Go Fund Me took the Canadian truckers money and will be giving it to their approved charities.

[SassyIrishLass]

So, you can still get the flu, after receiving the flu shot.
Don't read or hear Trumptards whining about that.

Then, again, they don't know how vaccines work.

You're vaxed, don't worry about what others do

How's that?

 

[iceberg]

What the **** are you talking about?

I was just responding as to why the political left isn’t supportive of these guys.

You really need to take a breather. You’re getting batshit crazy always looking to be attacked and just wanting to fight.

no I point out your hypocrisy and you don't like that.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You're vaxed, don't worry about what others do

How's that?

Spread vaccine BS.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Spread vaccine BS.

You're still a spreader, vaxed one.

Now run along

 

[OldFlame]

It's sad that you only see this in terms of politics. GFM says they will not fund anything that creates violence or illegal activities. I'm not sure what that has to do with politics.

They’re leftists. Their platform was used to raise money for BLM in various ways. 90 million was donated just for use in posting bail on GFM and other lefty donation sites like Act Blue. Act Blue is specific for leftist ‘causes’, it’s all about donating to Dems, goes right into their pockets. That’s one way that the left has far outperformed conservatives, they work hard to get their narrative out there, by buying media and tech to show and support only their side.

 

[pknopp]

They’re leftists. Their platform was used to raise money for BLM in various ways. 90 million was donated just for use in posting bail on GFM and other lefty donation sites like Act Blue. Act Blue is specific for leftist ‘causes’, it’s all about donating to Dems, goes right into their pockets. That’s one way that the left has far outperformed conservatives, they work hard to get their narrative out there, by buying media and tech to show and support only their side.

Call them hypocritical if you wish but raising bail is not illegal.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So, you can still get the flu, after receiving the flu shot.
Don't read or hear Trumptards whining about that.

Then, again, they don't know how vaccines work.

Do you understand that this dangerous, experimental mRNA shit is NOT the same thing as genuine legitimate vaccines?

The reason that you can get the flu after having a flu vaccine is that like most viruses, influenza mutates so that the strain that you later get is not the same as the strain from which the vaccine that you took was made; different enough that the vaccine no longer protects against it. Once you've had a certain strain of influenza, or been vaccinated against it, you can never get that strain again, and you can never spread it to others. But that protection doesn't apply to strains far enough mutated from the strains against which you have antibodies.

The reason that you can get (and spread) COVID-1984 after being “vaccinated” against it is that this dangerous mRNA shit doesn't work.

 

[colfax_m]

no I point out your hypocrisy and you don't like that.

You’re making up shit about me to be angry about.

But feel free to ignore the hypocrisy on the right. It’s expected for you to do so. You’re not the kind of person you pretend to be.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

You can't mention business and ethics in the same post.

So are you saying that GFM, as a business, is inherently unethical? If so, why are you arguing in favor of their actions? If not, what’s your point?

 

[pknopp]

So are you saying that GFM, as a business, is inherently unethical? If so, why are you arguing in favor of their actions? If not, what’s your point?

Just because I do not support something is not an excuse to lie about it.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Just because I do not support something is not an excuse to lie about it.

That doesn’t answer the question: Are you saying GFM is unethical as a business? Are you saying they’re guilty of unethical business practices? Or is it more general in that the business of conducting business is inherently unethical?

 

[pknopp]

That doesn’t answer the question: Are you saying GFM is unethical as a business? Are you saying they’re guilty of unethical business practices? Or is it more general in that the business of conducting business is inherently unethical?

I'm simply saying I would never use them. Too many unhappy stories about them.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Yes, hilarious, moron.
I stated before I'm not worried, I'm VACCINATED against the Trump flu.

Entertainment is going to be when you self proclaimed "stand on your own two feet, no government handouts for me", have to start paying for yourselves, when you end up in the hospital or on a ventilator.
The government and insurance are gonna stop paying for the unvaxxed.
Then the real whining/begging will start.

So much for universal healthcare.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I'm simply saying I would never use them. Too many unhappy stories about them.

