GoDaddy Boots SS-Inspired Texas Snitch Site

The reprehensible right – attempting to defend the indefensible.
35D8B633-03A5-40A4-AAF1-749C38EBF837.png
 
You consider killing your offspring "good guys"?

What ever happened to a portion being a "hard or difficult" choice?

We really are in the PROPHESIED "Evil Days
As Right Wing Nut Jobs, fight with school boards for school age children wearing masks?
RWNJ's are pro birth, that's it.
No pre-natal or post-natal care, just pro birth, after that, they could give a fuck.
The Late Great George Carling on Abortion.


Carlin had these nut jobs figured out long ago.
 
As Right Wing Nut Jobs, fight with school boards for school age children wearing masks?
Why werent you forcing ineffective masks on school children during the flu season for the last 30 years since children have a higher risk of dying falling down the stairs than dying from this Democrat disease

From the WP (a year ago)

As the United States’ covid-19 death toll moves relentlessly beyond 200,000, data shows that only about 100 children and teenagers have died of the disease, a fatality rate that is drawing wonder from clinicians and increasing interest among researchers hoping to understand why
 
Last edited:
Snitching on those who gather without masks is ok though. Lol
And also snitching on anyone who knows anyone who ever talked to anyone related to anyone who lives across the street from anyone who might have gone to elementary school with anyone who might be a cousin of anyone who might have ever said "hi" to anyone who ever visited DC and does NOT vote Democrat, cuz they might be insurrectionists!!!!!!!!!
 
You can’t call yourself a pro-life party if your policy goals are to allow the maximum number of people to die of COVID, including children
As the United States’ covid-19 death toll moves relentlessly beyond 200,000, data shows that only about 100 children and teenagers have died of the disease, a fatality rate that is drawing wonder from clinicians and increasing interest among researchers hoping to understand why
 
Nowhere in the "Teachiings" of Jesus, does he condemn Abortion. He never talks about Abortion. Period end of sentence.
Correct. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.

Exodus 21:22-25

In the Jewish Talmud, for the first 40 days, the fetus is onlky considered a fluid.

The more traditional Jewish Mishnah ( A collection of laws based on oral tradition, written down about 200 CE), which allows abortion in the case of hard labor, potentially life threatening labor, since the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child.

In both cases involving Christian and Jewish law, the mothers life takes precedence over that of the child.

The prolife crowd loses the religious argument in either case.

But none of that matters. The United States of America is a secular nation, of which no religious law has any precedence over societal law, regarding every citizens Constitutional right, to be free of any religious influence.
 
Another thread wherein the faggots and deviants brag about their nazi-style censorship victories.

You go gurl!!!
 
Nowhere in the "Teachiings" of Jesus, does he condemn Abortion. He never talks about Abortion. Period end of sentence.
He didnt talk about breathing either.

Neither did He talk about driving a car. So by your leftist "logic" why ar you driving, sinner.

Good Allah you people look for any feeble excuse to excuse the murder you harbor in your hearts
 
Correct. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.

Exodus 21:22-25

In the Jewish Talmud, for the first 40 days, the fetus is onlky considered a fluid.

The more traditional Jewish Mishnah ( A collection of laws based on oral tradition, written down about 200 CE), which allows abortion in the case of hard labor, potentially life threatening labor, since the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child.

In both cases involving Christian and Jewish law, the mothers life takes precedence over that of the child.

The prolife crowd loses the religious argument in either case.

But none of that matters. The United States of America is a secular nation, of which no religious law has any precedence over societal law, regarding every citizens Constitutional right, to be free of any religious influence.
If I care enough to look into your posts, will I find out you dont believe in the "Christian" God, or any god, for that matter?

Funny how the anti-Gods feel capable of lecturing the Christian world on "true" Christianity. Pathetically funny, actually
 
Correct. The Christian bible mentions abortion in this way.

Exodus 21:22-25

In the Jewish Talmud, for the first 40 days, the fetus is onlky considered a fluid.

The more traditional Jewish Mishnah ( A collection of laws based on oral tradition, written down about 200 CE), which allows abortion in the case of hard labor, potentially life threatening labor, since the life of the mother takes precedence over that of the child.

In both cases involving Christian and Jewish law, the mothers life takes precedence over that of the child.

The prolife crowd loses the religious argument in either case.

But none of that matters. The United States of America is a secular nation, of which no religious law has any precedence over societal law, regarding every citizens Constitutional right, to be free of any religious influence.
Exodus as a Pro Abortion Defense

The RSV assumes that a "miscarriage" happens, and the fetus is born dead. This implies that the loss of the unborn is no "harm," because it says, "If there is a miscarriage and yet no harm follows . . ." It is possible for the blow to cause a miscarriage and yet not count as "harm" which would have to be recompensed life for life, eye for eye, etc.

This translation seems to put the unborn in the category of a non-person with little value. The fine which must be paid may be for the loss of the child. Money suffices. Whereas if "harm follows" (to the woman!) then more than money must be given. In that case it is life for life, etc.

But is this the right translation? The NIV does not assume that a miscarriage happened. The NIV translates the text like this:

If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life . . .
What the NIV implies is that the child is born alive and that the penalty of life for life, eye for eye, etc. applies to the child as well as the mother. If injury comes to the child or the mother there will not just be a fine but life for life, eye for eye, etc

 
If I care enough to look into your posts, will I find out you dont believe in the "Christian" God, or any god, for that matter?

Funny how the anti-Gods feel capable of lecturing the Christian world on "true" Christianity. Pathetically funny, actually

They repeat what they're told to; they're incapable of anything resembling study and thought.
 
Why werent you forcing ineffective masks on school children during the flu season for the last 30 years since children have a higher risk of dying falling down the stairs than dying from this Democrat disease

From the WP (a year ago)
Not anymore.....thanks to the likes of the Texas and Florida Man governors, childrens' hospitals are filling up. Really something for the Right to be proud of.
 

Forum List

Back
Top