Ground war probably unavoidable now.

[SaxonJackson]

And they've had all that time to think on it too Sax......and a loose cannon was elected.......imagine that! ........wtf are we protecting again?

~S~

The idiots running the show truly believe that God has commanded them to help with the "Greater Israel Project." They think that they're doing God's work by expanding Israel's borders and helping them build "the third temple." A fringe group of so-called "christian" zealots (the Evangelicals for the most part) and a secular group of Jewish zealots (called Zionists) have teamed up to create the Zionist State. The goal is for Israel to rule over "the New World Order" (called the Golden Age by Trump). And the ultimate goal is to create a One-World Government ruled by Israel with us Goyim as the slave class.

 

[BS Filter]

Left them alone. They didn't pose an imminent threat. The experts say that they weren't even close to producing a nuke. Trump had already claimed victory for bombing their nuclear facilities.

Our own government poses a greater threat to our freedom and Mexico poses a greater threat to our people.

What experts are you referring to?

 

[BS Filter]

The idiots running the show truly believe that God has commanded them to help with the "Greater Israel Project." They think that they're doing God's work by expanding Israel's borders and helping them build "the third temple." A fringe group of so-called "christian" zealots (the Evangelicals for the most part) and a secular group of Jewish zealots (called Zionists) have teamed up to create the Zionist State. The goal is for Israel to rule over "the New World Order" (called the Golden Age by Trump). And the ultimate goal is to create a One-World Government ruled by Israel with us Goyim as the slave class.

Fascinating. Can you refer me to that information, or is that totally your own original idea?

 

[SaxonJackson]

What experts are you referring to?

Intelligence Assessments on Iran's Nuclear Program​

U.S. Intelligence Community​

• National Intelligence Director: Confirmed to Congress that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that its supreme leader had not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program.
• U.S. Intelligence Reports: Consistently indicated that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon and was several years away from being able to produce one.

Expert Opinions​

• Nuclear Experts: Various experts, including those from the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, have stated there was no evidence that Iran was close to developing a nuclear bomb.
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): The IAEA has reported that while Iran had enriched uranium to higher levels, it did not indicate an active effort to build a nuclear weapon.

Key Statements​

• Tulsi Gabbard: During her testimony, she reiterated that the intelligence community assessed Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.
• Joe Kent (Ex-Counterterrorism Chief): Asserted that there was no intelligence suggesting Iran was close to making nuclear weapons, emphasizing a religious ruling against such development since 2004.

This consensus among intelligence officials and experts highlights a significant disconnect between official assessments and public claims made by some political figures regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities.

Scientific American Wikipedia

 

[SaxonJackson]

Fascinating. Can you refer me to that information, or is that totally your own original idea?

What is 'Greater Israel'?

From biblical origins to modern-day Zionism, the vision of Greater Israel continues to shape Israeli rhetoric and regional tensions

www.middleeasteye.net

Henry Kissinger (A "Chosen One")

 

[BS Filter]

Intelligence Assessments on Iran's Nuclear Program​

U.S. Intelligence Community​

• National Intelligence Director: Confirmed to Congress that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that its supreme leader had not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program.
• U.S. Intelligence Reports: Consistently indicated that Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon and was several years away from being able to produce one.

Expert Opinions​

• Nuclear Experts: Various experts, including those from the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, have stated there was no evidence that Iran was close to developing a nuclear bomb.
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): The IAEA has reported that while Iran had enriched uranium to higher levels, it did not indicate an active effort to build a nuclear weapon.

Key Statements​

• Tulsi Gabbard: During her testimony, she reiterated that the intelligence community assessed Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.
• Joe Kent (Ex-Counterterrorism Chief): Asserted that there was no intelligence suggesting Iran was close to making nuclear weapons, emphasizing a religious ruling against such development since 2004.

This consensus among intelligence officials and experts highlights a significant disconnect between official assessments and public claims made by some political figures regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities.

