Get ready for another slam from the courts

[miketx]

One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was a monumental moment in the history of the high court. But another major decision may still be coming.

www.foxnews.com

Lol, democrats will start eating each other now.


Believe it or not, overturning Roe v. Wade may not be the Supreme Court’s most dramatic decision this year. Instead, its ruling on West Virginia v. the Environmental Protection Agency could prove far more consequential. It could literally upend how our government works.

For the better.

West Virginia vs. the EPA asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by Congress. This SCOTUS could well decide that ruling by executive agency fiat is no longer acceptable.


Go court!

 

[Votto]

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Barry Obammy started politicizing the government agencies.
The Agencies are not supposed to be making laws.

 

[1srelluc]

Truth.

A favorable decision will set the dem greenies back on their heels for generations.

The long-term impact it could have will make the all other decisions of this term look like mere foreplay and I suspect that's the reason the dems are playing it down.....They be skeered.

 

[Votto]

By deciding in favor of West Virginia, the court could begin to rein in the vast powers of the alphabet agencies in D.C. that run our lives and return it to legislators whom we elect to create…legislation. Just as the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade that abortion laws are more appropriately left up to the people’s elected representatives, it may decide in West Virginia vs. EPA that Congress, and not federal agencies, should write our laws.

A decision that puts Congress in charge would stall environmental rules intended to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy. Legislators, back in the driver’s seat, would have to debate and go public with the consequences – and costs -- of regulations that are now adopted with little buy-in from the public.

 

[Votto]

If SCOTUS fails to give law making back to elected officials, it will be the end of democracy!!

 

[miketx]

Our "representatives" will now have to take a stance on things and not manipulate bereaucrats behind the scene so we can see what these tyrants are doing.

 

[1srelluc]

I bet the congress-critters (both flavors) are nervous as hell. They might (oh my) have to do some real legislating.

 

[TNHarley]

This would be fucking fantastic!
You might have just made my day, mike.

 

[Votto]

 

[miketx]

 

[rightwinger]

So the Supreme Court will rule that the Environmental Protection Agency can’t protect the Environment

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The Globalists, the Democrat party and mainstream media (oops, sorry for being so completely redundant there) have already started working to try to delegitimize the Supreme court.

I imagine once the propaganda takes hold in a few months, all the sheeple here will all be for abolishing it.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Distant Thunder On the Supreme Court

We are coming off one of the greatest weeks in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. And yet, a largely unreported dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas may be the harbinger of something important that is still to come. The case is Coral Ridge Ministries v. Southern Poverty Law Center, and the...

www.powerlineblog.com

 

[miketx]

 

[Sunsettommy]

So the Supreme Court will rule that the Environmental Protection Agency can’t protect the Environment

NO they are saying that CONGRESS should have a greater role to setting up the laws that the EPA carries out, not have the EPA just make up rules by themselves as it is generally now bypassing Congress.

 

[miketx]

So the Supreme Court will rule that the Environmental Protection Agency can’t protect the Environment

Stop pretending.

 

[Votto]

NO they are saying that CONGRESS should have a greater role to setting up the laws that the EPA carries out, not have the EPA just make up rules by themselves as it is generally now bypassing Congress.

What they are saying is, if Congress deems in important enough to do things like have $10 a gallon gas to save the environment and have to spend money to the tune of around $30 trillion that increases inflation, then Congress should be accountable to the voters for it instead of unelected bureaucrats behind the curtain.

 

[miketx]

I bet the congress-critters (both flavors) are nervous as hell. They might (oh my) have to do some real legislating.

And expose who they work for.

 

[marvin martian]

One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was a monumental moment in the history of the high court. But another major decision may still be coming.

www.foxnews.com

Lol, democrats will start eating each other now.


Believe it or not, overturning Roe v. Wade may not be the Supreme Court’s most dramatic decision this year. Instead, its ruling on West Virginia v. the Environmental Protection Agency could prove far more consequential. It could literally upend how our government works.

For the better.

West Virginia vs. the EPA asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by Congress. This SCOTUS could well decide that ruling by executive agency fiat is no longer acceptable.


Go court!

Wow, I'll bet the DemoKKKrats are really regretting their assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh, all their racist baiting of Clarence Thomas, and all their misogyny towards Amy Barrett.

LOL