Green Party Commie Bitch Jill Stein Refuses To Cooperate With Russia Investigation!

What you guys on the left don't think the Russians helped Stein in an effort to beat Hillary?

Of course they did.

the only question is, was Stein, like Trump, a useful idiot or a co-conspirator.

The difference is that mueller has nothing on trump....no actual inelligence. Stein refuses to turn over any documents.

If you read the link in the OP you will find you last sentence is false.

She has turned some over but not all.

Yet you said she refuses to turn over ANY documents. Which you know admit is false.

Thanks for being honest enough to admit when you are wrong.

Do you think that people should turn over to the Senate anything they ask for without question?

She should bleach bit and destroy them. It helped clinton out.

How I miss the old days when those in power just had their favorite Marine standing at the shredder for hours on end.
 
The difference is that mueller has nothing on trump....no actual inelligence. Stein refuses to turn over any documents.

If you read the link in the OP you will find you last sentence is false.

She has turned some over but not all.

Yet you said she refuses to turn over ANY documents. Which you know admit is false.

Thanks for being honest enough to admit when you are wrong.

Do you think that people should turn over to the Senate anything they ask for without question?

She should bleach bit and destroy them. It helped clinton out.

How I miss the old days when those in power just had their favorite Marine standing at the shredder for hours on end.

So you are for destroying and withholding pertinent evidence.
 
For process crimes, lol. Any moron could ask someone a few questions change a word, a date, and then charge someone. Where's all the collusion?

Okay, you keep trying to tell us that this is no big deal...

except weren't you the guys going nuts over who marked emails as classified or not.

Trumps "control" of the FBI is debatable. Best thing he can do would be to zero out their budget and convert their field offices into charter schools

Yup, even the FBI is the enemy of the Trump Cult.

images
 
If you read the link in the OP you will find you last sentence is false.

She has turned some over but not all.

Yet you said she refuses to turn over ANY documents. Which you know admit is false.

Thanks for being honest enough to admit when you are wrong.

Do you think that people should turn over to the Senate anything they ask for without question?

She should bleach bit and destroy them. It helped clinton out.

How I miss the old days when those in power just had their favorite Marine standing at the shredder for hours on end.

So you are for destroying and withholding pertinent evidence.

Yeah that's it! Or it could be that I have been watching it go on for my whole adult life so I now choose to no longer be freaked out about it when the wrong party does it.

I am though for standing up for your constitutional rights and if you feel something is constitutionally protected then do not hand it over. If the one asking disagrees, then they have channels to work through.
 
For process crimes, lol. Any moron could ask someone a few questions change a word, a date, and then charge someone. Where's all the collusion?

Okay, you keep trying to tell us that this is no big deal...

except weren't you the guys going nuts over who marked emails as classified or not.

Trumps "control" of the FBI is debatable. Best thing he can do would be to zero out their budget and convert their field offices into charter schools

Yup, even the FBI is the enemy of the Trump Cult.

images

That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

upload_2018-4-29_7-13-46.png
 
And then when you actually read the story you find out that her campaign already turned in most of what the Senate asked for, just refusing parts they felt were unconstitutional to ask for.

But, of course the Trump zealot have no use for the constitution.
Time to raid her home and offices, correct? Constitutional rights mean nothing to the clowns that have been leading the witch hunt.

For Clinton they pardon everyone, destroy all the evidence and ignore the law because they believed Clinton was too stupid to understand the law.

The same ass wipes decide attorney-client privilege is no longer a thing in this county if it concerns Trump.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI will never be prosecuted, because they are the ones that gather evidence and prosecute.
 
And then when you actually read the story you find out that her campaign already turned in most of what the Senate asked for, just refusing parts they felt were unconstitutional to ask for.

But, of course the Trump zealot have no use for the constitution.
Time to raid her home and offices, correct? Constitutional rights mean nothing to the clowns that have been leading the witch hunt.

For Clinton they pardon everyone, destroy all the evidence and ignore the law because they believed Clinton was too stupid to understand the law.

The same ass wipes decide attorney-client privilege is no longer a thing in this county if it concerns Trump.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI will never be prosecuted, because they are the ones that gather evidence and prosecute.

When I read post like this I often wonder if the one making it just started paying attention to politics in the last couple years.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

It wasnt old electronic data. It was classified data on her private email server that she was destroying. Mueller is desperate. I actually would like to see this lawsuit that the dems recently started, go forward. This would allow for discovery. It would be comical watching the dems stutter and stall releasing any pertinent evidence.
 
And then when you actually read the story you find out that her campaign already turned in most of what the Senate asked for, just refusing parts they felt were unconstitutional to ask for.

But, of course the Trump zealot have no use for the constitution.
Time to raid her home and offices, correct? Constitutional rights mean nothing to the clowns that have been leading the witch hunt.

For Clinton they pardon everyone, destroy all the evidence and ignore the law because they believed Clinton was too stupid to understand the law.

The same ass wipes decide attorney-client privilege is no longer a thing in this county if it concerns Trump.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI will never be prosecuted, because they are the ones that gather evidence and prosecute.

When I read post like this I often wonder if the one making it just started paying attention to politics in the last couple years.

You had no problem with clinton destroying evidence?
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

Getting too close? Comey said trump wasnt being investigated. Are you confused? It is early.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560
Joe is delusional. Prove your Treason claim or shut the fuck up.

