Global Warming is happening...on Mars

[CrusaderFrank]

Getting deep into the bullshit and lies again, there, old boy. Links? No? Of course not, because this is just another lie.

Was Phil Jones lying when he said there's been no Global Warming?

No, Frank, you are lying because Jones did not say that.

"BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming

Phil Jones: Yes..."

BBC News - Q&A: Professor Phil Jones

Can't be any clearer than that

 

[konradv]

Was Phil Jones lying when he said there's been no Global Warming?

No, Frank, you are lying because Jones did not say that.

"BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warmingPhil Jones: Yes..."

BBC News - Q&A: Professor Phil Jones

Can't be any clearer than that

Thanks for pointing out youir own lie, Frank. Anyone with even the tiniest bit of reading comprehension can see he DID NOT say there was no Global Warming. The part now in BOLD plainly shows A) the question was time limited and B) they were talking about "statistical significance". This is just another example of a denier talking out of both sides of their mouth, because if I'd posted something like that, someone would be on me in a minute saying "correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation".

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, Frank, you are lying because Jones did not say that.

"BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warmingPhil Jones: Yes..."

BBC News - Q&A: Professor Phil Jones

Can't be any clearer than that

Thanks for pointing out youir own lie, Frank. Anyone with even the tiniest bit of reading comprehension can see he DID NOT say there was no Global Warming. The part now in BOLD plainly shows A) the question was time limited and B) they were talking about "statistical significance". This is just another example of a denier talking out of both sides of their mouth, because if I'd posted something like that, someone would be on me in a minute saying "correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation".

I will post it in a way a 4th grader can understand

Prosecutor: Did you murder Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown?

OJ: Yes, but only recently and not in a statistically significant sort of way

See, they key here is, much like Phil Jones hiding the decline, the admission that theres been no warming in the Manmade Global Warming

 

[GHook93]

It's all the Greenhouse gases the Martians (Capitalist as Hugo Chavez called them) are burning!

Explain this one warmers:

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says



Or is this another one of those times we need to conveniently leave out science?

 

[konradv]

"BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warmingPhil Jones: Yes..."

BBC News - Q&A: Professor Phil Jones

Can't be any clearer than that

Thanks for pointing out youir own lie, Frank. Anyone with even the tiniest bit of reading comprehension can see he DID NOT say there was no Global Warming. The part now in BOLD plainly shows A) the question was time limited and B) they were talking about "statistical significance". This is just another example of a denier talking out of both sides of their mouth, because if I'd posted something like that, someone would be on me in a minute saying "correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation".

I will post it in a way a 4th grader can understand

Prosecutor: Did you murder Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown?

OJ: Yes, but only recently and not in a statistically significant sort of way

See, they key here is, much like Phil Jones hiding the decline, the admission that theres been no warming in the Manmade Global Warming

I was right!!! Your stupidity know no bounds!!! I presume in your analogy Murder = GW?

If so, then "OJ's" answer was "YES". It's in black-and-white in your own post! Now also in BOLD, since you're not too quick on the uptake.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Thanks for pointing out youir own lie, Frank. Anyone with even the tiniest bit of reading comprehension can see he DID NOT say there was no Global Warming. The part now in BOLD plainly shows A) the question was time limited and B) they were talking about "statistical significance". This is just another example of a denier talking out of both sides of their mouth, because if I'd posted something like that, someone would be on me in a minute saying "correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation".

I will post it in a way a 4th grader can understand

Prosecutor: Did you murder Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown?

OJ: Yes, but only recently and not in a statistically significant sort of way

See, they key here is, much like Phil Jones hiding the decline, the admission that theres been no warming in the Manmade Global Warming

I was right!!! Your stupidity know no bounds!!! I presume in your analogy Murder = GW?

If so, then "OJ's" answer was "YES". It's in black-and-white in your own post! Now also in BOLD, since you're not too quick on the uptake.

Right, OJ's answer is Yes and so was Phil Jones.

Glad you finally caught on

 

[konradv]

I will post it in a way a 4th grader can understand

Prosecutor: Did you murder Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown?

OJ: Yes, but only recently and not in a statistically significant sort of way

See, they key here is, much like Phil Jones hiding the decline, the admission that theres been no warming in the Manmade Global Warming

I was right!!! Your stupidity know no bounds!!! I presume in your analogy Murder = GW?

If so, then "OJ's" answer was "YES". It's in black-and-white in your own post! Now also in BOLD, since you're not too quick on the uptake.

Right, OJ's answer is Yes and so was Phil Jones.

Glad you finally caught on

I know, he said "Yes, there is Global Warming". Don't what you're laughing at excepting that you're suddenly realizing what a fool you are.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I was right!!! Your stupidity know no bounds!!! I presume in your analogy Murder = GW?

If so, then "OJ's" answer was "YES". It's in black-and-white in your own post! Now also in BOLD, since you're not too quick on the uptake.

Right, OJ's answer is Yes and so was Phil Jones.

Glad you finally caught on

I know, he said "Yes, there is Global Warming". Don't what you're laughing at excepting that you're suddenly realizing what a fool you are.

Is English not your first language? How many lobotomies have been performed on you, I mean so far this week?

BBC: There's been no Global Warming

Jones: Yes

Are there any adults nearby that can read this to you?

 

[RWatt]

Lets do a little thought experiment and pretend for a few minutes that CO2 could absorb and retain IR energy. OK. Lets section out a million parts of air. In that million parts, lets say that there are 400 parts (for the sake of argument) of CO2.

How hot do you suppose those 400 parts would have to get in order to effectively raise the temperature of the surrounding 999,600 parts? Do keep in mind that convection and conduction are constantly working towards carrying all the energy into space.

