Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,159
- 198
What are you trying to deny ? Say something that makes sense that isn’t babble.You smart as heck demofks can’t talk correctly. Reread your first sentence dummass
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are you trying to deny ? Say something that makes sense that isn’t babble.You smart as heck demofks can’t talk correctly. Reread your first sentence dummass
I've just noticed, he goes by emotionsThat guy doesn’t do facts
You noticed something ? That’s an improvement.I've just noticed, he goes by emotions
The 2nd thing I noticed is, you're full of shit as well.You noticed something ? That’s an improvement.
What do you think “climate change” is ? I’ve yet to get an answer from a denier that makes sense.The 2nd thing I noticed is, you're full of shit as well.
As the debate has been going on for years, little graphs posted, the replication crisis in full effect, scientists getting defunded and cancelled if they don't follow the climate narrative, all you get is, "All scientists confirm man made climate.....". Then in the news, "We're reaching tipping point". Then they're claiming it's getting too late to save the planet.
Then idiots like yourself come along and claim, "Which scientists claim the earth is doomed, which bla bla bla is bla bla".
All I can say is to retards like yourself, go fuck yourself. If you've been paying attention to all this climate shite over the years, then you wouldn't be pleading ignorance.
You're someone who's well aware of the climate debacle over the years, but you just try to pick arguments for argument sake. I ain't biting, so feck off.What do you think “climate change” is ? I’ve yet to get an answer from a denier that makes sense.
I‘ve NEVER heard a scientist say the “ earth is doomed”. Where do you get your ideas from ? They aren’t even the ones voiced by the AGW crowd. What is “ climate shit” ?
More babble.Wtf do you think it is ? I know what every country in the world, every university and major corp is saying ? Do you ? It says nothing about Dino’s ..Just asking. I don’t know what you deniers are against ? What are you saying about dinasours and what do they have to do with AGW now ? The idea behind AGW is simple with abundant evidence. So explain what you’re against.You're someone who's well aware of the climate debacle over the years, but you just try to pick arguments for argument sake. I ain't biting, so feck off.
I thought 2Aguy was the forum Pollock, you're giving him a run for his money.
Next you will claim, "What dinosaurs"
His claim is quite accurate. See Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia
You science illiterates can even ask a sensible question ?
I bet you don’t even know what “you are denying”. Hilarious.
Well, you still can’t tell us can you ?![]()
There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations
The video above is from Friends of Science, a Canada-based “non-profit organization run by dedicated volunteers comprised mainly of active and retired earth and atmospheric scientists, engineers, and other professionals.” On the same day last week that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech...www.aei.org
Wow, a contrived list with no actual names by Guus Berkhout![]()
There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations
The video above is from Friends of Science, a Canada-based “non-profit organization run by dedicated volunteers comprised mainly of active and retired earth and atmospheric scientists, engineers, and other professionals.” On the same day last week that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech...www.aei.org
AGW is not a conjecture. It is a very widely accepted theory. You have refuted absolutely nothing I have ever said about the consensus among climate scientists supporting AGW and the conclusions of the IPCC.Still sticking with the dumb consensus crap no wonder you are deep in error over the stupid AGW conjecture that is impossible to exist, oh there is no dispute that CO2 can absorb IR but most of it actually goes right by that small CO2 absorption range while Positive Feedback Loop doesn't exist outside modeling fantasies.
I have showed you many consensus failures thus you have been refuted on this for a long time already.
![]()
Wow. Conjecture ? It’s a theory science illiterate. . You also don’t believe in consensus. Where does that leave you. First, you don’t believe in evidence because that’s the only way an accepted topic becomes a theory. Secondly you don’t believe in consensus so you only believe in shit the the vast majority of EXPERTS do NOT agree with.Still sticking with the dumb consensus crap no wonder you are deep in error over the stupid AGW conjecture
You’re right, it’s bullshitAGW is not a conjecture
A common opinion among science illiteratesYou’re right, it’s bullshit
/——-/ Fact is, Mable, I never listened to Tucker until you libtards started screeching about him. Now I watch his videos daily. Thank you.Obviously not. You need to go to any university web site in the world or any climate research facility which is hard to do with tucker screaming in your ear.
Thanks for admitting. This is the web. You can make up any kind of shit you want. Anyone who like flat earth idiots who doubts the validity of science can BS all the time. You don’t know shit and neither does your main squeeze Tucker compared to climate science institutes./——-/ Fact is, Mable, I never listened to Tucker until you libtards started screeching about him. Now I watch his videos daily. Thank you.
Well explain the science?A common opinion among science illiterates
Can you explain why almost every scientist on the planet accepts it? Or why we should take YOUR opinon over THEIRS?You’re right, it [AGW] is bullshit
No one can, cause you lie about it! No such thing as majority here.Can you explain why almost every scientist on the planet accepts it? Or why we should take YOUR opinon over THEIRS?
/——/ So teach us science illiterates what is the ideal climate. What is your climate goal? Is it the same worldwide or does science have targets for each hemisphere? And once you achieve climatic nirvana, how do you stop the climatic adjustments? In other words, how do you prevent going too far in the opposite direction? Do we start burning fossil fuels and shut down some windmills? How do science literates explain it?A common opinion among science illiterates