Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The supreme court forced it on California..and they were the first state to recognize it. Only the anti gay ? religious freaks were against it. Its a legal issue, not a moral one.Even California said no to gay marriageWell the governments give us rights and takes them away.Well it is a funny thing. When you ask a godless Leftist if we have rights that empower the state to "help" people, they will spout off a bunch of rights, such as the right to health care, the right to abortions, the right to vote, etc.God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
However, if you try to mention rights of the individual that limit government power they will say that such rights don't really exist.
In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
But you already knew that
So see how you republicans like to act, like you are gods and gay marriage is not forced on anyone.
Its a legal issue, not a moral one.
If law is moral, then the issue is a moral one.
It can be said that law is not as moral as it will be, but we cannot say that it does not hold any morality.
Given that secular law is bringing more peace and law minding than religions, I would give it high marks for morality.
Thank God for laïcité.
Regards
DL
Abortion and the death penalty is barbaric, mans laws change like the wind
Please opine on this in terms of where the law must eventually go.
I will put my money on the notion that it is a fact that good people will inevitably demand and make good law.
Regards
DL
Huh? Even the ex govenors of Illinois a republican suspended the death penalty, when will the left wake up on abortion?
The supreme court forced it on California..and they were the first state to recognize it. Only the anti gay ? religious freaks were against it. Its a legal issue, not a moral one.Even California said no to gay marriageWell the governments give us rights and takes them away.Well it is a funny thing. When you ask a godless Leftist if we have rights that empower the state to "help" people, they will spout off a bunch of rights, such as the right to health care, the right to abortions, the right to vote, etc.God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
However, if you try to mention rights of the individual that limit government power they will say that such rights don't really exist.
In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
But you already knew that
So see how you republicans like to act, like you are gods and gay marriage is not forced on anyone.
Its a legal issue, not a moral one.
If law is moral, then the issue is a moral one.
It can be said that law is not as moral as it will be, but we cannot say that it does not hold any morality.
Given that secular law is bringing more peace and law minding than religions, I would give it high marks for morality.
Thank God for laïcité.
Regards
DL
Abortion and the death penalty is barbaric, mans laws change like the wind
Abortion is murder - from our literature:
Do You Value Life as God Does? — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
This is an authorized Web site of Jehovah’s Witnesses. It is a research tool for publications in various languages produced by Jehovah’s Witnesses.wol.jw.org
"Every human life is important to Jehovah. Even an unborn baby is precious to him. Under the Law of Moses, if a person accidentally hurt a pregnant woman and either she or her baby died, Jehovah held that person guilty of manslaughter. This meant that even though it was an accident, someone had been killed and the life had to be compensated for. (Read Exodus 21:22, 23.) To God, an unborn baby is a living person. Knowing that, how do you think he feels about abortion? How do you think he feels when he sees millions of unborn babies killed every year?"
Ex. 21: "soul for soul, life for life" - under the Mosaic Law not the law of Christ - Christians are not authorized to execute - but see "Romans 13:1-5" - Why do governments have the God-given right to "bear the sword?"
An unborn child is a human life. Life is one of the inalienable rights stated in OP.
Reading your themes I can observe that God gave you the right to hate Him.
And you have taken that right very seriously.
God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
The problem with government given rights, is that you assume this means the government will ensure those rights.
The problem is, if government is the only reason you have them, then government can deny you those rights whenever it pleases.
Throughout all human history, governments have proclaimed themselves to be benefactors, at a the exact same time as claiming to be benefactors, went about every method of abusing the public they claimed to be benefactors for.
Again, if your only rights are given to you by government, then government can take those rights away.
This is one of the huge schizophrenic aspects of left-wing ideology, generally speaking. They say that government regulation and control is fine, because the government is "us".
But then they'll turn right around and complain that politicians serve their own political interests, that corporations have influence, that government agencies all act according to their own values.