It not like he took hundreds of millions from the Russians like the Clinton's did. He did not purchase a dossier from the Kremlin and use it to try and throw a National election like Clinton did.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

It wasnt old electronic data. It was classified data on her private email server that she was destroying. Mueller is desperate. I actually would like to see this lawsuit that the dems recently started, go forward. This would allow for discovery. It would be comical watching the dems stutter and stall releasing any pertinent evidence.

I agree with you that what she destroyed she was wrong for doing so, of that there is little doubt.

I disagree with the idea that Mueller is desperate, why would he be? He is in a position in which he cannot fail and in which, based upon previous people in that position, he has a good 5 to 6 more years of digging for anything.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

Getting too close? Comey said trump wasnt being investigated. Are you confused? It is early.

He did? Do you have a link?
 
And then when you actually read the story you find out that her campaign already turned in most of what the Senate asked for, just refusing parts they felt were unconstitutional to ask for.

But, of course the Trump zealot have no use for the constitution.
Time to raid her home and offices, correct? Constitutional rights mean nothing to the clowns that have been leading the witch hunt.

For Clinton they pardon everyone, destroy all the evidence and ignore the law because they believed Clinton was too stupid to understand the law.

The same ass wipes decide attorney-client privilege is no longer a thing in this county if it concerns Trump.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI will never be prosecuted, because they are the ones that gather evidence and prosecute.

When I read post like this I often wonder if the one making it just started paying attention to politics in the last couple years.
They pardoned all the major players in the latest Clinton scandal, yes or no?

They destroyed the evidence after the the investigation, yes or no?

It all happened Gator. You know it.
 
What has the little commie socialist Jill Stein have to hide in the Russia probe? She was the one that had the audacity to demand a three state recount after the election which only showed more votes which should have been given Trump!

Now she is refusing to comply with the Senate Intelligence Committee to turn over documents seeking to discover the extent to which she worked with Russia to interfere in the election. What is the dried up little twat trying to hide from us? How deep are her connections with the DNC and Hillary? Why aren't the Democrats demanding action?

Jill Stein campaign declines doc requests in Senate Russia probe

I hope they send the FBI in as they did to Manafort and Cohen to bust down her door at 4AM and seize all her records and computers. Then stand the little slut up and do a full cavity search on her and shake her down until she spills the beans.

It will be when the FBI DOESN'T do any of that you will know the FIX IS IN. The Deep State is only interested in searching for evidence when it has a chance of harassing and implicating Trump.

The reality of Steim working for Putin is slim to none.

Now did she drain votes from Hillary Clinton that cost Clinton purple States like Wisconsin, Michigan, ans Pennsylvania?

Yes, but why?

Simple, the Wikileaks of documents showing the DNC dirty dealings hirt Clinton with Sanders voters but also the average Sanders voters saw Clinton for what she is and that is a political whore not worth voting for.

Now as for Stein possible link to Putin, well she need to turn all papers over and if not, well ya know people will whisper...

Hell many of Clinton voters hate her and the Green Party because they now realize it was a Green and not Trump that defeated their candidate again and Trump won because of it...
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

Getting too close? Comey said trump wasnt being investigated. Are you confused? It is early.

He did? Do you have a link?

Testifying before the senate intelligence committee on June 8, 2017, comey said trump wasn't under investigation.
 
And then when you actually read the story you find out that her campaign already turned in most of what the Senate asked for, just refusing parts they felt were unconstitutional to ask for.

But, of course the Trump zealot have no use for the constitution.
Time to raid her home and offices, correct? Constitutional rights mean nothing to the clowns that have been leading the witch hunt.

For Clinton they pardon everyone, destroy all the evidence and ignore the law because they believed Clinton was too stupid to understand the law.

The same ass wipes decide attorney-client privilege is no longer a thing in this county if it concerns Trump.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI will never be prosecuted, because they are the ones that gather evidence and prosecute.

When I read post like this I often wonder if the one making it just started paying attention to politics in the last couple years.

You had no problem with clinton destroying evidence?

Whether I have a problem with it or not is irrelevant.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

It wasnt old electronic data. It was classified data on her private email server that she was destroying. Mueller is desperate. I actually would like to see this lawsuit that the dems recently started, go forward. This would allow for discovery. It would be comical watching the dems stutter and stall releasing any pertinent evidence.

I agree with you that what she destroyed she was wrong for doing so, of that there is little doubt.

I disagree with the idea that Mueller is desperate, why would he be? He is in a position in which he cannot fail and in which, based upon previous people in that position, he has a good 5 to 6 more years of digging for anything.

He could carry it on for 50 years and rack up hundreds of process crimes but nothing substantive.
 
That wasn't an issue. Destroying evidence is.

So let me get this straight... deleting old electronic data you are no longer using is a crime... even though the regulations say that is what you are supposed to do.. .

But firing the FBI director because he's getting too close to your associates and their treason with Russia is just a "process crime".

Got it.

View attachment 190560

Getting too close? Comey said trump wasnt being investigated. Are you confused? It is early.

He did? Do you have a link?

Testifying before the senate intelligence committee on June 8, 2017, comey said trump wasn't under investigation.

True, he did say that. Keep in mind though that Richard Nixon was not under investigation at the beginning either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top