Google made large contributions to climate change deniers

Deplorable Yankee

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2019
16,401
15,274
2,415
DIXIE
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers


Fri 11 Oct 2019 02.00 EDT
Google has made “substantial” contributions to some of the most notorious climate deniers in Washington despite its insistence that it supports political action on the climate crisis.

Among hundreds of groups the company has listed on its website as beneficiaries of its political giving are more than a dozen organisations that have campaigned against climate legislation, questioned the need for action, or actively sought to roll back Obama-era environmental protections.

The list includes the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative policy group that was instrumental in convincing the Trump administration to abandon the Paris agreement and has criticised the White House for not dismantling more environmental rules.

Google is also listed as a sponsor for an upcoming annual meeting of the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella organisation that supports conservative groups including the Heartland Institute, a radical anti-science group that has chided the teenage activist Greta Thunberg for “climate delusion hysterics”.

The heartland institute...anti science radicals :777:

But environmental activists and other critics say that, for a company that purports to support global action on climate change, such tradeoffs are not acceptable.

Cherry!
And the lefttarded watermelons cry reeeeeeeeeeee
Read it all at the radical left wing guardian ....the publication that begs for spare change on every page
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers
 
Maybe they support both sides in a hope to increase a broader understanding based on science, in support of all different perspectives. Both legitimate as long as science is behind any results.
 
Maybe they support both sides in a hope to increase a broader understanding based on science, in support of all different perspectives. Both legitimate as long as science is behind any results.

You would hope
Well the globo homo elite actually do want us at each other's throats ...itll make crushing us easier ...or so they thinkk

This I dont know what to make of yet ....
 
Maybe they support both sides in a hope to increase a broader understanding based on science, in support of all different perspectives. Both legitimate as long as science is behind any results.

Not really "both" sides. The reality is that most of the hipster solutions won't work to reduce carbon. Many of them aggravate it like biomass.
 
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers


Fri 11 Oct 2019 02.00 EDT
Google has made “substantial” contributions to some of the most notorious climate deniers in Washington despite its insistence that it supports political action on the climate crisis.

Among hundreds of groups the company has listed on its website as beneficiaries of its political giving are more than a dozen organisations that have campaigned against climate legislation, questioned the need for action, or actively sought to roll back Obama-era environmental protections.

The list includes the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative policy group that was instrumental in convincing the Trump administration to abandon the Paris agreement and has criticised the White House for not dismantling more environmental rules.

Google is also listed as a sponsor for an upcoming annual meeting of the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella organisation that supports conservative groups including the Heartland Institute, a radical anti-science group that has chided the teenage activist Greta Thunberg for “climate delusion hysterics”.

The heartland institute...anti science radicals :777:

But environmental activists and other critics say that, for a company that purports to support global action on climate change, such tradeoffs are not acceptable.

Cherry!
And the lefttarded watermelons cry reeeeeeeeeeee
Read it all at the radical left wing guardian ....the publication that begs for spare change on every page
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers
Both sides are needed to uncover the truth. Without two sides, there is no debate.
 
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers


Fri 11 Oct 2019 02.00 EDT
Google has made “substantial” contributions to some of the most notorious climate deniers in Washington despite its insistence that it supports political action on the climate crisis.

Among hundreds of groups the company has listed on its website as beneficiaries of its political giving are more than a dozen organisations that have campaigned against climate legislation, questioned the need for action, or actively sought to roll back Obama-era environmental protections.

The list includes the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative policy group that was instrumental in convincing the Trump administration to abandon the Paris agreement and has criticised the White House for not dismantling more environmental rules.

Google is also listed as a sponsor for an upcoming annual meeting of the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella organisation that supports conservative groups including the Heartland Institute, a radical anti-science group that has chided the teenage activist Greta Thunberg for “climate delusion hysterics”.

The heartland institute...anti science radicals :777:

But environmental activists and other critics say that, for a company that purports to support global action on climate change, such tradeoffs are not acceptable.

Cherry!
And the lefttarded watermelons cry reeeeeeeeeeee
Read it all at the radical left wing guardian ....the publication that begs for spare change on every page
Revealed: Google made large contributions to climate change deniers
Because Google cares more about its shareholders than about climate change.

Complete list of all people in the world surprised by this:

you
 
Maybe they support both sides in a hope to increase a broader understanding based on science, in support of all different perspectives. Both legitimate as long as science is behind any results.
Duh the world is gonna blow up in 11 years but I will donate to not stopping this
 

Forum List

Back
Top