Good news everyone. PA poised to start their own forensic audit. MAGA

[theHawk]

Wonder why Dims are so afraid of audits? You might think they have something to hide.

I noticed they have yet to show how brave they are by auditing a place where Trump won.

Go for it. Guarantee the leftists there cheated too.
Better yet, go audit a city Trump had zero chance of winning, like San Francisco, Chicago or New York. I think you’ll find the the leftist cheated even though they know they don’t have to. Leftists are so brainwashed and afraid they can’t help themselves.

Trump is a lifelong cheat so he naturally thinks everyone is a cheater.

Cheated at what?

 

[Decus]

According to the linked story how much money will the legislature commit to the "audit"? My quick reading didn't notice any mention of a figure. If I was to take these audits seriously I'd check into a Harrisburg, PA news source in interest of how much of taxpayer dough these State Senators are willing to put forth on this silliness?

Money is no problem. Democrats are contemplating a huge spending spree:

Bernie Sanders seeks $6 trillion infrastructure package, which Senate Democrats are considering passing without the GOP

It is going to rain money. Enjoy.

.

States can't print money and must deal in real dollars. The feds aren't going to pay for any audits. So what's your point?

You seem to be fiscally conservative when you find government spending that you don't approve of. Don't worry about State spending or budget deficits, Bernie will see to it that mismanaged States get bailed out.

My point is that for all the crap government spends money on, these this ballot audits are a sensible investment in securing voter confidence in future elections.

.

 

[busybee01]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Documents/PADOS-RLA-WG-Year-2-Report-12-31-2020.pdf

Home

Home

www.media.pa.gov

What was wrong with this audit?

How many audits would be sufficient? 2,3,504256?

Or is it "however many it takes to agree with me?"

If the latter I have to say that keep on investigating something so you can get to a predetermined conclusion is a bad basis to investigate anything.

Sorry but a forensic audit is a REAL. Not counting the same ballots over and over.

There are 1000 libturd lawyers watching every molecule. So you don't have to worry about a preconcluded event. No matter how much you wish it, we want to know. WE deserve the right to know

If this happened to the libturds the whole country would be forensically audited and you know it

You believed Fauci so your credibility is zeroU

Maricopa County had 2 forensic audits prior to the one conducted now. It didn't stop the GOP from ordering a third. So I repeat. How many are sufficient?

As to my credibility. I'm not the one making unsupported claims. I'm asking you a very simple question.

Hell, I'll make it easy. Let's say another audit is conducted and it would come up with the same answer would you give up on the idea of election fraud?

I've already said that if this is clean Vegetable is a legit prez. But I feel if it was not, you would not do the same,,,,,lolol

Or would you. Now you need to answer that.

Show me the audits were forensic before? I don't recall that

https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/66843/SLI-Compliance-Forensic-Audit-Report?bidId=

 

[busybee01]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The Bolshevik Gov will veto it

It proves he has common sense.

 

[busybee01]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

All the evidence that was provided by Trump's attorneys was looked at. That is why the cases were dismissed.

 

[busybee01]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

 

[Blenda]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Documents/PADOS-RLA-WG-Year-2-Report-12-31-2020.pdf

Home

Home

www.media.pa.gov

What was wrong with this audit?

How many audits would be sufficient? 2,3,504256?

Or is it "however many it takes to agree with me?"

If the latter I have to say that keep on investigating something so you can get to a predetermined conclusion is a bad basis to investigate anything.

Sorry but a forensic audit is a REAL. Not counting the same ballots over and over.

There are 1000 libturd lawyers watching every molecule. So you don't have to worry about a preconcluded event. No matter how much you wish it, we want to know. WE deserve the right to know

If this happened to the libturds the whole country would be forensically audited and you know it

You believed Fauci so your credibility is zeroU

Maricopa County had 2 forensic audits prior to the one conducted now. It didn't stop the GOP from ordering a third. So I repeat. How many are sufficient?

As to my credibility. I'm not the one making unsupported claims. I'm asking you a very simple question.

Hell, I'll make it easy. Let's say another audit is conducted and it would come up with the same answer would you give up on the idea of election fraud?

I've already said that if this is clean Vegetable is a legit prez. But I feel if it was not, you would not do the same,,,,,lolol

Or would you. Now you need to answer that.

Show me the audits were forensic before? I don't recall that

https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/66843/SLI-Compliance-Forensic-Audit-Report?bidId=

You believed DR Fauci and aiding in destroying half the ******* world over nothing. You are meaningless

 

[forkup]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

Aguilera v. Fontes - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

The evidence was examined and found wanting enough to be dismissed pretrial in this case.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Same here.