Scientific American Wikipedia

Do you believe wikipedia is a trusted source?

 

[SaxonJackson]

Do you believe wikipedia is a trusted source?

It is in this case. But you can find information on this subject all over the place.

 

[BS Filter]

What is 'Greater Israel'?

From biblical origins to modern-day Zionism, the vision of Greater Israel continues to shape Israeli rhetoric and regional tensions

www.middleeasteye.net

Henry Kissinger (A "Chosen One")

Do you believe that this source is fair and balanced or biased?

 

[BS Filter]

It is in this case. But you can find information on this subject all over the place.

Are you aware that wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone?

 

[SaxonJackson]

Do you believe that this source is fair and balanced or biased?

It's informational. We're all biased. You, me, and the next guy. But if I say "the sun is very hot" I'm telling the truth no matter what my personal ideology is. So simply ignoring or denying what someone says based purely on their ideological lean is not a wise thing for a truth seeker to do.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Are you aware that wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone?

Not just anyone but they can be edited. Nevertheless, I have learned many interesting facts by reading Wikipedia articles. But there are plenty of other sources for finding the truth. You just need to search them out. If, that is, you're actually interested in finding the truth.

 

[BS Filter]

It's informational. We're all biased. You, me, and the next guy. But if I say "the sun is very hot" I'm telling the truth no matter what my personal ideology is. So simply ignoring or denying what someone says based purely on their ideological lean is not a wise thing for a truth seeker to do.

Are you supportive of Israel being destroyed?

 

[BS Filter]

Not just anyone but they can be edited. Nevertheless, I have learned many interesting facts by reading Wikipedia articles. But there are plenty of other sources for finding the truth. You just need to search them out. If, that is, you're actually interested in finding the truth.

Yes, I am seeking the truth. I believe the only threat to peace in the Middle East is Iran and their proxies, hamas and hezbollah.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Iran seems to have an endless supply of missiles. Apparently they have underground factory complexes and a direct line to parts from China who is willingly supplying them with all the parts they need to continue their standoff.

You have to remember to this regime the suffering of their people is meaningless. There's no way to vote them out so they don't give a shit what the people think.

Having said that it seems apparent that Iran will continue to launch missile strikes until they are physically stopped which will take boots on the ground and represent a huge number of American combat deaths.

This is not going to be pretty.

Jo

I hope you are wrong, but if you are right, my family business is set to buy residential and commercial properties in our multi-county region. The recession may be far worse than 2008.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Yes, I am seeking the truth. I believe the only threat to peace in the Middle East is Iran and their proxies, hamas and hezbollah.

Trump's inability to manage the war is such a great problem as is that of Iran's.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Are you supportive of Israel being destroyed?

As long as they keep bombing their neighbors on a routine basis then perhaps their total destruction would be a benefit for all.

OR

They can learn to be good neighbors and stop instigating problems ALL THE TIME. Beyond that, I'm not fan of Zionism and the Greater Israel Project. I don't personally believe that the majority of "Jews" running Israel have any relationship to biblical Israel. Most of them hail from eastern Europe (Poland, Ukraine, and Russia) and are descendants of the Khazar/Ashkenazi peoples who converted to Judaism in the 7th & 8th Centuries, A.D.

https://www.amazon.com/Thirteenth-Tribe-Arthur-Koestler/dp/0945001428?tag=usmb-20

 

[SaxonJackson]

Yes, I am seeking the truth. I believe the only threat to peace in the Middle East is Iran and their proxies, hamas and hezbollah.

You've learned the FOX talking points quite well. Good for you!!

Did you believe Trump when he said going to war with Iran was a bad idea? Did you believe him when he said he was the "President of Peace?" Yeah ... I did too.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Greater Israel will always win.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump's inability to manage the war is such a great problem as is that of Iran's.

Looks like the Iranian regime is dying.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Looks like the Iranian regime is dying.

Something will spring out of the ashes.