Stryder50
Platinum Member
Well you just demonstrated what a dufus, fool,and ignoramus you are by failing to open the other link;Well maybe there is one guy out there with a flat earth theory too. He's Galileo!!! Lol

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well you just demonstrated what a dufus, fool,and ignoramus you are by failing to open the other link;Well maybe there is one guy out there with a flat earth theory too. He's Galileo!!! Lol
Over 200 respected scientific agenciesA small percentage of the total global scientific community, and look like ones chasing government funding only available for pro ACC/AGW stances.
But if you believe them and that CO2 is the danger, than you will personally stop emitting CO2 immediately, right?
Dude. That is laughableWell you just demonstrated what a dufus, fool,and ignoramus you are by failing to open the other link;
![]()
Home - CO2 Coalition
co2coalition.org
You and your fellow believers are the flat earthers since you deny natural climate change, and ignore that water vapor is about 100 times the GHG that CO2 is.Well maybe there is one guy out there with a flat earth theory too. He's Galileo!!! Lol
Your choice to ignore it.Big whoop. They spew opinion. Opinion based on computer models
NOT data.
Like me and nasa? LolYou and your fellow believers are the flat earthers since you deny natural climate change, and ignore that water vapor is about 100 times the GHG that CO2 is.
You failed to invalidate the data in the graphs I presented in posts #113 and #118.Like me and nasa? Lol
Your choice to go with opinion rather than data ~ evidence.Your choice to ignore it.
Well you just demonstrated what a dufus, fool,and ignoramus you are by failing to open the other link;
![]()
Home - CO2 Coalition
co2coalition.org
You failed to dispute any of the data I presented hereYou failed to invalidate the data in the graphs I presented in posts #113 and #118.
Opinions, even if from NASA hacks paid to say it's ACC/AGW, aren't science or data. Just politics as usual.
BTW, you failed to point out the science within that NASA link.
Your still exhaling CO2 so obviously you don't believe CO2 is pollution, or do you lack guts and integrity to do the honorable thing?
If everyone whom believes in ACC and AGW were to stop exhaling CO2there would be no ACC and AGW.![]()
You failed to dispute any of the data I presented hereYou failed to invalidate the data in the graphs I presented in posts #113 and #118.
Opinions, even if from NASA hacks paid to say it's ACC/AGW, aren't science or data. Just politics as usual.
BTW, you failed to point out the science within that NASA link.
Your still exhaling CO2 so obviously you don't believe CO2 is pollution, or do you lack guts and integrity to do the honorable thing?
If everyone whom believes in ACC and AGW were to stop exhaling CO2there would be no ACC and AGW.![]()
Only post to the echo chamber. LolThat's why I put the troll on ignore.
Don't feed the trolls!
Your choice to ignore it.
You don't have any dataBecause I am a scientist I DO ignore computer generated fiction.
It isn't "data".
Something you anti science types don't seem to understand.
Your Wiki link is written by the pro ACC/AGW conspiracy group that is seeking to defraud the public, scam taxpayer funding, and advance an anti-West, Marxist agenda.Dude. That is laughable
The CO2 Coalition is a nonprofit advocacy organization in the United States founded in 2015.[1] Its claims conflict with the scientific consensus on climate change and it spreads misinformation about climate change.[2]
Your Wiki link is written by the pro ACC/AGW conspiracy group that is seeking to defraud the public, scam taxpayer funding, and advance an anti-West, Marxist agenda.
Would be laughable if not for efforts to enact laws and legislation that are harmful to the economy, society, and human safety.
This makes them a dangerous threat, should be removed from effectiveness.
I know. Almost everyone is part of a worldwide conspiracy against youYour Wiki link is written by the pro ACC/AGW conspiracy group that is seeking to defraud the public, scam taxpayer funding, and advance an anti-West, Marxist agenda.
Would be laughable if not for efforts to enact laws and legislation that are harmful to the economy, society, and human safety.
This makes them a dangerous threat, should be removed from effectiveness.
You didn't present data, you presented an opinion piece funded by an agency in pursuit of purpose to increase it's existence and guv'mint funding.You failed to dispute any of the data I presented here
You failed to dispute any of the data I presented here
![]()
Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?
The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.climate.nasa.gov
I know. Almost everyone is part of a worldwide conspiracy against tooYour Wiki link is written by the pro ACC/AGW conspiracy group that is seeking to defraud the public, scam taxpayer funding, and advance an anti-West, Marxist agenda.
Would be laughable if not for efforts to enact laws and legislation that are harmful to the economy, society, and human safety.
This makes them a dangerous threat, should be removed from effectiveness.
Actually that site has dozens of peer reviewed research studies in the referencesYou didn't present data, you presented an opinion piece funded by an agency in pursuit of purpose to increase it's existence and guv'mint funding.
Check the mirror.I know. Almost everyone is part of a worldwide conspiracy against you
We meet every Tuesday to go over our dastardly plans
You may claim anything you like. I think there are a few scientific skeptics that don't agree with AGWCheck the mirror.
If you claim there is a conspiracy against the fraud of ACC/AGW, funded by the "fossil fuel industry", than the counter point is equally valid.