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2020/docs/20201204_CourtOrderDismissingPetition.pdf

Here it was dismissed because of the fact that they filed so late the courts couldn't grant anything that would remedy the situation even if the complaint was valid.

Most of the lawsuits didn't assert any fraud. Those that did were dismissed for a variety of reasons, including looking at the available evidence and that evidence being found insufficient.

Granting a motion to dismiss is a statement by the judge that the lawsuit being presented is simply not valid. It in itself is a ruling and that ruling being made does not all of a sudden makes the complaint valid simply because a judge felt it didn't deserve the court's time.

 

[Blenda]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

Aguilera v. Fontes - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

The evidence was examined and found wanting enough to be dismissed pretrial in this case.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Same here.

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2020/docs/20201204_CourtOrderDismissingPetition.pdf

Here it was dismissed because of the fact that they filed so late the courts couldn't grant anything that would remedy the situation even if the complaint was valid.

Most of the lawsuits didn't assert any fraud. Those that did were dismissed for a variety of reasons, including looking at the available evidence and that evidence being found insufficient.

Granting a motion to dismiss is a statement by the judge that the lawsuit being presented is simply not valid. It in itself is a ruling and that ruling being made does not all of a sudden makes the complaint valid simply because a judge felt it didn't deserve the court's time.

You used Wikipedia as a source to prove you're right? LOL One of the founders of Wikipedia recently stated that it is nothing like he and his co-creater intended. That it's gone far left, that it has become rife with socialist views and is no longer credible.

Co-founder says Wikipedia’s neutrality ‘long gone,’ cites leftist bias

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is criticizing the site’s left-wing bias, saying the popular online encyclopedia has become an irretrievably broken platform for socialism.

m.washingtontimes.com

Next you'll quote CNN or the NYT and try to convince me they aren't biased either!

Way to go! You've really convinced me.... that you're brainwashed.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

Aguilera v. Fontes - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

The evidence was examined and found wanting enough to be dismissed pretrial in this case.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Same here.

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2020/docs/20201204_CourtOrderDismissingPetition.pdf

Here it was dismissed because of the fact that they filed so late the courts couldn't grant anything that would remedy the situation even if the complaint was valid.

Most of the lawsuits didn't assert any fraud. Those that did were dismissed for a variety of reasons, including looking at the available evidence and that evidence being found insufficient.

Granting a motion to dismiss is a statement by the judge that the lawsuit being presented is simply not valid. It in itself is a ruling and that ruling being made does not all of a sudden makes the complaint valid simply because a judge felt it didn't deserve the court's time.

You used Wikipedia as a source to prove you're right? LOL One of the founders of Wikipedia recently stated that it is nothing like he and his co-creater intended. That it's gone far left, that it has become rife with socialist views and is no longer credible.

Co-founder says Wikipedia’s neutrality ‘long gone,’ cites leftist bias

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is criticizing the site’s left-wing bias, saying the popular online encyclopedia has become an irretrievably broken platform for socialism.

m.washingtontimes.com

Next you'll quote CNN or the NYT and try to convince me they aren't biased either!

Way to go! You've really convinced me.... that you're brainwashed.

Lot of Wiki Diki and Factless Check quotes today

 

[Blenda]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

Aguilera v. Fontes - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

The evidence was examined and found wanting enough to be dismissed pretrial in this case.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Same here.

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2020/docs/20201204_CourtOrderDismissingPetition.pdf

Here it was dismissed because of the fact that they filed so late the courts couldn't grant anything that would remedy the situation even if the complaint was valid.

Most of the lawsuits didn't assert any fraud. Those that did were dismissed for a variety of reasons, including looking at the available evidence and that evidence being found insufficient.

Granting a motion to dismiss is a statement by the judge that the lawsuit being presented is simply not valid. It in itself is a ruling and that ruling being made does not all of a sudden makes the complaint valid simply because a judge felt it didn't deserve the court's time.

You used Wikipedia as a source to prove you're right? LOL One of the founders of Wikipedia recently stated that it is nothing like he and his co-creater intended. That it's gone far left, that it has become rife with socialist views and is no longer credible.

Co-founder says Wikipedia’s neutrality ‘long gone,’ cites leftist bias

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is criticizing the site’s left-wing bias, saying the popular online encyclopedia has become an irretrievably broken platform for socialism.

m.washingtontimes.com

Next you'll quote CNN or the NYT and try to convince me they aren't biased either!

Way to go! You've really convinced me.... that you're brainwashed.

