Ground war probably unavoidable now.

9 years in Iraq and 20 years in Afghanistan. How long do you think Trump's war is going to take and how many Americans will die so that Israel can have the "gay" capitol of the world in Tel Aviv? Would you want to die so Zionists can "poke" each other from behind? That's truly sick.
That was then, this is now. 😐
And your antisemitism is disgusting. Are you a Nazi or a Muslim?
:eek2yum:
Perhaps you're an antisemite conspiracy goober, who knows?
All I know is people like you were not prevalent in the America I grew up in and should never be.
 
That was then, this is now. 😐
And your antisemitism is disgusting. Are you a Nazi or a Muslim?
:eek2yum:
Perhaps you're an antisemite conspiracy goober, who knows?
All I know is people like you were not prevalent in the America I grew up in and should never be.
What do you think about Chuck Schumer, Karl Marx, and Adam Schiff? Be careful now ... they "chosen ones."
 
what does the crew think about 5 weeks?

fwiw, we've been sold that line before......

~S~
 
The New York Times reports that, as a result of Iran’s attacks, all U.S. military bases in the Middle East have been so heavily bombed that they are “virtually uninhabitable”
 
9 years in Iraq and 20 years in Afghanistan. How long do you think Trump's war is going to take and how many Americans will die so that Israel can have the "gay" capitol of the world in Tel Aviv? Would you want to die so Zionists can "poke" each other from behind? That's truly sick.
So far, the only deaths have come directly at the hands of Iranian missiles and drones on bases of our allies. How many innocent civilians have been killed in Israel or our other allies' civilian populations?
 
Iran possesses a massive, indigenously produced missile arsenal, with production capabilities estimated at over 100 missiles per month. This high-volume production, coupled with thousands of drones, is designed to overwhelm regional air defenses. Iran's ability to maintain these supplies, despite sanctions, poses a sustained threat to regional stability.
Al Jazeera +1
Key Aspects of Iran's Missile Capabilities:
  • Production Volume: Estimates indicate Iran can produce over 100 missiles per month, often outpacing the production of interceptors used by the U.S. and its allies to stop them.
  • Arsenal Size: Iran holds an extensive arsenal of ballistic and cruise missiles developed over decades to compensate for a lack of a modern air force.
  • Range: Iran has claimed to limit its missile range to


  • Proxy Supply: Iran provides missiles and drones to its regional partners, strengthening its regional influence and increasing the threats.
  • Strategic Threat: Experts note that while US/Israel strikes can degrade Iran's launch capabilities, its high-volume, "endless-like" production allows them to continue threatening the region.
  • Sustainment: While Iran's ability to produce weapons under sanctions is a concern, sustained high-intensity combat could still exhaust its stocks over time.
    BBC +6
Although some of Iran's capacities were damaged in recent conflicts, its ability to manufacture these weapons domestically ensures they retain a significant threat in the region.
Al Jazeera +1



US says it has destroyed Iran missile capacity: How is Iran still shooting?
Mar 16, 2026 — Despite degraded launch capabilities, Iran has enough missiles to fire strategically and keep the region on edge, experts say. Joint attacks by the United State...
faviconV2

Al Jazeera

images
If you know this and Al Jazeera promotes it then it should be expected that the pentagon has been aware for some time. You’d assume they’d be prepared.
 
Sseems to me we have some s'more scale nukes that could inflict quit a lot of damage without obliterating an entire country.... Annette we also have a non-nuclear device that can level everything within a 3 mile radius. So why aren't we using them? And why didn't we use them in Afghanistan instead of having a long drawn out ground war? Even with potential terrorist factions hiding in caves in the mountains fire power like that would cause such incredible destruction and probably avalanches and cavins that we would get a whole bunch of them. But that was never done. No. We had a long drawn out war of boots on the ground. And probably no less civilian life wasted than if we had just gotten it over with.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom