P.o,t.^ 19th identical troll/spam/attack post.
Anyone want to discuss the topic...?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
P.o,t.^ 19th identical troll/spam/attack post.
Anyone want to discuss the topic...?
Yes, be very worried. These pimps are not monkeying around.Your posts are starting to make sense to me - I'm not sure if I should be worried!
P.o,t.#20!
Almost 21!
I can't tell you how much I appreciate someone actually discussing the topic.Yes, be very worried. These pimps are not monkeying around.
Can't see your posts as they are incoherent. What do you mean by housing? Be specific. Mansions? One room apartments? Hotel spaces?See my post above.
See my earlier posts.
Housing.
How bizarre - alleged incoherence causes selective blindness?Can't see your posts as they are incoherent.
Look it up.What do you mean by housing?
See above.Be specific.
One of Pelosi's?Mansions?
What do you think?One room apartments?
What are your thoughts?Hotel spaces?
Like I said. Troll. Answers questions with questions. Waste of life.How bizarre - alleged incoherence causes selective blindness?
Look it up.
See above.
One of Pelosi's?
Sure - why not?
Could house a LOT of people!
What do you think?
What are your thoughts?
Nonsense; the affordable housing crisis is affecting tens of millions of good, hardworking people; stop making excuses & avoiding reality.
Which tent are you posting from?
The troll assumes that the reason these people are "struggling" is due to bad luck vs bad decisions.From the one in the center, getting it ready for you.
It very well could be bad luck.The troll assumes that the reason these people are "struggling" is due to bad luck vs bad decisions.
This is an excellent question considering that the definition can and must mutate if H. sapiens is going to address the concepts of unaffordability and the very American concept of home ownership, a very American concept, by the way. When we mentioned tiny homes, we also meant modular structures that assemble and disassemble, each piece of which is always already (owned [italics]) by the owner and not the bank, right from the start. This by default means that these tiny/micro dwellings need not fall victim to the high-cost, predatory moving systems now in place for one-piece tinies and micros, a blatant rip-off.Can't see your posts as they are incoherent. What do you mean by housing? Be specific. Mansions? One room apartments? Hotel spaces?
I don't see much point in making the issue about personal virtue (or lack thereof). The question is whether we want to use government to provide us with housing. I think it's a really bad idea.
It's fine if it's temporary. Say a mother and child escaping an abusive relationship. But it cannot be and must not be permanentIt very well could be bad luck.
I don't see much point in making the issue about personal virtue (or lack thereof). The question is whether we want to use government to provide us with housing. I think it's a really bad idea.
Supply and Demand..no such thing as a rip off IMOThis is an excellent question considering that the definition can and must mutate if H. sapiens is going to address the concepts of unaffordability and the very American concept of home ownership, a very American concept, by the way. When we mentioned tiny homes, we also meant modular structures that assemble and disassemble, each piece of which is always already (owned [italics]) by the owner and not the bank, right from the start. This by default means that these tiny/micro dwellings need not fall victim to the high-cost, predatory moving systems now in place for one-piece tinies and micros, a blatant rip-off.
The troll assumes that the reason these people are "struggling" is due to bad luck vs bad decisions.
lol. Right-wingers only have a problem when the Poor may benefit. Corporate welfare is alive and well and has even paid multimillion dollar bonuses.The troll assumes that the reason these people are "struggling" is due to bad luck vs bad decisions.
Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can solve that dilemma in a market friendly manner.It very well could be bad luck.
I don't see much point in making the issue about personal virtue (or lack thereof). The question is whether we want to use government to provide us with housing. I think it's a really bad idea.