Lot of Wiki Diki and Factless Check quotes today

It's quite amusing when the left uses "fact checkers" as a source. If they had a shred of critical thinking skills (which they obviously don't since they are leftists) they'd ask WHO is doing the fact checking. Such as: Leftist "news" sites, people employed by Facebook and Twitter, and a variety of other openly biased people/groups such as the SPLC.

I love how leftists think I take anything they say seriously. No matter how many times I flat out tell them I use them for my own personal amusement, they think they can convince they are "right."

 

[Clipper]

For some reason the Dirty Democrats terrorified of the audits lol
They will attempt to deny any cheating.
They will make excuses.
They will attempt to discredit it.
And, there will be millions of dumb Democrat Voters who will refuse to face reality.
They are like the OJ jury.
No amount of evidence can enlighten their prejudiced minds.

Democrats are terrified? Really, how so? Pointing out that these audits are an exercise in right wing insanity is not being terrified. Look, we've all seen & heard enough of MAGA bullshit fot the past few years & if we hear no more of it for the rest of our lives it'll be too soon. So lay off the mouth breathing bullshit & move on.

But have your fun with this PA audit if it makes you feel better

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

For some reason the Dirty Democrats terrorified of the audits lol
They will attempt to deny any cheating.
They will make excuses.
They will attempt to discredit it.
And, there will be millions of dumb Democrat Voters who will refuse to face reality.
They are like the OJ jury.
No amount of evidence can enlighten their prejudiced minds.

Democrats are terrified? Really, how so? Pointing out that these audits are an exercise in right wing insanity is not being terrified. Look, we've all seen & heard enough of MAGA bullshit fot the past few years & if we hear no more of it for the rest of our lives it'll be too soon. So lay off the mouth breathing bullshit & move on.

But have your fun with this PA audit if it makes you feel better

yep, dem voters are brainwashed cultist who will ignore reality

 

[Lastamender]

For some reason the Dirty Democrats terrorified of the audits lol
They will attempt to deny any cheating.
They will make excuses.
They will attempt to discredit it.
And, there will be millions of dumb Democrat Voters who will refuse to face reality.
They are like the OJ jury.
No amount of evidence can enlighten their prejudiced minds.

Democrats are terrified? Really, how so? Pointing out that these audits are an exercise in right wing insanity is not being terrified. Look, we've all seen & heard enough of MAGA bullshit fot the past few years & if we hear no more of it for the rest of our lives it'll be too soon. So lay off the mouth breathing bullshit & move on.

But have your fun with this PA audit if it makes you feel better

Trying to stop the audits in court is because they are not afraid? How does that work?

 

[AntonToo]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

What case are you citing where this supposed evidence was submitted and supposedly rejected?

Why did Barr, Trump's AG, who bent over backwards to change policy so that DOJ can actively look at these cases, say there was nothing? Also too cowardly?

Barr is a traitor, part of the swamp. If he was really a true patriot he would have dropped the hammer on those who committed sedition with the Russian hoax.

But you keep pretending like Barr is legit and not the swamp as a way to remain ignorant, that'll really show me!

Of course Barr is a traitor. Everyone who doesn't go along with "stolen election!" Trump is pumping his followers full of is a traitor.

And you actually have no idea what case was filed about "obvious PA fraud seen in a graph of votes", you are just sure it was, like you are sure it didn't get a fair hearing...right?

I get it, facts are scary to the indoctrinated mind. All you have to is look. But of course, if you ever used facts and educated yourself, how could you remain a brainwashed leftist moron?

"Biden is the most popular president ever!"

What facts?

You said that PA fraud was obvious and that it was chelleged in court but didn't get a fair hearing. Right?

I'm just asking you what case it was that you are sure happened and you can't answer. Why? Seems to me it's because you are full of shit and don't have your facts sorted out.

It wasn't actually allowed in court, it was shut down before the spend was allowed in court. You just put words in my mouth to prove your ignorance. I love how little you know about how our country works, it's hilarious!

Then you lecture me about getting facts wrong, I love it! Another leftist with zero self-awareness, I'm senssing a theme....

This right here is why I keep coming back to laugh at leftist twits like you! "I'm too dumb to understand how the courts work, that proves I'm right!"

Priceless!

That is a lie. The court examined the evidence that was provided by Trump's lawyers. You are the one who is ignorant. You are the one who knows nothing about how this country works.

You are the one who has no clue how the courts work. Trump's attorneys are the ones who must provide evidence.

How can the courts examine all the evidence if they never take up the case?

Keep believing lies, stupid!

Aguilera v. Fontes - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

The evidence was examined and found wanting enough to be dismissed pretrial in this case.

Bowyer v. Ducey - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Same here.

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2020/docs/20201204_CourtOrderDismissingPetition.pdf

Here it was dismissed because of the fact that they filed so late the courts couldn't grant anything that would remedy the situation even if the complaint was valid.

