bravoactual
bravoactual
- Thread starter
- #21
The Late Great George Carling on Abortion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reprehensible right – attempting to defend the indefensible.Yet another “Reeeeeeeeee” thread from batshit crazy lefties that need to sacrifice unborn babies for Satan.
The reprehensible right – attempting to defend the indefensible.
You consider killing your offspring "good guys"?A small win for the good guys.
Projecting for a "win"The reprehensible right – attempting to defend the indefensible.
As Right Wing Nut Jobs, fight with school boards for school age children wearing masks?You consider killing your offspring "good guys"?
What ever happened to a portion being a "hard or difficult" choice?
We really are in the PROPHESIED "Evil Days
The Late Great George Carling on Abortion.
That makes you pro-death. Thanks for clearing that upRWNJ's are pro birth
Why werent you forcing ineffective masks on school children during the flu season for the last 30 years since children have a higher risk of dying falling down the stairs than dying from this Democrat diseaseAs Right Wing Nut Jobs, fight with school boards for school age children wearing masks?
As the United States’ covid-19 death toll moves relentlessly beyond 200,000, data shows that only about 100 children and teenagers have died of the disease, a fatality rate that is drawing wonder from clinicians and increasing interest among researchers hoping to understand why
And also snitching on anyone who knows anyone who ever talked to anyone related to anyone who lives across the street from anyone who might have gone to elementary school with anyone who might be a cousin of anyone who might have ever said "hi" to anyone who ever visited DC and does NOT vote Democrat, cuz they might be insurrectionists!!!!!!!!!Snitching on those who gather without masks is ok though. Lol
As the United States’ covid-19 death toll moves relentlessly beyond 200,000, data shows that only about 100 children and teenagers have died of the disease, a fatality rate that is drawing wonder from clinicians and increasing interest among researchers hoping to understand why“You can’t call yourself a pro-life party if your policy goals are to allow the maximum number of people to die of COVID, including children
Correct. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.Nowhere in the "Teachiings" of Jesus, does he condemn Abortion. He never talks about Abortion. Period end of sentence.
He didnt talk about breathing either.Nowhere in the "Teachiings" of Jesus, does he condemn Abortion. He never talks about Abortion. Period end of sentence.
If I care enough to look into your posts, will I find out you dont believe in the "Christian" God, or any god, for that matter?Correct. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.
Exodus 21:22-25
In the Jewish Talmud, for the first 40 days, the fetus is onlky considered a fluid.
The more traditional Jewish Mishnah ( A collection of laws based on oral tradition, written down about 200 CE), which allows abortion in the case of hard labor, potentially life threatening labor, since the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child.
In both cases involving Christian and Jewish law, the mothers life takes precedence over that of the child.
The prolife crowd loses the religious argument in either case.
But none of that matters. The United States of America is a secular nation, of which no religious law has any precedence over societal law, regarding every citizens Constitutional right, to be free of any religious influence.
Exodus as a Pro Abortion DefenseCorrect. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.
Exodus 21:22-25
In the Jewish Talmud, for the first 40 days, the fetus is onlky considered a fluid.
The more traditional Jewish Mishnah ( A collection of laws based on oral tradition, written down about 200 CE), which allows abortion in the case of hard labor, potentially life threatening labor, since the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child.
In both cases involving Christian and Jewish law, the mothers life takes precedence over that of the child.
The prolife crowd loses the religious argument in either case.
But none of that matters. The United States of America is a secular nation, of which no religious law has any precedence over societal law, regarding every citizens Constitutional right, to be free of any religious influence.
What the NIV implies is that the child is born alive and that the penalty of life for life, eye for eye, etc. applies to the child as well as the mother. If injury comes to the child or the mother there will not just be a fine but life for life, eye for eye, etcIf men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life . . .
The Late Great George Carling on Abortion.
If I care enough to look into your posts, will I find out you dont believe in the "Christian" God, or any god, for that matter?
Funny how the anti-Gods feel capable of lecturing the Christian world on "true" Christianity. Pathetically funny, actually
Not anymore.....thanks to the likes of the Texas and Florida Man governors, childrens' hospitals are filling up. Really something for the Right to be proud of.Why werent you forcing ineffective masks on school children during the flu season for the last 30 years since children have a higher risk of dying falling down the stairs than dying from this Democrat disease
From the WP (a year ago)