Global Warming Deniers, discuss your theories here!

[Brambo]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Got any proof of that?

Or are you just another brainwashed stupid ******* idiot with AlGore's penis tickling your epiglottis?

Where is your evidence that a star's "irradiance" never ever wavers?

You are a brainwashed fool.

Look up Total Solar Irradiance you dumb shit...what the **** is wrong with you people? No one takes you holocaust deniers seriously.

 

[Muhammed]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

 

[westwall]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Got any proof of that?

Or are you just another brainwashed stupid ******* idiot with AlGore's penis tickling your epiglottis?

Where is your evidence that a star's "irradiance" never ever wavers?

You are a brainwashed fool.

Look up Total Solar Irradiance you dumb shit...what the **** is wrong with you people? No one takes you holocaust deniers seriously.

We do silly boy. Soooooo, calculate the warming effect that you so kindly provided OVER THE ENTIRE PLANET.

I'll wait...

 

[Brambo]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

 

[westwall]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

 

[Brambo]

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

 

[Muhammed]

If the sun did not exist, what would the surface air temperature of the Earth be?

Chicken little dumbasses are too ******* stupid to even fathom that.

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You are a brainwashed dumbass.

If you cannot admit that the sun has a MASSIVE influence on the temperature of Earth, you are simply a stupid ************, an imbecile, a lunatic, a Democrat, an idiot, a retard, a drug addict, and/or something of that sort.

 

[westwall]

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

Not even close silly person. I do have a question though... are you frothing at the mouth as you fling your poo? Just wondering.... Here is a simple question. Does the Sun control global temp or does CO2?

GO!

 

[Brambo]

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

Not even close silly person. I do have a question though... are you frothing at the mouth as you fling your poo? Just wondering.... Here is a simple question. Does the Sun control global temp or does CO2?

GO!

Your question is stupid. The Sun contributes an EXTRAORDINARILY STEADY 1,365 watts per square meter to the Earth's energy budget.

CO2 adds 4 watts per square meter for every 250 ppm.

Why do you hate science you buttfucking Holocaust denier?

 

[Brambo]

Stupid statement, the Sun's irradiance hasn't changed any.

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You are a brainwashed dumbass.

If you cannot admit that the sun has a MASSIVE influence on the temperature of Earth, you are simply a stupid ************, an imbecile, a lunatic, a Democrat, an idiot, a retard, a drug addict, and/or something of that sort.

Massive influence? No

Its influence is a virtual constant in the climate system.

That's why you're a ******* retard.

 

[westwall]

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

Not even close silly person. I do have a question though... are you frothing at the mouth as you fling your poo? Just wondering.... Here is a simple question. Does the Sun control global temp or does CO2?

GO!

Your question is stupid. The Sun contributes an EXTRAORDINARILY STEADY 1,365 watts per square meter to the Earth's energy budget.

CO2 adds 4 watts per square meter for every 250 ppm.

Why do you hate science you buttfucking Holocaust denier?

What mechanism does CO2 use to add that "massive" 4 watts? How exactly does it do its magic?

 

[Brambo]

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

Not even close silly person. I do have a question though... are you frothing at the mouth as you fling your poo? Just wondering.... Here is a simple question. Does the Sun control global temp or does CO2?

GO!

Your question is stupid. The Sun contributes an EXTRAORDINARILY STEADY 1,365 watts per square meter to the Earth's energy budget.

CO2 adds 4 watts per square meter for every 250 ppm.

Why do you hate science you buttfucking Holocaust denier?

What mechanism does CO2 use to add that "massive" 4 watts? How exactly does it do its magic?

It absorbs long wave radiation rather than allowing it to radiate back into space. Do you deny this reality?

 

[hjmick]

Why are you people bothering with this blowhard?

 

[Brambo]

Why are you people bothering with this blowhard?

Why do you deny basic science?

 

[hjmick]

Why are you people bothering with this blowhard?

Why do you deny basic science?

You have no clue, none, on where I come down on the issue. Furthermore, you will never have any idea where I stand on the issue. Discussion or debate with you is meaningless, pointless, and beneath me. You are a liar. You are worthy of nothing but insults, ridicule, and disdain.


You are dismissed.

 

[jc456]

Sure thing junior. Sure thing..

Total Solar Irradiance fluctuates between a 0.5 watt per square meter amount between roughly 1,364 and 1,365 watts per square meter.

In other words, you were ******* wrong, dumbass.

0.5 watts per square meter out of 1,365 watts per square meter is VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE AT ALL.

