Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,753
- 32,736
- 2,180
Not really.It is to you, clearly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really.It is to you, clearly.
..
Of course I would worry about my job....
...
Of course I would worry about my job. Your thinking that you wouldn't confirms you are not a teacher.
So you would literally have killed the 6 year old.It has always been my policy that if anyone came into my classroom with the intent of harming any of my students, I would put them down as hard as necessary, job be damned.
I hardly think that would be necessary.So you would literally have killed the 6 year old.
...
I've said it before and I 'll say it again.
I want the confidentiallity for children REMOVED.
I want to know everythign about EVERYTHING in that ******* school, where a report of a child with a ******* gun was ignored.
Was that the first time a child with a gun was ignored? How many KNIVES have been brought to school?
What is the bullying situation? And don't talk shit to me about ZERO TOLERANCE when a ******* GUN was ignored, until a woman was shot.
ect. ect. ect.
Incompetent leftards are HIDING their damage done to society, behind this "CHILDREN CONFIDENTIALITY" clause.
So what exactly woul you do about a six year old with a gun in unknown condition?I hardly think that would be necessary.
Good thing you quit.I see your point. To some extent it's important to keep things confidential; for example, you don't get to know other kids' academic progress. But when it comes to SAFETY, yes.
My formerly beloved profession has a terrible track record of swinging wildly to extremes. So 15 years ago, with "zero tolerance", we had a kid suspended for chewing a pop tart in the shape of a gun. Now, we have kids regularly assaulting others, but we're big into "special needs" and etc, so if a kid has a label, is "traumatized" or "dysregulated", they get a pass. It's ridiculous.
So what exactly woul you do about a six year old with a gun in unknown condition?
...
I used to love teaching so much. Now, 10 days into retirement, I feel like I'm actually healing from a terrible experience
You will be fired and then sued, assuming that the kid will stand still and wait for you as you approach him and "secure" his arms, which seems highly unlikely. Most likely, he would pull out the gun and shoot you as soon as you started walking toward him.I would secure the kid's arms. Break one if necessary. Are you really this stupid?
As opposed to shot and killed? Easy choice.You will be fired and then sued...
Six years old.... assuming that the kid will stand still and wait for you as you approach him and "secure" his arms, which seems highly unlikely. Most likely, he would pull out the gun and shoot you as soon as you started walking toward him.
...
And nearly killed a teacher with one shot.Six years old.
... It took you more than three and a half hours to come up with even that lame answer ...
The problem with that "reasoning" is that those were not the only options.As opposed to shot and killed? Easy choice.
There isn’t enough time to reach over and grab a little kid’s arm, but there is time to make at least two calls and evacuate the school?The problem with that "reasoning" is that those were not the only options.
The teacher had been trained to notify admin in a case like that. That bringing no solution, calling 911 would be the logical next step, admin having failed to act.
Or evacuate the class, or go over the AP's head to the Principal or the superintendant.
I guess if he goes through your line and you see the gun, you could hit him with your serving spoon.
I didn't say time was the problem and I didn't say evacuate the school.There isn’t enough time to reach over and grab a little kid’s arm, but there is time to make at least two calls and evacuate the school?
Yeah, you kinda did.I didn't say time was the problem and I didn't say evacuate the school.
...