They only have to be slightly warmer than their surroundings for their surroundings to warm up over time.

Think of GHG molecules as tiny engines that convert some of the passing IR into heat. GHG molecules will absorb passing IR and some of that absorbed energy will go into increased vibrations and collisions with neighboring molecules passing heat along. If you have enough of these tiny machines throughout the atmosphere you get a general warming effect.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I was right!!! Your stupidity know no bounds!!! I presume in your analogy Murder = GW?

If so, then "OJ's" answer was "YES". It's in black-and-white in your own post! Now also in BOLD, since you're not too quick on the uptake.

Right, OJ's answer is Yes and so was Phil Jones.

Glad you finally caught on

I know, he said "Yes, there is Global Warming". Don't what you're laughing at excepting that you're suddenly realizing what a fool you are.

Are you a moron?

Phil Jones agrees that there's been no warming

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Lets do a little thought experiment and pretend for a few minutes that CO2 could absorb and retain IR energy. OK. Lets section out a million parts of air. In that million parts, lets say that there are 400 parts (for the sake of argument) of CO2.

How hot do you suppose those 400 parts would have to get in order to effectively raise the temperature of the surrounding 999,600 parts? Do keep in mind that convection and conduction are constantly working towards carrying all the energy into space.

They only have to be slightly warmer than their surroundings for their surroundings to warm up over time.

Think of GHG molecules as tiny engines that convert some of the passing IR into heat. GHG molecules will absorb passing IR and some of that absorbed energy will go into increased vibrations and collisions with neighboring molecules passing heat along. If you have enough of these tiny machines throughout the atmosphere you get a general warming effect.

Sounds interesting.

Can you show us one single repeatable laboratory experiment where a 60PPM increase gives those tiny CO2 warming engines the opportunity to raise temperatures as you allege?

 

[daveman]

the science of dismanteling science has a glowing hot spot in climatology.....

Indeed. The AGW cultists certainly are making a mockery of science, aren't they?

 

[Old Rocks]

Indeed, Daveboy, you are making a mockery of the idea that Conservatives have any brains at all.

The 'cultists' include virtually every Scientific Society on this planet, every National Academy of Science, and every major University. NASA, NOAA, USGS, and every like agency of other nations have vast amounts of data demonstrating the warming of our planet.

It is people like yourself that are cultists, refusing to look at or try to understand the data the scientists are presenting.

 

[daveman]

Indeed, Daveboy, you are making a mockery of the idea that Conservatives have any brains at all.

The 'cultists' include virtually every Scientific Society on this planet, every National Academy of Science, and every major University. NASA, NOAA, USGS, and every like agency of other nations have vast amounts of data demonstrating the warming of our planet.

It is people like yourself that are cultists, refusing to look at or try to understand the data the scientists are presenting.

Stamping your feet and pouting are not compelling arguments, guy.

 

[Sallow]

Explain this one warmers:

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says



Or is this another one of those times we need to conveniently leave out science?

Well it looks as if Mars is teeming with life as well..right?

If we continue the way we are..the earth will resemble mars in more ways then one.

 

[RWatt]

Lets do a little thought experiment and pretend for a few minutes that CO2 could absorb and retain IR energy. OK. Lets section out a million parts of air. In that million parts, lets say that there are 400 parts (for the sake of argument) of CO2.

How hot do you suppose those 400 parts would have to get in order to effectively raise the temperature of the surrounding 999,600 parts? Do keep in mind that convection and conduction are constantly working towards carrying all the energy into space.

They only have to be slightly warmer than their surroundings for their surroundings to warm up over time.

Think of GHG molecules as tiny engines that convert some of the passing IR into heat. GHG molecules will absorb passing IR and some of that absorbed energy will go into increased vibrations and collisions with neighboring molecules passing heat along. If you have enough of these tiny machines throughout the atmosphere you get a general warming effect.

Sounds interesting.

Can you show us one single repeatable laboratory experiment where a 60PPM increase gives those tiny CO2 warming engines the opportunity to raise temperatures as you allege?

I am not personally familiar with this area of science other than the overview to know individual lab experiments.

 

[daveman]

Explain this one warmers:

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says



Or is this another one of those times we need to conveniently leave out science?

Well it looks as if Mars is teeming with life as well..right?

If we continue the way we are..the earth will resemble mars in more ways then one.

Wait...I thought only conservatives fear-mongered.

 

[Sallow]

Explain this one warmers:




Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says



Or is this another one of those times we need to conveniently leave out science?

Well it looks as if Mars is teeming with life as well..right?

If we continue the way we are..the earth will resemble mars in more ways then one.

Wait...I thought only conservatives fear-mongered.

It's not "fear mongering". It's science.

You can't keep dumping crap alien to the environment into the soil, water and air and hope for a good outcome.

 

[daveman]

Well it looks as if Mars is teeming with life as well..right?

If we continue the way we are..the earth will resemble mars in more ways then one.

Wait...I thought only conservatives fear-mongered.

It's not "fear mongering". It's science.

You can't keep dumping crap alien to the environment into the soil, water and air and hope for a good outcome.

"ZOMG we're gonna kill every last thing on Earth if we don't adopt world socialism!!" isn't fear-mongering?

Uh huh.

 

[Sallow]

Wait...I thought only conservatives fear-mongered.

It's not "fear mongering". It's science.

You can't keep dumping crap alien to the environment into the soil, water and air and hope for a good outcome.

"ZOMG we're gonna kill every last thing on Earth if we don't adopt world socialism!!" isn't fear-mongering?

Uh huh.

Keep those logical leaps coming boys and girls.