AOC being the mindless idiot she is, actually argued both of those. In one video she said "Government is us! Government is the public", and then in another attacked government regulators as having endless conflicts of interest. Wait, I thought government was "us"? It never ends with AOC, because she'll double talk every point she's ever made.
My point though, is that saying that government gave you those rights, implies that government has to power to give, and take, rights.
This is how all tyrannical governments exist. If they can give you a right, they can take it as well.
The United States was different, because we said government isn't the source of our rights. Government is merely to enforce the rights we already have.
In 1689, Locke argued in his Two Treatises of Government that political society existed for the sake of protecting "property", which he defined as a person's "life, liberty, and estate"
This is why it is vital that rights remain, not of government, but of our creator. Because the moment we put the power of determine what is or is not a right, in the hands of human government, humans will abuse that power, and deny rights when it is convenient to do so.
Rights cannot be given. They can only be taken.
Only the one who thinks a right exists can act upon it.
We have elected enforcers and without them to protect you, you can only take your rights to their limits unless you wish to come under the law.
You make your own rights and contribute to the system you need to protect them.
For the people, by the people.
Perhaps the only good phase in your constitution.
If you lived up to that, you would profit from your lousy constitution the way other free countrys have.
That is a shame. I like you goofs.
Regards
DL
If you lived up to that, you would profit from your lousy constitution the way other free countrys have.
I'm confused. We have the highest standard of living in the world today. Some of poorest working people, live better lives than those of the middle class of Europe.
A married couple working at McDonald's full time, has a combined income that places them in the top 1% of household income world wide.
A married couple doing team truck driving, places them in the top 1% of the top 1%, world wide.
We have a life style that the vast majority of people in this world, could only dream of.
So.... explain that comment again?
I'm confused. We have the highest standard of living in the world today. Some of poorest working people, live better lives than those of the middle class of Europe.
Yes, you are confused. The European live a lot better than we do now.
View attachment 337342
A married couple working at McDonald's full time, has a combined income that places them in the top 1% of household income world wide.
That's only because so much of the third world lives in grinding poverty. That's nothing to be happy about.
Only a declining empire worries about how it is living better than the "Barbarians"
life liberty and the pursuit of happiness !The rights people actually have are derived directly from the forbearance of the governments they live under.
I agree.
I take it that you would not sign the U.S. constitution as written. Right?
Regards
DL
I'm confused. We have the highest standard of living in the world today. Some of poorest working people, live better lives than those of the middle class of Europe.
Yes, you are confused. The European live a lot better than we do now.
View attachment 337342
A married couple working at McDonald's full time, has a combined income that places them in the top 1% of household income world wide.
That's only because so much of the third world lives in grinding poverty. That's nothing to be happy about.
Only a declining empire worries about how it is living better than the "Barbarians"
Thanks for trying to educate this guy.
I hope he has more than what he has shown.
Regards
DL
The supreme court forced it on California..and they were the first state to recognize it. Only the anti gay ? religious freaks were against it. Its a legal issue, not a moral one.Even California said no to gay marriageWell the governments give us rights and takes them away.Well it is a funny thing. When you ask a godless Leftist if we have rights that empower the state to "help" people, they will spout off a bunch of rights, such as the right to health care, the right to abortions, the right to vote, etc.God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
However, if you try to mention rights of the individual that limit government power they will say that such rights don't really exist.
In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
But you already knew that
So see how you republicans like to act, like you are gods and gay marriage is not forced on anyone.
Its a legal issue, not a moral one.
If law is moral, then the issue is a moral one.
It can be said that law is not as moral as it will be, but we cannot say that it does not hold any morality.
Given that secular law is bringing more peace and law minding than religions, I would give it high marks for morality.
Thank God for laïcité.
Regards
DL
Abortion and the death penalty is barbaric, mans laws change like the wind
Please opine on this in terms of where the law must eventually go.
I will put my money on the notion that it is a fact that good people will inevitably demand and make good law.
Regards
DL
Huh? Even the ex govenors of Illinois a republican suspended the death penalty, when will the left wake up on abortion?
I see no relevance to my question.
