Go Fund Me took the Canadian truckers money and will be giving it to their approved charities.

[SassyIrishLass]

They tried to steal the money and give it to a charity of their choice but got in a pickle

They fugged themselves

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They fugged themselves

Tomorrow morning at GoFundMe HQ....well we fucked up

 

[pknopp]

They tried to steal the money and give it to a charity of their choice but got in a pickle

If they did something previously from the articles posted, I have no idea. I commented on the articles posted.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

LOL, you sign an agreement with entity you partner with. Why is it you want the government to be able to step in and over ride an agreement two people voluntarily entered in to?

Negative. No one on the side of the Freedom Convoy or the donors agreed to have their money allocated to a charity other than the one they designated.

Businesswise, ethically, the very least GFM should do is close down the account to further donations and disburse the funds to the group they agreed to disburse to.

It’s one thing to cite agreements on the part of the person who started the account but GFM made an agreement too and they should be held to it. They agreed to accept, hold and disburse the funds to the Freedom Convoy. They don’t get to change the rules after they’ve already accepted nine million dollars because they’re concerned about violence that may or may not even be committed by the designated recipients.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Negative. No one on the side of the Freedom Convoy or the donors agreed to have their money allocated to a charity other than the one they designated.

Businesswise, ethically, the very least GFM should do is close down the account to further donations and disburse the funds to the group they agreed to disburse to.

It’s one thing to cite agreements on the part of the person who started the account but GFM made an agreement too and they should be held to it. They agreed to accept, hold and disburse the funds to the Freedom Convoy. They don’t get to change the rules after they’ve already accepted nine million dollars because they’re concerned about violence that may or may not even be committed by the designated recipients.

The entire fiasco is BS

 

[pknopp]

Negative. No one on the side of the Freedom Convoy or the donors agreed to have their money allocated to a charity other than the one they designated.

They may not have but GFM didn't steal it. They offered to refund or give to a charity the truckers picked out. When that didn't work out, they are refunding all of it.

Businesswise, ethically, the very least GFM should do is close down the account to further donations and disburse the funds to the group they agreed to disburse to.

That both agreed would not happen if there was violence involved.

It’s one thing to cite agreements on the part of the person who started the account but GFM made an agreement too and they should be held to it. They agreed to accept, hold and disburse the funds to the Freedom Convoy. They don’t get to change the rules after they’ve already accepted nine million dollars because they’re concerned about violence that may or may not even be committed by the designated recipients.

No rules were changed. The agreement clearly spells out the violence and illegal activity disclaimers.

 

[progressive hunter]

If they did something previously from the articles posted, I have no idea. I commented on the articles posted.

you lied about the article posted,,

 

[progressive hunter]

They may not have but GFM didn't steal it. They offered to refund or give to a charity the truckers picked out. When that didn't work out, they are refunding all of it.




That both agreed would not happen if there was violence involved.




No rules were changed. The agreement clearly spells out the violence and illegal activity disclaimers.

youre lying again,,

why do you keep doing that??

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

They may not have but GFM didn't steal it. They offered to refund or give to a charity the truckers picked out. When that didn't work out, they are refunding all of it.

They should have offered the refund from the beginning. They’re only doing so now because of the backlash.

They had no legal, moral or ethical standing to impose a choice on the truckers or the donors to choose a charity. The money never belonged to GFM so they had no right to make that sort of demand.

That both agreed would not happen if there was violence involved.

Irrelevant. If they cannot prove that the truckers themselves were involved in any violence then they were obligated to disburse the funds as agreed.

No rules were changed. The agreement clearly spells out the violence and illegal activity disclaimers.

Even if they were justified in taking action due to the violence, I’m sure that nothing in the agreement included GFM arbitrarily deciding what to do with the funds after the fact other than full disbursement to the Freedom Convoy as agreed, or full refunds to all donors.

Even if they did not keep the money, anything other than these two options would have amounted to theft.

 

[pknopp]

They should have offered the refund from the beginning. They’re only doing so now because of the backlash.

Maybe so. From the time I participated they were offering to refund.

They had no legal, moral or ethical standing to impose a choice on the truckers or the donors to choose a charity. The money never belonged to GFM so they had no right to make that sort of demand.


