God is black

It doesn't bother me that god doesn't exist. Therefore, a god that doesn't exist can't be black.:D

I didnt say it bothered you that god doesnt exist. I said it bothers you that he would be black if he did. Why else would you have posted on this thread?

God can't be black, since when does a black man run anything?

I told you it bothered you. You cant even make sense now. :lol:
 
God can't be black, since when does a black man run anything?

I told you it bothered you. You cant even make sense now. :redface:

No, it doesn't bother me that black men can't run anything. :lol:

We run things from this

snoop_dogg_wallpapers_pimp_02.jpg



All the way to the most powerful man on the planet. Your POTUS.

obama.jpg


I know that bothers you. :lol:
 
No, it doesn't bother me that black men can't run anything. :lol:

We run things from this

snoop_dogg_wallpapers_pimp_02.jpg



All the way to the most powerful man on the planet. Your POTUS.

obama.jpg


I know that bothers you. :lol:

Snoop is your example? :lol:
The second guy isn't black, he's mulatto.

Yes Black men having white women flocking to them is a great example of running the love game. Your POTUS calls himself Black not mulatto. You do realize with your recessive genes he cant be white don't you?
 
Obama has no power, he is an uncle tom front man for primarily white and jewish capitalists. Part of the Obama angle is to create the illusion of black political power and make sure black americans stay malleable house *******.

As for snoop dogg, lol.
 
Last edited:
Obama has no power, he is an uncle tom front man for primarily white and jewish capitalists. Part of the Obama angle is to create the illusion of black political power and make sure black americans stay malleable house *******.

As for snoop dogg, lol.

Asclepias is one of the malleable house ******* I mentioned.
 
Last edited:
We run things from this

snoop_dogg_wallpapers_pimp_02.jpg



All the way to the most powerful man on the planet. Your POTUS.

obama.jpg


I know that bothers you. :lol:

Snoop is your example? :lol:
The second guy isn't black, he's mulatto.

Yes Black men having white women flocking to them is a great example of running the love game. Your POTUS calls himself Black not mulatto. You do realize with your recessive genes he cant be white don't you?

The only white women blacks can get are the fat and ugly ones.
Obama can call himself Chinese, he's still mulatto. His black gene must be confusing him.:D
 
You went through all that trouble for nothing. I didnt call you out. I merely asked you a question. Dont jump the gun. I thought you had found a verse that stated the age of the world in the bible directly. The only thing I found is the that man was created on the 6th day making the earth 5 days older than man. We know thats false without determining the year. If you look at what the bible says about the number of generations for man and the supposed date of birth for jesus then you can calculate the age of the earth to be approximately 6k years. It takes some thinking but the information is definitely in the bible. The next time you try to match wits dont be so obvious. You arent smart enough to trick anyone. :lol:

Hi A
A. As for this 6,000 year timeline business,
the best interpretation that makes any sense to me is interpreting 1,000 years not literally
but meaning an "epoch" or period. Like the Iron or Bronze Age, Stone or Dark Ages.

B. the simplest way I can explain that the contents in the Bible are
symbolic and not literal, is that the Constitution and Natural Laws
are not written there. They are given to the Gentiles outside the Bible.

So if you take it "literally" that nothing can be changed or added, etc.,
does that mean leaving all the other history out? of course not.
So it makes no sense to take it literally as the "only laws" you are supposed to live by.

There is a reason the secular laws are given to Gentiles through
Buddhism, Constitutionalism and social sciences outside the Bible.

These systems are meant to check and balance each other
as equal and necessary COMPLEMENTS not opposites in conflict.

So this does not mean to "reject" one or the other as "either/or"
but to use the sacred scripture when establishing truth among the followers and leaders within the church context between members agreeing to rebuke by those laws,
and equally use natural and secular laws when addressing or redressing
people or issues in those contexts as well.

This tactic of divide and conquer by rejecting by finding flaws is OLD HAT.

By the time we understand enough to criticize a problem, we should be able to CORRECT it. So there is no reason to use a flaw or error to reject anyone or any group as a whole.

There are flaws errors and biases in all systems, does that mean we throw it all away?

It makes more sense to address and correct the problems WITHIN the groups that want to keep that system going that represents them as their cultural language and tradition.

Why waste time and words "justifying reasons we don't want to use a system"?

Why not invest in developing and reforming the systems we DO want to use?
 
Last edited:
OJ Simpson's wife was not fat or ugly.
Are you saying OJ is not really black
or his wife was not really white?

The only white women blacks can get are the fat and ugly ones.
Obama can call himself Chinese, he's still mulatto. His black gene must be confusing him.:D

For Obama, the best description I've heard for him is
"Halfrican American"

(As for myself, I think I must be "fake Chinese"
People think I look Chinese, but I'm not.
And I can't tell the different Asian ethnicities apart from each other
like other Asians can, so I may qualify as "fake Asian")

I am okay with people making fun of race and other people
to the same degree they are willing to make fun of themselves.
If the interaction is mutual, I think anything can be fair game
in the process of learning and understanding.

However, projecting and poking at others
while getting defensive when the finger is pointing the other way
tells me that person has internalized issues,
and is merely using other people to project them externally.

In that case, I think such issues are better addressed directly with the person,
and not pretend problems or conflicts are coming from outside.
 
Obama has no power, he is an uncle tom front man for primarily white and jewish capitalists. Part of the Obama angle is to create the illusion of black political power and make sure black americans stay malleable house *******.

As for snoop dogg, lol.

[MENTION=49627]RWHeathenGamer[/MENTION]

I agree with your basic criticism that the power pushed by Democrats like Obama
is based on enslaving by dependence on other people in govt
and not liberating people to be self governing which is
where real power and equal responsibility/rights comes from.

However, until people or leaders step up to fix the problem,
nobody seems to have enough influence or power to change this
paradigm and cycle of oppression that fuels govt waste and political exploitation
for corporate profit.

So that leaves us all "victims" whining and blaming others for these problems.

Can you find me people willing to correct the problems
instead of just blaming each other's groups and leaders?

Dr. Ben Carson spoke out on solutions that actually align with
Obama's similar ideas on microlending and education.

Why not support these men and other leaders to truly
break free from the political division and enslavement going on,
and work together to liberate the masses?

Whoever has THAT level of power to influence change,
I might call that having power.

Until then, I see a bunch of whining victims.

I tried to promote plans to bring together members and leaders
from all parties to save national historic property for Veterans
to teach independent self-government and business mgmt.

But people are more interested in raising millions of dollars
to run for office, instead of investing directly in building sustainable solutions
where people no longer NEED to depend on party leaders for representation.

So sad.

But you are right about the division between
"house negroes" and "field negroes" --
keeping the rich and poor divided by party, both blaming the other,
so they keep fighting each other while they are both slaves to politics.

Instead of using this to divide and enslave the Blacks,
which is still going on, those same party politics are
used for ALL people to divide by rich and poor,
instead of investing our combined resources directly in solving our own problems locally.
 

Forum List

Back
Top