When will the right grant women the same rights it grants men.
Regards
DL
Your own link, proves my point.
The supreme court forced it on California..and they were the first state to recognize it. Only the anti gay ? religious freaks were against it. Its a legal issue, not a moral one.Even California said no to gay marriageWell the governments give us rights and takes them away.Well it is a funny thing. When you ask a godless Leftist if we have rights that empower the state to "help" people, they will spout off a bunch of rights, such as the right to health care, the right to abortions, the right to vote, etc.God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
However, if you try to mention rights of the individual that limit government power they will say that such rights don't really exist.
In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
But you already knew that
So see how you republicans like to act, like you are gods and gay marriage is not forced on anyone.
Its a legal issue, not a moral one.
If law is moral, then the issue is a moral one.
It can be said that law is not as moral as it will be, but we cannot say that it does not hold any morality.
Given that secular law is bringing more peace and law minding than religions, I would give it high marks for morality.
Thank God for laïcité.
Regards
DL
Abortion and the death penalty is barbaric, mans laws change like the wind
Please opine on this in terms of where the law must eventually go.
I will put my money on the notion that it is a fact that good people will inevitably demand and make good law.
Regards
DL
Huh? Even the ex govenors of Illinois a republican suspended the death penalty, when will the left wake up on abortion?
I see no relevance to my question.
When will the right grant women the same rights it grants men.
Regards
DL
What "right" do they not have right now?
We're not worrying about how we are living better than the barbarians. We're not worried at all.
Maybe you are.... but that's because you are foolish, and don't realize how good you have it.
Actually, what I know is that we are in decline and not taking care of our people. That we've been brought to near complete collapse by a flu with an attitude tells me how bad off we are.
The supreme court forced it on California..and they were the first state to recognize it. Only the anti gay ? religious freaks were against it. Its a legal issue, not a moral one.Even California said no to gay marriageWell the governments give us rights and takes them away.Well it is a funny thing. When you ask a godless Leftist if we have rights that empower the state to "help" people, they will spout off a bunch of rights, such as the right to health care, the right to abortions, the right to vote, etc.God given rights. Do you really have any?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a right is given to us by governments, they assume and have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. If governments do not accept and do this enforcement duty, then citizens have a corrupted government.
If a right is given to a soul, by god, he would have a duty to ensure that they are never taken from us. The fact that they often are, indicates that he is shirking his duty.
To me, rights are like laws, completely useless and worthless unless they can be enforced by a given power when they are breached.
Do you have any real god given rights, or are god given rights just a feel-good lie that we tell ourselves we have so as to ignore that we have none?
Regards
DL
However, if you try to mention rights of the individual that limit government power they will say that such rights don't really exist.
In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
But you already knew that
So see how you republicans like to act, like you are gods and gay marriage is not forced on anyone.
Its a legal issue, not a moral one.
If law is moral, then the issue is a moral one.
It can be said that law is not as moral as it will be, but we cannot say that it does not hold any morality.
Given that secular law is bringing more peace and law minding than religions, I would give it high marks for morality.
Thank God for laïcité.
Regards
DL
Abortion and the death penalty is barbaric, mans laws change like the wind
Please opine on this in terms of where the law must eventually go.
I will put my money on the notion that it is a fact that good people will inevitably demand and make good law.
Regards
DL
Huh? Even the ex govenors of Illinois a republican suspended the death penalty, when will the left wake up on abortion?
I see no relevance to my question.
When will the right grant women the same rights it grants men.
Regards
DL
What "right" do they not have right now?
Equality to men.
I adlib.
He will rule over you sound familiar? How about remain silent in church and do not dare teach men anything.
Regards
DL
Oh good grief....
First off, this country became the country it is by each individual owning responsibility for himself.
I have never once, in all the down and painful times in my life, thought.... "uh... society isn't taking care of me!"
20% unemployment. Riots in the streets. Um, yeah, we are in very bad shape right now"near complete collapse"...? Really? This is near complete collapse? This is? Right now?