Irrelevant. If they cannot prove that the truckers themselves were involved in any violence then they were obligated to disburse the funds as agreed.


Even if they were justified in taking action due to the violence, I’m sure that nothing in the agreement included GFM arbitrarily deciding what to do with the funds after the fact other than full disbursement to the Freedom Convoy as agreed, or full refunds to all donors.

Even if they did not keep the money, anything other than these two options would have amounted to theft.

They gave the truckers the option of picking a charity or giving a refund in the article I commented on. Nothing was stolen.

 

[progressive hunter]

Maybe so. From the time I participated they were offering to refund.



They gave the truckers the option of picking a charity or giving a refund in the article I commented on. Nothing was stolen.

once again you are lying by omission,,

why wont you say the entire statement by GFM???

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Maybe so. From the time I participated they were offering to refund.



They gave the truckers the option of picking a charity or giving a refund in the article I commented on. Nothing was stolen.

Again, it was never their money to decide what was to be done with it. It was not their place to give the choice to the truckers to give it to a charity or anything else.

They had two legal/ethical options:

1.) Disburse the funds to the intended recipients. Or

2.) Give it back to the donors.

That’s it.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Hilarious! You Vax Cultists spend ever second 7/24 worrying about catching the manmade ChiCom Flu. Even see you Karens driving around alone wearing a mask. Pure entertainment!

Yes, hilarious, moron.
I stated before I'm not worried, I'm VACCINATED against the Trump flu.

Entertainment is going to be when you self proclaimed "stand on your own two feet, no government handouts for me", have to start paying for yourselves, when you end up in the hospital or on a ventilator.
The government and insurance are gonna stop paying for the unvaxxed.
Then the real whining/begging will start.

 

[pknopp]

Again, it was never their money to decide what was to be done with it. It was not their place to give the choice to the truckers to give it to a charity or anything else.

They had two legal/ethical options:

1.) Disburse the funds to the intended recipients. Or

2.) Give it back to the donors.

That’s it.

You can't mention business and ethics in the same post.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yes, hilarious, moron.
I stated before I'm not worried, I'm VACCINATED against the Trump flu.

Entertainment is going to be when you self proclaimed "stand on your own two feet, no government handouts for me", have to start paying for yourselves, when you end up in the hospital or on a ventilator.
The government and insurance are gonna stop paying for the unvaxxed.
Then the real whining/begging will start.

Yeah, that’s why you cultists spend 7/24 worrying about people who haven’t joined your cult yet.

Have you had the polio vaccination?
I don’t care!
You know why?
I’ve been vaccinated and will not catch and spread polio.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yeah, that’s why you cultists spend 7/24 worrying about people who haven’t joined your cult yet.

No, we just expose out the vaccine BS, that the Trump cult regurgitates.
I could give a crap whether your cult ever gets vaxxed.
Your cult deserves what you get, no sympathy.

Have you had the polio vaccination?

Yes.
4 times.

Children in the United States receive inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to protect against polio, or poliomyelitis. IPV is given by injection in the leg or arm, depending the person’s age. It may be given at the same time as other vaccines.

Children get four doses of IPV, with one dose at each of these ages:

• 2 months
• 4 months
• 6 through 18 months
• 4 through 6 years

Trumptards whine about booster shots.
They must not work.

I don’t care!
You know why?
I’ve been vaccinated and will not catch and spread polio.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yes, hilarious, moron.
I stated before I'm not worried, I'm VACCINATED against the Trump flu.

And you can still get and spread COVID

Some vaccine

 

[OldFlame]

GFM returned the money to the donors. Nothing was re-directed.

The funds should have been given to the cause that they were intended to go to. I hope they’re ruined after this, anyone that wants to play politics should not be involved in charitable donations.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

And you can still get and spread COVID

Some vaccine

So, you can still get the flu, after receiving the flu shot.
Don't read or hear Trumptards whining about that.

Then, again, they don't know how vaccines work.

 

[pknopp]

The funds should have been given to the cause that they were intended to go to. I hope they’re ruined after this, anyone that wants to play politics should not be involved in charitable donations.

It's sad that you only see this in terms of politics. GFM says they will not fund anything that creates violence or illegal activities. I'm not sure what that has to do with politics.