Most of the lawsuits didn't assert any fraud. Those that did were dismissed for a variety of reasons, including looking at the available evidence and that evidence being found insufficient.

Granting a motion to dismiss is a statement by the judge that the lawsuit being presented is simply not valid. It in itself is a ruling and that ruling being made does not all of a sudden makes the complaint valid simply because a judge felt it didn't deserve the court's time.

You used Wikipedia as a source to prove you're right? LOL One of the founders of Wikipedia recently stated that it is nothing like he and his co-creater intended. That it's gone far left, that it has become rife with socialist views and is no longer credible.

Co-founder says Wikipedia’s neutrality ‘long gone,’ cites leftist bias

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger is criticizing the site’s left-wing bias, saying the popular online encyclopedia has become an irretrievably broken platform for socialism.

m.washingtontimes.com

Next you'll quote CNN or the NYT and try to convince me they aren't biased either!

Way to go! You've really convinced me.... that you're brainwashed.

Lot of Wiki Diki and Factless Check quotes today

It's quite amusing when the left uses "fact checkers" as a source.

Is it more amusing than you talking out of your ass, unable to support ANYTHING?

You said there was a case where Trump administration claimed obvious fraud in PA, but somehow can't say which case filing it was, even after I showed you a full list of ALL of the cases that were filed in PA re. 2020 election.

Please STFU about "amusing" untill you get your head out of your ignorant ass.

 

[Lesh]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Documents/PADOS-RLA-WG-Year-2-Report-12-31-2020.pdf

Home

Home

www.media.pa.gov

What was wrong with this audit?

How many audits would be sufficient? 2,3,504256?

Or is it "however many it takes to agree with me?"

If the latter I have to say that keep on investigating something so you can get to a predetermined conclusion is a bad basis to investigate anything.

Sorry but a forensic audit is a REAL. Not counting the same ballots over and over.

There are 1000 libturd lawyers watching every molecule. So you don't have to worry about a preconcluded event. No matter how much you wish it, we want to know. WE deserve the right to know

If this happened to the libturds the whole country would be forensically audited and you know it

You believed Fauci so your credibility is zeroU

Well, its been 6 months and you have no proof yet.

Well we never had a forensic audit now have we dippy.

You believed Fauci and Schiff. You have 0 credibility

What does a “forensic audit” consist of?

I’ve never gotten a response to that...

 

[AntonToo]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Documents/PADOS-RLA-WG-Year-2-Report-12-31-2020.pdf

Home

Home

www.media.pa.gov

What was wrong with this audit?

How many audits would be sufficient? 2,3,504256?

Or is it "however many it takes to agree with me?"

If the latter I have to say that keep on investigating something so you can get to a predetermined conclusion is a bad basis to investigate anything.

Sorry but a forensic audit is a REAL. Not counting the same ballots over and over.

There are 1000 libturd lawyers watching every molecule. So you don't have to worry about a preconcluded event. No matter how much you wish it, we want to know. WE deserve the right to know

If this happened to the libturds the whole country would be forensically audited and you know it

You believed Fauci so your credibility is zeroU

Well, its been 6 months and you have no proof yet.

Well we never had a forensic audit now have we dippy.

You believed Fauci and Schiff. You have 0 credibility

What does a “forensic audit” consist of?

I’ve never gotten a response to that?

Bamboo ballot paper testing. Because China and all.

 

[Magnus]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

\

Hope springs eternal. At this point, trumptards have gone beyond pathetic. The world now just pities you guys.

Knock yourself out. In the end, (when it does finally end), we will be back where we started. Biden still the president and in the WH and Rump still the loser, picking his nose in Florida.

 

[bripat9643]

This will be the most glaring of the fraud states

Pennsylvania poised to begin Arizona-style election audit with subpoena power

Pennsylvania appears to be on the precipice of initiating an Arizona-style audit of the 2020 election.

news.yahoo.com

The woke turds must be peeing their pants.

That's wonderful! PA's fraud was so obvious the graph of the vote totals as they were added created a giant F for fraud.

If PA fraud was so obvious, why coudn't Trump and his horde of lawyers establish it in court? If it was so obvious why did Trump own DOJ AG named Barr state there was no serious fraud?

The only thing obvious is what you are saying is horseshit irreconcilable with reality.

Look at you pretending like evidence was actually reviewed instead of outright dismissed by a cowardly court.

My favorite part? You think your narrow view of a bigger picture is all there is, just adorable!

All the evidence that was provided by Trump's attorneys was looked at. That is why the cases were dismissed.

Horseshit.