Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying they weren't intimidating anyone?
No.
Then what the fuck ARE you saying?
Then what the fuck ARE you saying?
I'm saying that they were intimidating someone.
Pretty clear I thought.
Then what the fuck ARE you saying?
I'm saying that they were intimidating someone.
Pretty clear I thought.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
I'm saying that they were intimidating someone.
Pretty clear I thought.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
I'm saying that they were intimidating someone.
Pretty clear I thought.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
That isn't my logic, it is the logic of the people who think guns are scary. My logic is that only idiots are afraid of guns.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
True.
Again, the gun owners were irresponsible, the open carrying of the firearms was intended to intimidate, and not a good faith expression of Second Amendment rights, whether legal or not.
Its this type of behavior that gives those of us who own guns and advocate for Second Amendment rights a bad name.
In other words, they were bullies, even though they weren't doing anything illegal or immoral. Logically, you must believe that carrying a weapon makes people afraid.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
That isn't my logic, it is the logic of the people who think guns are scary. My logic is that only idiots are afraid of guns.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
That isn't my logic, it is the logic of the people who think guns are scary. My logic is that only idiots are afraid of guns.
So you see no difference between walking onto a shooting range carrying a rifle or walking into a kindergarten carrying the same weapon?
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
True.
Again, the gun owners were irresponsible, the open carrying of the firearms was intended to intimidate, and not a good faith expression of Second Amendment rights, whether legal or not.
Its this type of behavior that gives those of us who own guns and advocate for Second Amendment rights a bad name.
The immediate knee-jerk reaction of rabid Second Amendment proponents is to defend any action by a fellow gun owner, no matter how egregious or ill-considered.
Look at how the Zimmerman case instantly became a rallying point for gun-rights advocates.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
That isn't my logic, it is the logic of the people who think guns are scary. My logic is that only idiots are afraid of guns.
If that's your logic it's a frank confession. He didn't say the guns make people afraid, but rather the people behind them.
But either way by your eternal logic of "everybody but me is a stupid idiot", those little kids in Newtown and those Amish girls in Pennsylvania and those movie patrons in Aurora, they must be real morons. And the survivors who watched it all go down, they must be even stupider.
That isn't my logic, it is the logic of the people who think guns are scary. My logic is that only idiots are afraid of guns.
If that's your logic it's a frank confession. He didn't say the guns make people afraid, but rather the people behind them.
But either way by your eternal logic of "everybody but me is a stupid idiot", those little kids in Newtown and those Amish girls in Pennsylvania and those movie patrons in Aurora, they must be real morons. And the survivors who watched it all go down, they must be even stupider.
You already said they didn't break a law. Since they didn't break the law, and intimidating people with a gun is illegal in Texas, they didn't intimidate anyone.
That means you think guns are scary, and are willing to lie to make political points.
Your logic is illogical.
The situation and context is important.
True.
Again, the gun owners were irresponsible, the open carrying of the firearms was intended to intimidate, and not a good faith expression of Second Amendment rights, whether legal or not.
Its this type of behavior that gives those of us who own guns and advocate for Second Amendment rights a bad name.
The immediate knee-jerk reaction of rabid Second Amendment proponents is to defend any action by a fellow gun owner, no matter how egregious or ill-considered.
Look at how the Zimmerman case instantly became a rallying point for gun-rights advocates.
If that's your logic it's a frank confession. He didn't say the guns make people afraid, but rather the people behind them.
But either way by your eternal logic of "everybody but me is a stupid idiot", those little kids in Newtown and those Amish girls in Pennsylvania and those movie patrons in Aurora, they must be real morons. And the survivors who watched it all go down, they must be even stupider.
You already said they didn't break a law. Since they didn't break the law, and intimidating people with a gun is illegal in Texas, they didn't intimidate anyone.
That means you think guns are scary, and are willing to lie to make political points.
Uh ---- no. I wasn't there, ergo there's no element for me to be scared of. Secondly, I did not say they didn't break "a" law. As for lying to make political points, I wouldn't dream of taking your job. (Like you just did -- I can't compete with that.)
Fourth, as for "they didn't intimidate anyone", see the intervening post between yours and this one for yet another admission that that's exactly what they did. See also the police in the video specifically moving the OCT away.
Failure on all fpur points. 0 for 4 with four strikeouts. I believe that's called the "golden sombrero".
True.
Again, the gun owners were irresponsible, the open carrying of the firearms was intended to intimidate, and not a good faith expression of Second Amendment rights, whether legal or not.
Its this type of behavior that gives those of us who own guns and advocate for Second Amendment rights a bad name.
The immediate knee-jerk reaction of rabid Second Amendment proponents is to defend any action by a fellow gun owner, no matter how egregious or ill-considered.
Look at how the Zimmerman case instantly became a rallying point for gun-rights advocates.
Absolutely, they do. Either they support whatever any gun nut does, or they say, as in the deaths of all those children in Newtown, that it is just collateral damage: no big deal, the numbers just aren't big enough to make it important enough to consider serious gun control. I wonder what any of them would think if it was their child killed in a school rampage. No, we don't need to wonder. They'd want more guns. They'd want teachers to be armed. Their solution for the gun problem is more guns. Pour more gasoline on the fire.