That’s fine but you did not specify GFM in regards to ethics and business. You simply said the words “business” and “ethics” shouldn’t be used in the same sentence. Hence, the confusion.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You're still a spreader, vaxed one.

Now run along

So are you, unvaxxed one.
At least I won't be "running along" to the hospital or morgue.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So much for universal healthcare.

This is funny.

February 7 2022
Former “Hercules” star Kevin Sorbo attempted to troll those danged libs on Monday with a tweet about COVID-19 vaccines, but it backfired badly.

That’s because many people with the opposite of Sorbo’s politics actually agreed with his tweet ― even though it wasn’t the point he was trying to make.

It all started when the ’90s-era TV star and outspoken conservative asked rhetorically why the COVID-19 vaccines have been free when other medical necessities cost money.

If the shots were given away for free because they’re life-saving, why isn’t insulin free? Chemotherapy? Epipens?
— Kevin Sorbo (@ksorbs) February 7, 2022

It appears as though Sorbo likes universal healthcare.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

This is funny.

February 7 2022
Former “Hercules” star Kevin Sorbo attempted to troll those danged libs on Monday with a tweet about COVID-19 vaccines, but it backfired badly.

That’s because many people with the opposite of Sorbo’s politics actually agreed with his tweet ― even though it wasn’t the point he was trying to make.

It all started when the ’90s-era TV star and outspoken conservative asked rhetorically why the COVID-19 vaccines have been free when other medical necessities cost money.



It appears as though Sorbo likes universal healthcare.

Irrelevant. The thing with Sorbo has nothing to do with my point.

The battle cry for proponents of universal healthcare is that everyone has a right to healthcare. Yet here you are suggesting that the unvaxed be denied a right they would and should share with everyone else.

Either healthcare is a right or it is not. You can’t have it both ways.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Irrelevant. The thing with Sorbo has nothing to do with my point.

YES, it does.
The vaccination is free...............................for now.
Sorbo suggested every shot/treatment should be free but they aren't.

The battle cry for proponents of universal healthcare is that everyone has a right to healthcare.

No, it isn't.
Everyone right now, has a right to healthcare..........Affording it?
Not so much.

Yet here you are suggesting that the unvaxed be denied a right they would and should share with everyone else.

That's right, proponents of for-profit healthcare, who don't want to prevent a disease or virus by getting a free shot, should pay, out of pocket, for their treatment.
You can't have it both ways.

Either healthcare is a right or it is not. You can’t have it both ways.

I'm not.
I stated before, everyone has a right to healthcare.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

YES, it does.
The vaccination is free...............................for now.
Sorbo suggested every shot/treatment should be free but they aren't.

It still has nothing to do with my point.

No, it isn't.

Yes it is. It might not be your battle cry but it’s definitely one I’ve heard before.

Everyone right now, has a right to healthcare..........Affording it?
Not so much.

Okay then, so if everyone has a right to healthcare then how would that work if they denied healthcare to unvaxed?

That's right, proponents of for-profit healthcare, who don't want to prevent a disease or virus by getting a free shot, should pay, out of pocket, for their treatment.

This would essentially mean that healthcare is not a right or universal, it’s a reward for obeying the government.

You can't have it both ways.

If healthcare were universal, it means precisely that.

I'm not.
I stated before, everyone has a right to healthcare.

But not everyone has a right to universal or government-funded healthcare, right?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It still has nothing to do with my point.


Yes it is. It might not be your battle cry but it’s definitely one I’ve heard before.


Okay then, so if everyone has a right to healthcare then how would that work if they denied healthcare to unvaxed?

Some doctors have already stopped seeing patients that are unvaxxed.

They won't deny treatment they just wont pay for it.

This would essentially mean that healthcare is not a right

Yes it is.
They aren't denying treatment.

or universal, it’s a reward for obeying the government.

Well, you get a reward for obeying facebook, twitter, Carlson, Hannity, Rogan or whomever too....................a bill.

If healthcare were universal, it means precisely that.

No, it doesn't.
Universal is one way.
Paying out of pocket is not universal.

But not everyone has a right to universal or government-funded healthcare, right?

Correct.
You didn't state that before.

"Either healthcare is a right or it is not. You can’t have it both ways".