Gorsuch should withdraw from his nomination

[TheOldSchool]

You know what Gorsuch needs to believe? That he would be a good Justice.

What, you think he needs a pep talk or some shit? I swear, the modern GOP are ******* nuts.

Your utter panic and desperation are duly noted.

You really should calm down a bit. You're really going over the top. You'll have no place to go when President Trump makes his appointment to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Trump's Presidency will collapse long before Ginsburg does.

 

[hadit]

Lol. Good thing liberal loon merrick is no longer under consideration.

Hopefully he taught Democrats an important lesson. They can block and filibuster Gorsuch for at least 293 days, and possibly until the 2018 elections.

Only until the Republicans finish the job Reid started and do away with the filibustering and blustering.

Yep. Best case scenario for Democrats is that the rubes use the nuclear option. Then they can bash the GOP in the head with it politically for a few years and use it without consequence on a few justices when they're back in power.

It wouldn't be an effective club. Trump would get his nominees and the cherry would be to replace Buzzy with a sane justice.

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Hopefully he taught Democrats an important lesson. They can block and filibuster Gorsuch for at least 293 days, and possibly until the 2018 elections.

Only until the Republicans finish the job Reid started and do away with the filibustering and blustering.

Yep. Best case scenario for Democrats is that the rubes use the nuclear option. Then they can bash the GOP in the head with it politically for a few years and use it without consequence on a few justices when they're back in power.

It wouldn't be an effective club. Trump would get his nominees and the cherry would be to replace Buzzy with a sane justice.

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

 

[hadit]

Only until the Republicans finish the job Reid started and do away with the filibustering and blustering.

Yep. Best case scenario for Democrats is that the rubes use the nuclear option. Then they can bash the GOP in the head with it politically for a few years and use it without consequence on a few justices when they're back in power.

It wouldn't be an effective club. Trump would get his nominees and the cherry would be to replace Buzzy with a sane justice.

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

Wow, your emotional self-defense program has political impact in Washington.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Yep. Best case scenario for Democrats is that the rubes use the nuclear option. Then they can bash the GOP in the head with it politically for a few years and use it without consequence on a few justices when they're back in power.

It wouldn't be an effective club. Trump would get his nominees and the cherry would be to replace Buzzy with a sane justice.

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

Wow, your emotional self-defense program has political impact in Washington.

What a stupid thought for you to have

 

[hadit]

It wouldn't be an effective club. Trump would get his nominees and the cherry would be to replace Buzzy with a sane justice.

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

Wow, your emotional self-defense program has political impact in Washington.

What a stupid thought for you to have

Just working with what you gave me.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It would be very effective. Even more so when Trump gets implicated in Russian treason and republicans have to deal with the fallout of using the nuclear option to install a justice nominated by a criminal.

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

Wow, your emotional self-defense program has political impact in Washington.

What a stupid thought for you to have

Just working with what you gave me.

I doubt your working with much of anything

 

[hadit]

Hold on to that. I hear it helps.

It does. It helped destroy Trump's shit healthcare plan. The GOP hacks are already worrying about re-election.

Wow, your emotional self-defense program has political impact in Washington.

What a stupid thought for you to have

Just working with what you gave me.

I doubt your working with much of anything

On the contrary, you give me so much to work with that it's sometimes hard to pick which one's more fun.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The reasons behind another person recommending that you apply for the job are fairly irrelevant.

Unless you've been recommended as a means of pushing a wildly partisan agenda. Garland believed himself to be qualified. And he was, except one party chose partisan antics over the welfare of the nation. Now Democrats have no choice but to force Trump to nominate someone who was not his first choice for poisoning the Supreme Court.

No, there's no "unless" to what I said.

I'm sure Merrick Garland did believe himself to be qualified for the job. I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda. Noticeably, I never once suggested that Garland should withdraw his nomination because of that. I was perfectly okay with Garland continuing his pursuit of the office based on his belief that he was qualified to hold it. Doesn't mean I thought he should GET the job, but I had no problem with him seeking it.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

Why is it that leftists think being obtuse is a brilliantly clever debate tactic?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The op's head is more fucked than a passed out college freshman chick at a college frat party. The suggestion that Gorsuch withdraw is absurd.

No more so than the other shameless clowns that have already withdrawn or resigned as Trump's picks for office

It just burns you up to see Trump in the WH. Lol!

Absolutely. What a humiliation for our once proud nation.

"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H. L. Mencken

Right. Like America was a glorious nation under Obama. China would not even roll out the red carpet for him the last time he went there for a summit.

Yeah and now under the orange **** there are talks of trade wars and military wars against China. Haha MAGA HYUK HYUK HYUK

Just ignore those voices Snowflake.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

Why is it that leftists think being obtuse is a brilliantly clever debate tactic?

Maybe I should just call you ugly and a loser; the same debate style as the guy you voted to lead the nation.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

Why is it that leftists think being obtuse is a brilliantly clever debate tactic?

Maybe I should just call you ugly and a loser; the same debate style as the guy you voted to lead the nation.

I did? Prove it.

 

[LaDexter]

Charles Schumer should withdraw his claim that he is in any way an AMERICAN, give up his seat and move to the only country he cares about = ISRAEL.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

Why is it that leftists think being obtuse is a brilliantly clever debate tactic?

Maybe I should just call you ugly and a loser; the same debate style as the guy you voted to lead the nation.

I did? Prove it.

Okay let me send an e-mail to the White House real quick requesting a copy of Putin's report on how everybody voted.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'm also sure that Obama nominated as a means of pushing a wildly-partisan agenda.

Obama nominated him because that is the President's job. Like how the Senate's job, until recently because the GOP changed things, was to vote on the President's SC nominations.

Why is it that leftists think being obtuse is a brilliantly clever debate tactic?

Maybe I should just call you ugly and a loser; the same debate style as the guy you voted to lead the nation.

I did? Prove it.

Okay let me send an e-mail to the White House real quick requesting a copy of Putin's report on how everybody voted.

In other words, you have no idea how I voted. You just ASSumed.

You could just try paying some ******* attention, and not running your gums without clue one. I'm just sayin' . . .

 

[P@triot]

By remaining the nominee of a man who has no respect for the judicial branch of government, and of a party that spent 293 days completely de-legitimizing the process of replacing a SC justice.

I hate to break it to you snowflake - but whoever President Trump nominates will be (and I quote) "the nominee of a man who has no respect for the judicial branch of government" by your definition. So....how.....exactly....would it help for Gorsuch to withdrawal?!?

 

[P@triot]

By remaining the nominee of a man who has no respect for the judicial branch of government, and of a party that spent 293 days completely de-legitimizing the process of replacing a SC justice. He hasn't even spoken out against it. He's a dishonorable fraud.

Why do you require President Trump to have "respect for the judicial branch of government"?!? Trump won't be serving in the judicial branch. He's in the executive branch (where he will remain).

There are so many flaws in your "logic" here I don't even know where to begin. At the end of the day, it sounds to me like you're just butt-hurt over the realization that the Supreme Court will have another actual justice instead of a political activist for the Dumbocrat Party.

 

[sartre play]

Not going too happen