Gibson wasn't given a chance.
Which the entire point.
My contention is that the leagues were equal in talent.
People tend to give far to much credit to players who were denied playing in the big leagues.
I'm assuming he would have put the same numbers up in either league. Based on that assumption being true, he's the greatest ever.
He probaly would have been a star player, but best ever?
Yes and Yes.
We will never no, its an insult to the guys who played in the majors to say someone who didn't play in them would have topped them.
It's not an insult when you say the leagues were equally talented. I'm being nice too since the interleague games were heavily tipped in favor of the negro teams.
Also, barnstorming is NOT a valid means to compare, the ML players are on recond in their later years saying they always took it easy in such things since it was designed to highlight locals.
I'd like to see the quote of whoever said that. Then I would take it as nothing more than sour grapes. In America we try to win. those guys didn't know how to "take it easy". They were hotly contested games. Even if they did take it easy in such games(which they didn't), I have far more respect for the players who played hard in respect of the game. That makes them better in my book.
If you are going to include any kind of baseball, you might as well include Sadaharu Oh, who hit more HR then anybody, including Bonds.
And he would be worthy since I already considered him. My problem with Oh was that his best season ever for rbi was just 124. He averaged about 110. He never slugged more than .755. He had a ton of 30 and 40+ homer seasons with 3 seasons of over 50(55 being his highest).
Now Bonds homered every 12.92 at bats through his career. Oh homered every 10.64 at bats. Career wise, no one has ever been as impressive as Oh, except for Gibson with over 900 homers. All his stats cannot be tracked due to a lot of those games being barnstormed.
But my point is this. At their prime, no one, not even Oh matched Bonds best season out puts.
Bonds best .370, Oh's best .355
Bonds best HR 73(6.52 ab/hr), Oh's best 55 (8.58 ab/hr) also a year@49 total at 7.86 ab/hr. Both amazing but Bonds clearly better.
Bonds best RBI total 137(3.47 ab/rbi) Oh's best 124(3.48 ab/rbi) really close, but no cigar
Bond's best slugging% .863(a world record), Oh's best .761(this is a ridiculus #, but 102points lower)
Bonds best obp, an insane .609, Oh's best .527(only twice did he top .500 where as Bonds did it 4 times and was always close to .500 every year.
Bonds best steals total 52, Oh's best ( stats not kept so he must not have been much of a base stealer)
Bonds gold gloves 8, Oh's defense, I'm not sure but he probably wasn't as good.