It's a small fraction, that represents 1/16th the change that is caused by CO2 alone. (0.25 watts from the mean).

You're a stupid shit-filled fly covered vagina.

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

does the sun ever stop hitting the earth surface?

 

[westwall]

You appear to be as good at math as mann is... which is to say pretty ******* pathetic!

Better than you. .25 is 1/16th of 4.

.25 is the deviation from the mean of a 0.5 fluctuation.

0.5 watts (min to max) is a very small change compared to 1,365 watts.

You are a shit soaked PMS rag.

Not even close silly person. I do have a question though... are you frothing at the mouth as you fling your poo? Just wondering.... Here is a simple question. Does the Sun control global temp or does CO2?

GO!

Your question is stupid. The Sun contributes an EXTRAORDINARILY STEADY 1,365 watts per square meter to the Earth's energy budget.

CO2 adds 4 watts per square meter for every 250 ppm.

Why do you hate science you buttfucking Holocaust denier?

What mechanism does CO2 use to add that "massive" 4 watts? How exactly does it do its magic?

It absorbs long wave radiation rather than allowing it to radiate back into space. Do you deny this reality?

But what then happens to that long wave IR?

 

[flacaltenn]

Discuss your theories why the Earth is warming here.

Hint:

Volcanoes, Solar output, and Earth Orbit have already been DISPROVEN.

Liar.

CO2 isotopic abundance ratios prove that the rise in CO2 is not due to Volcanoes.

Satellite measurements of the Solar Irradiance proves the Sun is not heating-up, and the atmosphere is not uniformly heating it's heating in the Troposphere where CO2 affects the most.

And the orbital pattern is almost virtually...OBVIOUS, we can definitely measure that.

You've been punked on Total Solar Irradiance (TSI). Again. Damn you're behind on this stuff.

TSI rose by about 1.4 W/m2 from the 1700 solar minimum to about 1965. It REMAINED at a relative maximum until very recently showing signs of decline. That amount is about 1/2 of what it takes to explain most of the warming.

The propaganda does everything it can to talk about sun spots and NOT true TSI measurements and proxies. They are NOT the same thing. Since the baseline AVERAGE is removed from any solar output "estimated" with mere sunspots.

Now since the Earth is a MASSIVE thermal mass and there are lots of storage mechanisms in ocean heating -- NOTHING reaches equilibrium in a year or even 50. THat's a fact. So leaving your heater on without a thermostat to trip it -- will continue to heat the house even if the air from the heater stays the same temperature and energy.

Only idiots plot "correlation curves" showing how well CO2 (or any other single GH variable) track over 50 or 100 years. THat's juvenile and silly.. Because for thermo system that big and that complex -- there is NO REQUIREMENT that the output has to look like the input that "created it". Did ya get all that or do ya need some background. I can't go simpler than all that.

 

[flacaltenn]

Liar.

CO2 isotopic abundance ratios prove that the rise in CO2 is not due to Volcanoes.

Satellite measurements of the Solar Irradiance proves the Sun is not heating-up, and the atmosphere is not uniformly heating it's heating in the Troposphere where CO2 affects the most.

And the orbital pattern is almost virtually...OBVIOUS, we can definitely measure that.

Matt, can you post one (1) lab experiment showing the effect a 120PPM change in CO2 has on temperature?

Arrhenius already did this 150 years ago you dumb ****.

explain his experiment? What did he do?

Look it up yourself bozo.

Look up the US thermal guidance weapons testing of the 50s-70s.

The information is GOOGLE

Won't help. These are the deniers you are looking to wrestle with. The rest of us have actually studied some science. There are sources on the Web that FEED this belligerence. And not even a 10th grade environmental science book would convince them..

 

[Gracie]

Discuss your theories why the Earth is warming here.

Hint:

Volcanoes, Solar output, and Earth Orbit have already been DISPROVEN.

It's really simple. Take a 1 acre plot and put 2 people on it. It will not affect the flora and fauna. Add 4 more people who then build houses for the 6 living there. Add 6 chimneys. Still not much affect. Add 12 more people, add animals in pens where the shit collects in bins. Add more chimneys. Install some wind turbines for energy. Dam up the creek that flows thru it. Now add 24 more people. It's starting to get a tad crowded, ain't it? Damn breaks, floods the field. Bird die from the wind power. Ground is now soiled from burying or burning the manure. The people now there each just added to their family with 2 kids per couple. Now its really crowded. Something is gonna break and my bet is it will be that acre.