strollingbones
Diamond Member
tie verdicts simply allow lower court rulings to stand.....that is not working well for the conservatives....now is it...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The GOP is declaring the Supreme Court is irrelevant and has no interest in having a full court
The GOP is declaring the Supreme Court is irrelevant and has no interest in having a full court
Garland would have voted to allow forced union dues anyway, so what is the point?
The GOP is declaring the Supreme Court is irrelevant and has no interest in having a full court
Garland would have voted to allow forced union dues anyway, so what is the point?
My point is that Republicans are setting a precedent that says there is no urgency in filling Supreme Court vacancies
That waiting for a president from your party is the best strategy
i dont think is true...the ussc justices always seem more moderate once on the court....
Congress sets the number of seats of the Supreme Court by law. If they say there shall be 8 judges, then it's too bad if you don't like it.The GOP is declaring the Supreme Court is irrelevant and has no interest in having a full court
I doubt one would have been confirmed so early, there is a process. Chances are obama's pick would side with the other progessives so explain how it's a GOP loss.tie verdicts simply allow lower court rulings to stand.....that is not working well for the conservatives....now is it...