Ralph Norton
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2022
- 4,855
- 4,923
- 1,928
16 is the age of consent in many states.
Which part of my comment says anything about California?not in California... You obviously didn't read the article, did you?
Dumb ass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
16 is the age of consent in many states.
Which part of my comment says anything about California?not in California... You obviously didn't read the article, did you?
Yet, the left has no problem with 16 year olds claiming they're boys when they were born girls and vice versa. I guess it depends on the agenda, huh.I have seen many male survivors state that it fucked up their minds. Obviously not everyone will be affected the same way but who are we to say it has no effect ?
16 year old boys should be seeing 16 year old girls.
As an expert, having spent twelve months as a sixteen year old, I know for a fact that "getting shagged", as your Brits call it, has no deleterious effects upon such an individual. On the contrary, it lessens feeling of frustration that often lead to very undesirable results.I have seen many male survivors state that it fucked up their minds. Obviously not everyone will be affected the same way but who are we to say it has no effect ?
16 year old boys should be seeing 16 year old girls.
That First Amendment sure gets in the way a lot for you, doesn't it.I might be strange, but I don't joke about Statutory Rape. No humor at all.
I dont think that the two issues are the same.Yet, the left has no problem with 16 year olds claiming they're boys when they were born girls and vice versa. I guess it depends on the agenda, huh.
I don't think anyone is defending the teacher here.Doesn't matter, the teacher knew better
Well I think that I might have enjoyed it with some teachers that I can remember. But that is our personal anecdotal position.It doesnt cover every 16 year old. A line has to be drawn somewhere and 16 seems to be about right to me.As an expert, having spent twelve months as a sixteen year old, I know for a fact that "getting shagged", as your Brits call it, has no deleterious effects upon such an individual. On the contrary, it lessens feeling of frustration that often lead to very undesirable results.
Briefly put, you and the others here lamenting what happened for (not to) this young man are entirely off the mark. The woman was pretty stupid for taking the chance, but the male was lucky to have had it.
I have seen no threads about 6 year old's, nor do I remember making comments about 6 year old's.That First Amendment sure gets in the way a lot for you, doesn't it.
Like I said, if you had as much compassion for a 6 year old as you do for a 16 year,
I would have more respect for you and your opinion.
Your just a stooge for your masters.
So far you haven't denied it, and you're are such a leftwing loon, I don't thinkI have seen no threads about 6 year old's, nor do I remember making comments about 6 year old's.
At this point you are speculating.
They both deal with minors involved in adult behavior. That's my point. One is permissible and one isn't. Why?I dont think that the two issues are the same.
My thread on the Anniversary of Uvalde was dedicated to remembering the death of children.So far you haven't denied it, and you're are such a leftwing loon, I don't think
you would. Step up and just say that you don't want the trannies in the schools.
(Some that give lap dances)
Come on, you can do it.
My premise is that the left is all up in arms about a 16 year old boy willingly gets laid by a teacher.My thread on the Anniversary of Uvalde was dedicated to remembering the death of children.
If that isn't good enough, too bad. Open a thread on trannies and look for my comments.
My premise is that the left is all up in arms about a 16 year old boy willingly gets laid by a teacher.
I am still against that because the teacher abused her position.
But, the left embraces very young children to be subjected to the deviant trannies.
And you still can't bring yourself to say that you are against that. Speaks volumes with
who you are.
Just embrace it because it seems that you own it.
One is a child making their own decision. The other is an adult making decisions for the child.They both deal with minors involved in adult behavior. That's my point. One is permissible and one isn't. Why?
Still deflecting, I kinda figured you couldn't do it.
Great article. Statutory rape is nothing to joke about!
The student wasn't forced.One is a child making their own decision. The other is an adult making decisions for the child.
All teenagers have a "sexual awakening," when they try and work out who they are. That is normal. What is not normal is a 40 year old adult making that decision for them. An adult in a position of authority.
what exactly are you implying?Still deflecting, I kinda figured you couldn't do it.
It's okay, well, it's not, but at least we all know with out a doubt your stance on trannies and young children.
Well he was too young to give consent.The adult should have respected that.The student wasn't forced.
Implying?what exactly are you implying?