mentally ill?I believe the success rate is way lower than with guns.
Anyone in their right mind, yes. My father was depressed about a medical issue and tried suicide by pills but failed. He ended up living happy and healthy for another 20 years. If he'd used a gun...
Not necessarily true.Suicidal tendencies are a mental illness. If you or someone you know is experiencing suicidal thoughts express your thoughts with a friend who may be able to relieve your friend of these thoughts.
If this is not helping, make an appointment with a Doctor.
Just a friendly suggestion
-
I fail to see the distinction. Both require following guidelines for proper use before the right can be exercised.Nope...those permits are for using a public space where more than one group may want to use the space on the same day, and it also allows the town or city time to get police and public works involved.....
The permit you are talking about is a prior restraint on the exercise of a Right...that is unConstitutional.
You need to go back to law school for a refresher since that is absolutely not true. The right of the people peaceably to assemble can be denied if it conflicts with the rights of others, namely their safety.A right is something that cannot be legally denied, such as the rights to free speech, press, religion, and raising a family. A privilege is something that can be given and taken away and is considered to be a special advantage or opportunity that is available only to certain people.
You can assemble on private property with no permits.Untrue. Can you name any other right that has no restrictions on it? (hint: copyright, libel and slander vs 1st)
Again untrue. The freedom of assembly is restricted by states and localities when they require permits for concerts and parades.
Do you even know what a right is?
You need to know the definition of a right and privilegeYou need to go back to law school for a refresher since that is absolutely not true. The right of the people peaceably to assemble can be denied if it conflicts with the rights of others, namely their safety.
And how does it conflict with the rights of others if that assembly is held on private property?You need to go back to law school for a refresher since that is absolutely not true. The right of the people peaceably to assemble can be denied if it conflicts with the rights of others, namely their safety.
You're either very ignorant or very delusional. There are no absolute rights in the constitution, every one comes with restrictions. That is why we have a SCOTUS.You need to know the definition of a right and privilege
Rights are rights and cannot be infringed on privileges are grant by the government.
The road to Woodstock, 1969:And how does it conflict with the rights of others if that assembly is held on private property?
When and how would any assembly conflict with the rights of another person?
You need to know that the regulation of firearms consistent with Second Amendment jurisprudence does not constitute ‘infringement.’You need to know the definition of a right and privilege
Rights are rights and cannot be infringed on privileges are grant by the government.
This is as much a lie now as it was last February – just as wrong, ignorant, and baseless.Gun registration...yes, the democrats want it, yes, they want to use it to ban and confiscate guns....
Ok dumbass what does the right to keep and bear arms shall not be in fringed mean in context with regulations?You need to know that the regulation of firearms consistent with Second Amendment jurisprudence does not constitute ‘infringement.’
The Second Amendment right is not unlimited; it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
Government has the authority to place limits and restrictions on the Second Amendment right consistent with its case law.
Second Amendment ‘absolutism’ is as ignorant as it is wrongheaded.
Ok so slavery can be reinstituted?You're either very ignorant or very delusional. There are no absolute rights in the constitution, every one comes with restrictions. That is why we have a SCOTUS.
Well liar you need to get on the same page as with your fellow gun grabbing sons of a bitch democrats. This way you will not longer look like a horses assThis is as much a lie now as it was last February – just as wrong, ignorant, and baseless.
Gun registration is perfectly lawful and Constitutional; it fails as a slippery slope fallacy to claim that gun registration results in ‘bans’ and ‘confiscations.’
And it is a lie to claim that Democrats seek to ‘ban’ or ‘confiscate’ guns.
What is true is that conservatives are liars and demagogues – this thread is further proof of that.
Private propretyThe road to Woodstock, 1969:
I fail to see the distinction. Both require following guidelines for proper use before the right can be exercised.
The right of the people peaceably to assemble can be denied by a locality if there is a valid public safety reason. Why is bearing arms any different?
I fail to see the distinction. Both require following guidelines for proper use before the right can be exercised.
The right of the people peaceably to assemble can be denied by a locality if there is a valid public safety reason. Why is bearing arms any different?