You must be smart. How would you modify the catchment basins so that a once-in-a-century precipitation can all be caught?Smart folks would make sure to catch the run off to avoid water shortages! But those types don’t exist there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You must be smart. How would you modify the catchment basins so that a once-in-a-century precipitation can all be caught?Smart folks would make sure to catch the run off to avoid water shortages! But those types don’t exist there
You must be smart. How would you modify the catchment basins so that a once-in-a-century precipitation can all be caught?
And how would you modify the catchment basins to capture all that water?The FRAUD loves the "once in a hundred year" events.
Problem - if you have 500 locations, you average 5 such events each year - YAWN....
Weather is not climate, but the Co2 FRAUD always tries to use it....
So it doesn’t rain in the hills in the summers? And snow in the Sierra mountains never happened until this storm? Really?You must be smart. How would you modify the catchment basins so that a once-in-a-century precipitation can all be caught?
Yep...first time in Saudi Arabia in 100 years!!
Look at the look on their faces...like "WTF??!"
I laughed....my balls off...
Obviously not. You need to go to any university web site in the world or any climate research facility which is hard to do with tucker screaming in your ear.Yeah, the political side of this controversy has no rules --it's all CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
Now, there very well may be a scientific side to this mess but so far I haven't seen it.
You’ve seen climate change happen? Where?Obviously not. You need to go to any university web site in the world or any climate research facility which is hard to do with tucker screaming in your ear.
I wouldn't be wasting 40% of it on the delta smelt... but then thats someone using their brain.How much will be lost when it melts? The 'system" isn't built to fill from catastrophic precipitation.
Obviously not. You need to go to any university web site in the world or any climate research facility which is hard to do with tucker screaming in your ear.
40% of what?I wouldn't be wasting 40% of it on the delta smelt... but then thats someone using their brain.
Cali has been dumping 40% of its water to maintain the delta smelt. They took that from farmers years ago... Its way past time to return that to the farmers as the delta smelt can survive in fish tanks... IT really has no useful place in the eco system.40% of what?
Where is Al Gore when you need him ... ! ?
If Gore had not invested in green technologies you'd be accusing him of hypocrisy. And you can be certain he could have invested in stocks with better returns. Besides, what is it you believe he has done that he should not have done? He was a private individual when he made "An Inconvenient Truth", science has borne out the validity of his themes and he has broken no financial laws with the investments he has made. It wasn't insider trading or reevaluating assets to dodge taxes and secure unjustified loans.Wallowing in the money pile he conned from warmist/alarmists suckers who will believe anything he says to look ................ oh well,![]()
No, he made the bulk of his wealth on climate fearmongering activities.If Gore had not invested in green technologies you'd be accusing him of hypocrisy. And you can be certain he could have invested in stocks with better returns. Besides, what is it you believe he has done that he should not have done? He was a private individual when he made "An Inconvenient Truth", science has borne out the validity of his themes and he has broken no financial laws with the investments he has made. It wasn't insider trading or reevaluating assets to dodge taxes and secure unjustified loans.
No, he made the bulk of his wealth on climate fearmongering activities.
He has fooled you too apparently.
WW2
I am not the one that's been fooled here. How is it that AGW deniers such as you believe that tens of thousands of scientists and people like Gore could put their entire professional lives at risk, cast aside all moral compunction and organize themselves into a massive and apparently impenetrably secure conspiracy (likely requiring FAR more work than just doing the research they 'claim' to be doing) in order to earn the same incomes they could earn WITHOUT taking any such risks AND YET, the coal and oil industry, whose very multi-billion dollar existence is clearly threatened by AGW theory and the mitigation measures required to save us from it never raises the slightest inkling of doubt among you all. Our fossil fuels, it appears, are produced by altruistic angels with absolutely no concern for their futures or that of their industry while our scientific research is being done by horrific demons intent on destroying the world solely for their twisted pleasures.No, he made the bulk of his wealth on climate fearmongering activities.
He has fooled you too apparently.
![]()
Really ? That’s BS. You can get a real live medical researcher technician on line for you medical questions, you can get a climate research technician at their facilities. Obviously you’re more interested in spreading lies and making up shit then actually doing anything . That’s why deniers are frauds.A climate research facility is just a computer model