The Institution of Slavery

Captain Creeper

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2025
Messages
3,356
Reaction score
3,802
Points
1,918
You know, since today is Choomteempth, I thought it wise to reflect on slavery in America. We all already know that it was not nearly as horrific at those on the left want us to believe. Essentially, the slavery myth pimped to people today is intended to evoke irrational emotions that actually BIND them to the political left. In other words, the slaves we set free around 1886, then in the 1900s they we put into ideological chains of the left, and whipped and lynched if they did not comply with the dogma. This is what is meant when someone uses the term "Democrat Plantation". Many blacks, without the leftist white people socializing them to believe the slave myth, would gravitate away from tribalistic urges and toward western culture and prosperity. That such is unacceptable to the left, as they pander to the poor and downtrodden, not affluent folks who can make something of themselves without the help of the left run government.

Now, when I say "slave myth", 99 out of 100 of you nadless, bedwetting leftist clowns are going to stroke out. I am not saying slavery did not exist. I am not saying that some slaves were mistreated. I AM SAYING that that it was not the holocaustic horror the left wants you to believe it was. Slaves were generally well kept. Why wouldn't they be?!? They are not worth anything to the slave owner if they cannot work. The whippings and lynchings only occurred when order needed to be maintained, kind of like what we do today when we arrest someone and put them in jail.

I will also reveal another thing to you: American slavery was not racist. Negros waded into the sub-Saharan jungles and captured other negros, then sold them into slavery. The commodity was slaves was even brokered, sometimes by the British. Did we use blacks as slaves because we hate black people? Of course not!! We used them because they were what was available on the slave market. We - America - were not rounding up the slaves. We just bought them. If the slave traders were pully Arabs out of the desert, or brown Asian people out of south Asia, we would have bought them, but only if they were cheaper than the black slaves on the market. The market dictated who was bought and sold. There is nothing "racist" about that. But the left likes to spin yarns and make people believe it was all about race. Nonsense!! The fact that our slaves had black skin of of no relevance. The left imputed relevance to skin color, not us. The left has brainwashed generations of young, mush heads about slavery. That it was bad, brutal, the result of white supremacy, and so on and so forth. Most of it are lies; defamatory lies.

I just wanted to clear this up, as a lot of you yo-yos on the left are still harboring non-truths about slavery. I would be fine having slavery today, but in a modified form of indentured servitude. I think that for unskilled immigrants, once they are properly vetted, each one should have to complete a 10 year period of indentured servitude in industry or agriculture in order to eventually become a citizen. What is wrong with that?!? It would be consensual. Slavery/servitude has been a traditional form of labor since the beginning of humanity. Why not adapt it to our present day morality rather than do away with it for good? The institution of servitude is NOT what the left wants you to believe it is. When you free your mind of the left's lies, you open your mind to the possibilities.
 
You know, since today is Choomteempth, I thought it wise to reflect on slavery in America. We all already know that it was not nearly as horrific at those on the left want us to believe.
.

Look at how many people have to work 2+ jobs to feed their families and then lose half of what they earn to the tax machine. So, who's the slave?

Slaves had to work hard, but their food, housing and medical care were provided, and they paid no taxes.

.
 
Back
Top Bottom