Based on what. What evidence do you have that we are near complete collapse?
I went to the story, every single shelf was stocked. I drove by the retail district, and nearly every single store had people staffing them, and people making purchases in them.
Venezuela is near complete collapse. That picture isn't just one isle for toilet paper, that's every single isle in the store. No meat. No bread. No sugar. Not even coffee, in a country known for coffee.
Look at all those people. You can tell how they are all preparing for the doom of the "near complete collapse" of the US.
Oh good grief....
First off, this country became the country it is by each individual owning responsibility for himself.
I have never once, in all the down and painful times in my life, thought.... "uh... society isn't taking care of me!"
Again, check your privilege, buddy.
20% unemployment. Riots in the streets. Um, yeah, we are in very bad shape right now"near complete collapse"...? Really? This is near complete collapse? This is? Right now?
Based on what. What evidence do you have that we are near complete collapse?
I went to the story, every single shelf was stocked. I drove by the retail district, and nearly every single store had people staffing them, and people making purchases in them.
Venezuela is near complete collapse. That picture isn't just one isle for toilet paper, that's every single isle in the store. No meat. No bread. No sugar. Not even coffee, in a country known for coffee.
We've also been making economic war on them for the last 20 years, because they picked a form of government we don't like. We turned into Venezuela in a couple of weeks...
Look at all those people. You can tell how they are all preparing for the doom of the "near complete collapse" of the US.
Look at these people.
View attachment 342609
We're fucked.
Well the governments give us rights and takes them away.
And the republicans think they have a right to own a gun or rifle (without background checks) and do mass shootings, and the republicans think they have a right who can get married, and who gets healthcare or not.
See how that works.
Wow, what a fabulously ignorant post.
Kudos!
We did that to ourselves, with a pointless and useless lock down. Sweden didn't do that, and they are fine. Japan didn't do that, and they are fine.
People are at the beach, the weather is warm. Chill. For real... there is nothing to be freaking out about.
End the lock down.
As far as the economic war you guys have made up... just factually.. you are wrong. We didn't cause an economic war on Venezuela.
hink about this.... how did they not have coffee in Venezuela, a country known for coffee? How does our "economic war" on Venezuela, prevent coffee farmers from delivering coffee beans to their own stores, from their own farms? You think a massive group of Americans were wandering around Venezuela, stopping coffee bean shipments? Really?
It was Hugo Chavez seizing stores, sending the army to confiscate farms, and putting in place price controls and minimum wage laws, so that farmers couldn't possibly make a profit, the resulted in them not even being able to have coffee in a land known for coffee.
What specific "right" do women in our society not have?
What specific "right" do women in our society not have?
The right to be treated equally to men.
Have you heard of pink products?
Try Bic razors as an example. The blue ones for men are priced lower that the identical pink one for women.
Further.
Regards
DL
What specific "right" do women in our society not have?
The right to be treated equally to men.
Have you heard of pink products?
Try Bic razors as an example. The blue ones for men are priced lower that the identical pink one for women.
Further.
Regards
DL
First, I asked what "right" you don't have, that men do have.
We can't buy a pink razor for the same prices as a regular razor either. If the razors are actually identical, you can buy the regular razor that isn't pink.
And where in the constitution does it say "right to buy pink products for the same price as non-pink products"? What "right" do you think you are being denied here?
What right do you have to have a movie made for you? Do you have the right to force others to watch movies they don't like?
None of the things you implied here, are rights.
Let's talk about the pink razor by bic.
Men’s Razors Vs Women’s Razors: What’s The Diff?
Why do some women swear by men's razors? Why are women's razors even different from men's at all. We got the inside scoop from a celeb dermatologist.www.besthealthmag.ca
Women's razors are not identical. In fact, they are subtly very different, in ways that make the razor more expensive.
Remember, men typically only shave the face. Women tend to shave other areas, which requires more care. While it may appear from the outside that they are similar, or identical, they are often very different.
Regardless, I still ask the question, what actual right, do women not have?